Seong Chan Hong and Paul Jubb will face off in the qualifications of the Citi Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 10:00 am on GRANDSTAND. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Paul Jubb who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Paul Jubb is the pick to win this match.
Paul Jubb -> 1.59
Seong Chan Hong -> 2.26
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Seong Chan Hong vs. Paul Jubb
There is no head to head record between Seong Chan Hong and Paul Jubb since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Seong Chan Hong
23 - 16win/loss
669
566
LWLLWWLLWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-27 | 21-20 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-27 | 14-12 | 10-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-26 | 4-7 | 23-19 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-15 | 9-7 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-8 | 8-3 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 181, Chan Hong got to the qualifications after beating Alex Bolt 6-4 6-4.
In the qualifications, Chan Hong had a good straight sets win against Bolt (6-4 6-4). During the match, Chan Hong scored 71 points vs Bolt’s 62. The Korean was very aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Regarding the service games, Chan Hong struck 5 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Seong Chan Hong lost the serve once and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Chan Hong put 59% of his first serves in, winning 68% (26/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 65% (17/26) on the 2nd serve. The Korean broke Bolt 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Chan Hong has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 62% of his matches (248-149). 30-16 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Chan Hong has a composed 217-109 match record in the last years on hard.
Seong’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the Nonthaburi 3 Challenger,the Bengaluru Challenger and the Busan Challenger.
The Korean has an overall 30-21 win-loss record in 2024, 30-16 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Washington
The Korean has never competed in this tournament before.
Paul Jubb
40 - 20win/loss
181
180
LLWLWWLWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 47-27 | 26-13 | 0-2 | 12-7 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-13 | 19-9 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-26 | 7-9 | 10-4 | 12-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 51-13 | 48-10 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 203, Paul got to the qualifications after beating Billy Harris 6-3 7-5.
In the qualifications, Paul had a good straight sets win against Harris (6-3 7-5). During the match Jubb scored 75 points vs Harris’s 64. Paul was extremely aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about serving, Jubb scored 8 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Paul Jubb lost the serve once and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Jubb put 61% of his first serves in, winning 76% (41/54) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (15/34) on the 2nd serve. The Brit broke Harris 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Paul’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Glasgow Challenger and M25 Nottingham.
Jubb has an aggregate 40-19 win-loss record in 2024, 22-8 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Chan Hong | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 21 |
| Pts | 71-62 | 75-64 |
| Total Points | 133 | 139 |
| Winners | 26 | 41 |
| %Winners | 37% | 55% |
Both Chan Hong and Jubb played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Chan Hong and Jubb have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Chan Hong played 1 game less than Jubb. Seong scored 26 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit recorded 41 winners (55%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Chan Hong | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 8 |
| 1st in | 38/64 | 54/88 |
| %1st in | 59% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 26/38 | 41/54 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 17/26 | 15/34 |
| %2nd pts | 65% | 44% |
Chan Hong struck 5 aces . Jubb scored 8 aces . Chan Hong won 68% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Jubb won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Chan Hong | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 3 |
| Converted | 3/8 | 3/5 |
| % Converted | 38% | 60% |
| Conceded | 9 | 10 |
| Saved | 8 | 9 |
| % Saved | 89% | 90% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
The Korean broke his opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. Chan Hong surrendered his serve once and he saved 89% of the break points that he conceded. Jubb broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve once and he saved 90% of the break points that he conceded.
| Chan Hong | |||
| Q1 Bolt |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 71-62 | 71-62 | |
| Total points | 133 | 133 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 38/64 | 38/64 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 26/38 | 26/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/26 | 17/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 3/8 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 8/9 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 89% | 89% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Jubb | |||
| Q1 Harris |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 75-64 | 75-64 | |
| Total points | 139 | 139 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 55% | 55% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 54/88 | 54/88 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 41/54 | 41/54 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/34 | 15/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
| Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 9/10 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 90% | 90% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- David GoffinGoffin – Camilo Ugo CarabelliUgo Carabelli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aslan KaratsevKaratsev – Christian GarinGarin (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Federico CoriaCoria – Jeff WolfWolf (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Harold MayotMayot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Maxime CressyCressy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elias YmerYmer – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Reilly OpelkaOpelka – James DuckworthDuckworth (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Denis ShapovalovShapovalov – Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Borna CoricCoric (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Radu AlbotAlbot (1-1) – H2H and prediction
