Gabriel Diallo and Joao Fonseca will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Chicago Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 1:00 pm on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Joao Fonseca who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Joao Fonseca is the pick to win this match.
Joao Fonseca -> 1.87
Gabriel Diallo -> 1.87
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Gabriel Diallo vs. Joao Fonseca
There is no head to head record between Gabriel Diallo and Joao Fonseca since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Gabriel Diallo
21 - 16win/loss
86
86
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 49-26 | 30-12 | 7-6 | 9-4 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 39-28 | 8-11 | 2-2 | 24-10 | 5-5 | 0-0 |
2022 | 23-10 | 17-6 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 12-4 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 169, Gabriel got to the 2nd round after defeating James Kent Trotter 6-4 6-2.
In the 1st round, Diallo had a good straight sets win against Kent Trotter (6-4 6-2). During the match, Diallo scored 62 points vs Kent Trotter’s 49. Diallo was pretty aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Regarding the service games, Diallo managed to score 9 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Gabriel Diallo conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 66% of his first serves in, win 70% (26/37) of the points behind his 1st serve and 68% (13/19) on the 2nd serve. The Canadian broke Kent Trotter 3 times after converting 60% of his break points (3/5).
Diallo has a solid match record in the last 6 years having won 61% of his matches (104-66). 7-5 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Diallo has an overall47-29 record in the last 6 years on hard.
Diallo’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in the Canberra Challenger.
Diallo has a composed 20-16 win-loss record in 2024, 7-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Chicago Challenger
Diallo has never competed in this tournament before.
Joao Fonseca
17 - 16win/loss
144
144
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 32-23 | 8-3 | 14-11 | 8-5 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 11-6 | 1-1 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 217, the Brazilian got to the 2nd round after beating Yuta Shimizu 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, Joao had a good straight sets win against Shimizu (6-3 6-4). During the match Fonseca scored 68 points vs Shimizu’s 51. Joao was extremely aggressive to blast 32 winners.
About the serving games, Fonseca managed to score 3 aces and he was exceptionally steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Joao Fonseca was pretty effective on serve to win 74% (32/43) of his 1st serve and 68% (13/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Brazilian broke Shimizu twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Fonseca’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the Asuncion Challenger.
The Brazilian has a composed 17-15 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Diallo | Fonseca |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 18 | 19 |
Pts | 62-49 | 68-51 |
Total Points | 111 | 119 |
Winners | 26 | 32 |
%Winners | 42% | 47% |
Both Diallo and Fonseca played 1 match. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Diallo and Fonseca have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Diallo played 1 game less than Fonseca. The Canadian scored 26 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Joao managed to score 32 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Diallo | Fonseca |
---|---|---|
Aces | 9 | 3 |
Avg per match | 9 | 3 |
1st in | 37/56 | 43/62 |
%1st in | 66% | 69% |
1st pts | 26/37 | 32/43 |
%1st pts | 70% | 74% |
2nd pts | 13/19 | 13/19 |
%2nd pts | 68% | 68% |
Diallo scored 9 aces . Fonseca made 3 aces . Diallo won 70% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 68% of the points. On the other side, Fonseca won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 68% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Diallo | Fonseca |
---|---|---|
Won | 3 | 2 |
Converted | 3/5 | 2/5 |
% Converted | 60% | 40% |
Conceded | 0 | 0 |
Saved | 0 | 0 |
% Saved | 0% | 0% |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
The Canadian broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Diallo quite strong on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 0 break points. The Brazilian broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. Joao was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points.
Diallo | |||
R1 Kent |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
pts | 62-49 | 62-49 | |
Total points | 111 | 111 | |
Winners | 26 | 26 | |
%Winners | 42% | 42% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 9 | 9 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 37/56 | 37/56 | |
% 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
1st pts | 26/37 | 26/37 | |
% 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
2nd pts | 13/19 | 13/19 | |
% 2nd pts | 68% | 68% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/5 | 3/5 | |
Converted % | 60% | 60% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Fonseca | |||
R1 Shimizu |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 68-51 | 68-51 | |
Total points | 119 | 119 | |
Winners | 32 | 32 | |
%Winners | 47% | 47% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
1st in | 43/62 | 43/62 | |
% 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
1st pts | 32/43 | 32/43 | |
% 1st pts | 74% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 13/19 | 13/19 | |
% 2nd pts | 68% | 68% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 2 | 2 | |
Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Chicago Challenger
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (2-6 7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Andrew FentyFenty (6-1 7-64) – See score progression
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Michael ZhengZheng (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-4 2-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Hugo GrenierGrenier – Bernard TomicTomic (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Nishesh BasavareddyBasavareddy – Mark LajalLajal (2-6 7-66 7-5) – See score progression
- Aidan MayoMayo – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (6-4 3-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Li TuTu (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Joao FonsecaFonseca – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Philip SekulicSekulic – Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Alex BoltBolt (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Learner TienTien – Benjamin BonziBonzi (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Charles BroomBroom – Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro (6-74 6-2 7-65) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Arthur GeaGea (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (2-6 7-6(5) 6-4) – See score progression
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Michael ZhengZheng (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-4 2-6 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Charles BroomBroom (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – Marc PolmansPolmans (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete – Paul JubbJubb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Terence AtmaneAtmane – Micah BraswellBraswell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriel DialloDiallo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction