Terence Atmane and Jacob Fearnley will face off in the 2nd round of the Chicago Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 1:30 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jacob Fearnley who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jacob Fearnley is the pick to win this match.
Jacob Fearnley -> 1.65
Terence Atmane -> 2.15
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Terence Atmane vs. Jacob Fearnley
There is no head to head record between Terence Atmane and Jacob Fearnley since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Terence Atmane
26 - 22win/loss
120
118
LLWLWLWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 28-25 | 20-14 | 5-5 | 1-2 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 54-27 | 26-10 | 26-15 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 78-30 | 71-23 | 3-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-22 | 23-19 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 7-10 | 7-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 118 (career-high), the French player got to the 2nd round after beating Micah Braswell 7-6(4) 7-6(5).
In the 1st round, Atmane had a good straight sets win against Braswell (7-64 7-65). During the match, Atmane scored 99 points vs Braswell’s 94. Atmane was quite aggressive to blast 48 winners.
Regarding the service games, Atmane struck 5 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Terence Atmane lost the serve twice and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Atmane put 66% of his first serves in, winning 73% (48/66) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (15/34) on the 2nd serve. Terence broke Braswell twice after converting 20% of his break points (2/10).
Atmane has a solid record in the last 7 years having won 63% of his matches (191-112). 18-10 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Atmane has an aggregate147-73 record in the last 7 years on hard.
The French player best result of the year was getting to the final in the Granby Challenger.
Atmane has an overall 26-21 win-loss record in 2024, 18-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Chicago Challenger
Terence has never competed in this tournament before.
Jacob Fearnley
21 - 3win/loss
158
158
LWWWWWLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 27-5 | 10-2 | 0-0 | 8-0 | 9-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 17-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 16-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 225 (career-high), Jacob reached the 2nd round after defeating Cooper Williams 6-1 7-6(8), Antoine Bellier 4-6 6-3 6-0 and Li Tu 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round, Fearnley had a good straight sets win against Tu (6-4 6-3). During the match Fearnley scored 57 points vs Tu’s 46. The Brit was exceptionally aggressive to blast 24 winners.
About the serving games, Fearnley bagged 2 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Jacob Fearnley was very effective on serve to win 75% (24/32) of his 1st serve and 53% (8/15) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Brit broke Tu 4 times after converting 67% of his break points (4/6).
His best result of the season was conquering the title the Nottingham 2 Challenger where he overcame Charles Broom in the final 4-6 6-4 6-3.
Jacob has a compiled 20-3 win-loss record in 2024, 3-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Atmane | Fearnley |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 26 | 64 |
| Pts | 99-94 | 218-175 |
| Total Points | 193 | 393 |
| Winners | 48 | 101 |
| %Winners | 48% | 46% |
Atmane played 1 match while Fearnley competed in 3 matches. Fearnley started his run from the qualifications while Atmane had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Jacob Fearnley lost 1 set while Terence Atmane hasn’t lost a set so far. Atmane has played 5 set(s) less than Fearnley (2 vs 7). Therefore, Atmane played 38 games less than Fearnley. The French player scored 48 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, Jacob struck 101 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Atmane | Fearnley |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 14 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 4.7 |
| 1st in | 66/100 | 124/191 |
| %1st in | 66% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 48/66 | 101/124 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 15/34 | 30/67 |
| %2nd pts | 44% | 45% |
Atmane managed to score 5 aces . Fearnley made 14 aces (4.7 per match). Atmane won 73% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 44% of the points. On the other side, Fearnley won 81% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Atmane | Fearnley |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 12 |
| Converted | 2/10 | 12/22 |
| % Converted | 20% | 55% |
| Conceded | 10 | 12 |
| Saved | 8 | 8 |
| % Saved | 80% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 4 |
Terence broke his opponent twice with a 20% conversion rate. The French player surrendered his serve twice and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. Fearnley broke his opponents 12 times with a 55% conversion rate. Jacob conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Atmane | |||
| R1 Braswell |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-64 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 26 | |
| pts | 99-94 | 99-94 | |
| Total points | 193 | 193 | |
| Winners | 48 | 48 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 66/100 | 66/100 | |
| % 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 48/66 | 48/66 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/34 | 15/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/10 | 2/10 | |
| Converted % | 20% | 20% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 8/10 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Fearnley | |||||
| Q1 Williams |
Q3 Bellier |
R1 Tu |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 7-68 | 4-6 6-3 6-0 | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 25 | 19 | 64 | |
| pts | 79-64 | 82-65 | 57-46 | 218-175 | |
| Total points | 143 | 147 | 103 | 393 | |
| Winners | 37 | 40 | 24 | 101 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 49% | 42% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 7 | 5 | 2 | 14 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 5 | 3 | 16 | |
| 1st in | 41/71 | 51/73 | 32/47 | 124/191 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 70% | 68% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 37/41 | 40/51 | 24/32 | 101/124 | |
| % 1st pts | 90% | 78% | 75% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/30 | 10/22 | 8/15 | 30/67 | |
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 45% | 53% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 5 | 4 | 12 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 5/9 | 4/6 | 12/22 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 56% | 67% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 5 | 1 | 12 | |
| Saved | 5/6 | 3/5 | 0/1 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 60% | 0% | 143% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWLWLWW
LWWWWWLWWW Tennis Scores in Chicago Challenger
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Charles BroomBroom (6-3 6-74 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Joao FonsecaFonseca (7-61 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Learner TienTien – Aidan MayoMayo (6-3 6-74 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Philip SekulicSekulic (6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – Marc PolmansPolmans (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Paul JubbJubb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Jacob FearnleyFearnley (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (2-1) – H2H and prediction
