![Prediction And Head To Head Mohamed Safwat Vs. Mario Gonzalez Fernandez 3hjjoivq7d Prediction and head to head Mohamed Safwat vs. Mario Gonzalez Fernandez](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Mohamed-Safwat-vs.-Mario-Gonzalez-Fernandez-3hjjOIvQ7d.jpg)
Mohamed Safwat and Mario Gonzalez Fernandez will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Segovia Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 7:00 pm on PISTA PEDRO MUNOZ. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Mohamed Safwat who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Mohamed Safwat is the pick to win this match.
Mohamed Safwat -> 1.54
Mario Gonzalez Fernandez -> 2.375
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Mohamed Safwat vs. Mario Gonzalez Fernandez
There is no head to head record between Mohamed Safwat and Mario Gonzalez Fernandez since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Mohamed Safwat
![](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pictrademark-e1610287677768.png)
![Mohamed Safwat](https://tennistonic.com/engine/handlers/players_images_new/4756Mohamed-Safwat.jpg)
22 - 13win/loss
382
130
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 23-15 | 11-3 | 12-11 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 61-28 | 36-10 | 24-16 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 25-24 | 2-6 | 22-15 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 10-24 | 1-2 | 5-14 | 3-7 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2020 | 16-16 | 11-9 | 3-4 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 397, Mohamed got to the 2nd round after defeating Jules Marie 7-6(2) 6-4.
In the 1st round, Safwat had a good straight sets win against Marie (7-62 6-4). During the match, Safwat scored 71 points vs Marie’s 63. The Egyptian was quite aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Regarding the service games, Safwat struck 9 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Mohamed Safwat was quite effective on serve to win 82% (32/39) of his 1st serve and 66% (19/29) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Safwat broke Marie once after converting 33% of his break points (1/3).
Safwat has positive record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (356-258). 11-3 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Safwat has a compiled 182-96 match record in the last years on hard.
Safwat’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Sharm ElSheikh.
Safwat has an overall 22-13 win-loss record in 2024, 11-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Segovia Challenger
Mario Gonzalez Fernandez
![](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pictrademark-e1610287677768.png)
![Mario Gonzalez Fernandez](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/players_nophoto.gif)
35 - 19win/loss
597
597
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 39-22 | 25-12 | 14-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 42-27 | 27-15 | 15-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 29-21 | 26-16 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 19-19 | 7-7 | 12-12 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 9-6 | 8-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 669, Gonzalez reached the 2nd round after defeating Lorenzo Joaquin Rodriguez 6-4 6-3.
In the 1st round, Mario had a good straight sets win against Joaquin Rodriguez (6-4 6-3). During the match Gonzalez scored 68 points vs Joaquin Rodriguez’s 53. Mario was very aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about serving, Gonzalez struck 6 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Mario Gonzalez Fernandez was quite efficient on serve to win 78% (29/37) of his 1st serve and 57% (13/23) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Spaniard broke Joaquin Rodriguez 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Gonzalez’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Casablanca and M15 Tanger.
Gonzalez has a compiled 35-19 win-loss record in 2024, 21-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Safwat | Gonzalez |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 23 | 19 |
Pts | 71-63 | 68-53 |
Total Points | 134 | 121 |
Winners | 32 | 29 |
%Winners | 45% | 43% |
Both Safwat and Gonzalez played 1 match. Both players have not surrendered a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Safwat and Gonzalez have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Safwat played 4 games more than Gonzalez. Mohamed scored 32 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, Gonzalez recorded 29 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Safwat | Gonzalez |
---|---|---|
Aces | 9 | 6 |
Avg per match | 9 | 6 |
1st in | 39/68 | 37/60 |
%1st in | 57% | 62% |
1st pts | 32/39 | 29/37 |
%1st pts | 82% | 78% |
2nd pts | 19/29 | 13/23 |
%2nd pts | 66% | 57% |
Safwat recorded 9 aces . Gonzalez struck 6 aces . Safwat won 82% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 66% of the points. On the other side, Gonzalez won 78% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Safwat | Gonzalez |
---|---|---|
Won | 1 | 3 |
Converted | 1/3 | 3/4 |
% Converted | 33% | 75% |
Conceded | 1 | 4 |
Saved | 1 | 4 |
% Saved | 100% | 100% |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Safwat broke his opponent once with a 33% conversion rate. The Egyptian extremely effective on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points. Gonzalez broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Mario was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 4 break points.
Safwat | |||
R1 Marie |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-62 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
pts | 71-63 | 71-63 | |
Total points | 134 | 134 | |
Winners | 32 | 32 | |
%Winners | 45% | 45% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 9 | 9 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 39/68 | 39/68 | |
% 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
1st pts | 32/39 | 32/39 | |
% 1st pts | 82% | 82% | |
2nd pts | 19/29 | 19/29 | |
% 2nd pts | 66% | 66% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 1 | 1 | |
Converted | 1/3 | 1/3 | |
Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Gonzalez | |||
R1 Joaquin Rodriguez |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 68-53 | 68-53 | |
Total points | 121 | 121 | |
Winners | 29 | 29 | |
%Winners | 43% | 43% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 6 | 6 | |
Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
1st in | 37/60 | 37/60 | |
% 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
1st pts | 29/37 | 29/37 | |
% 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
2nd pts | 13/23 | 13/23 | |
% 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 3 | 3 | |
Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 4/4 | 4 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Tennis Scores in Segovia Challenger
- Max WiskandtWiskandt – Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Mohamed SafwatSafwat – Jules MarieMarie (7-62 6-4) – See score progression
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Laurent LokoliLokoli (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Alex MartinezMartinez – Ivan Marrero CurbeloMarrero Curbelo (3-6 7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- John EcheverriaEcheverria – August HolmgrenHolmgren (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Jie CuiCui – Robin BertrandBertrand (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Edas ButvilasButvilas – Alberto Barroso CamposBarroso Campos (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Arthur WeberWeber – Daniel Merida AguilarMerida Aguilar (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona – Alejo Sanchez QuilezSanchez Quilez (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Alibek KachmazovKachmazov – Inaki Montes-De La TorreMontes-De La Torre (3-6 7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Mario Gonzalez FernandezGonzalez Fernandez – Lorenzo Joaquin RodriguezJoaquin Rodriguez (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Iliyan RadulovRadulov (7-6(2) 6-1) – See score progression
- Edas ButvilasButvilas – Alberto Barroso CamposBarroso Campos (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Jie CuiCui – Robin BertrandBertrand (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Laurent LokoliLokoli (6-4 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Dan AddedAdded – Adria Soriano BarreraSoriano Barrera (7-6(5) 6-4) – See score progression
- Egor GerasimovGerasimov – Fabrizio AndaloroAndaloro (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- John EcheverriaEcheverria – August HolmgrenHolmgren (7-5 6-4) – See score progression
- Alex MartinezMartinez – Ivan Marrero CurbeloMarrero Curbelo (3-6 7-6(4) 6-3) – See score progression
- Mohamed SafwatSafwat – Jules MarieMarie (7-6(2) 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin LockLock – Vadym UrsuUrsu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Dan AddedAdded (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GautierGautier – Miguel DamasDamas (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona – Egor GerasimovGerasimov (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- John EcheverriaEcheverria – Alex MartinezMartinez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur WeberWeber – Jie CuiCui (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mario Gonzalez FernandezGonzalez Fernandez – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (0-0) – H2H and prediction