Matthew Dellavedova and Jakub Paul will play each other in the qualifications of the Zug Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 11:30 am on JEGO COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jakub Paul who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jakub Paul is the pick to win this match.
Jakub Paul -> 1.36
Matthew Dellavedova -> 2.98
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Matthew Dellavedova vs. Jakub Paul
This will be the 2nd time that Matthew Dellavedova and Jakub Paul clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Paul (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they played each other, Paul won 6-4 6-1 in the quarter in M25 Sarajevo back in June 2024.
Matthew Dellavedova
28 - 25win/loss
357
356
LWWLWLWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 49-40 | 15-14 | 33-23 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 55-35 | 35-17 | 15-15 | 1-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 63-40 | 56-29 | 7-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 32-33 | 18-18 | 14-12 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 406 (career-high), Dellavedova got to the qualifications after defeating Andrin Casanova 6-4 3-6 6-4.
In the qualifications, Dellavedova defeated Casanova (6-4 3-6 6-4). During the match, Dellavedova scored 104 points vs Casanova’s 101. The Australian was very aggressive to blast 51 winners.
Talking about the service games, Dellavedova recorded 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Matthew Dellavedova lost the serve 3 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Dellavedova put 70% of his first serves in, winning 60% (51/85) of the points behind his 1st serve and 57% (21/37) on the 2nd serve. Matthew broke Casanova 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Dellavedova has a winning record in the last 9 years having won 54% of his matches (252-211). 23-15 on clay in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Dellavedova has an aggregate119-100 match record in the last 9 years on clay.
The Australian’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Kursumlijska Banja.
The Australian has a compiled 28-25 win-loss record in 2024, 23-15 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Zug Challenger
Matthew has never competed in this tournament before.
Jakub Paul
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 42-25 | 13-7 | 17-11 | 12-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-24 | 20-4 | 14-12 | 2-6 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| 2022 | 25-26 | 4-4 | 20-18 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 34-21 | 4-3 | 17-10 | 11-7 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2020 | 9-10 | 4-4 | 1-2 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
Ranked no. 460, the Swiss reached the qualifications after defeating Johan Nikles 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications, The Swiss had a good straight sets win against Nikles (6-4 6-3). During the match Paul scored 62 points vs Nikles’s 46. Jakub was pretty aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, Paul scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he was pretty steady in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Jakub Paul was extremely effective on serve to win 73% (27/37) of his 1st serve and 68% (15/22) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Swiss broke Nikles 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Paul’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M15 Monastir and M25 Sarajevo.
Paul has an overall 24-17 win-loss record in 2024, 11-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Dellavedova | Paul |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 29 | 19 |
| Pts | 104-101 | 62-46 |
| Total Points | 205 | 108 |
| Winners | 51 | 27 |
| %Winners | 49% | 44% |
Both Dellavedova and Paul played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Matthew Dellavedova surrendered 1 set while Jakub Paul hasn’t dropped a set so far. Dellavedova has played 1 set more than Paul (3 vs 2). Therefore, Dellavedova played 10 games more than Paul. The Australian scored 51 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, The Swiss bagged 27 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Dellavedova | Paul |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 1 |
| 1st in | 85/122 | 37/59 |
| %1st in | 70% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 51/85 | 27/37 |
| %1st pts | 60% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 21/37 | 15/22 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 68% |
Dellavedova made 6 aces . Paul bagged 1 ace . Dellavedova won 60% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Paul won 73% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 68% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Dellavedova | Paul |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 3 |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/4 |
| % Converted | 43% | 75% |
| Conceded | 9 | 2 |
| Saved | 6 | 1 |
| % Saved | 67% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 1 |
Dellavedova broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. The Australian conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded. Jakub broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Paul conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Dellavedova | |||
| Q1 Casanova |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 104-101 | 104-101 | |
| Total points | 205 | 205 | |
| Winners | 51 | 51 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 49% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 85/122 | 85/122 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 51/85 | 51/85 | |
| % 1st pts | 60% | 60% | |
| 2nd pts | 21/37 | 21/37 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 6/9 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Paul | |||
| Q1 Nikles |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 62-46 | 62-46 | |
| Total points | 108 | 108 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 37/59 | 37/59 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 27/37 | 27/37 | |
| % 1st pts | 73% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/22 | 15/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 68% | 68% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWLWWWW
WWLWLWWWWL 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Benoit PairePaire – Quentin HalysHalys (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Joris De LooreDe Loore – Maxime JanvierJanvier (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omar JasikaJasika – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Remy BertolaBertola – Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Matteo MartineauMartineau – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Damien WengerWenger – Vladyslav OrlovOrlov (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matthew DellavedovaDellavedova – Jakub PaulPaul (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jurij RodionovRodionov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mateus De Carvalho CardosoDe Carvalho Cardoso – Maxence BeaugeBeauge (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan NijboerNijboer – Jesse FloresFlores (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Raul Joel Andrin TeichmannJoel Andrin Teichmann – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
