![Prediction And Head To Head Li Tu Vs. Jacob Fearnley Ut71z8em4g Prediction and head to head Li Tu vs. Jacob Fearnley](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Li-Tu-vs.-Jacob-Fearnley-UT71Z8eM4G.jpg)
Li Tu and Jacob Fearnley will face off in the qualifications of the Infosys Hall of Fame Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 11:00 am on COURT 2. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jacob Fearnley who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jacob Fearnley is the pick to win this match.
Jacob Fearnley -> 1.36
Li Tu -> 2.98
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Li Tu vs. Jacob Fearnley
There is no head to head record between Li Tu and Jacob Fearnley since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Li Tu
![](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pictrademark-e1610287677768.png)
![Li Tu](https://tennistonic.com/engine/handlers/players_images_new/Li-Tu.jpg)
18 - 15win/loss
208
186
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 18-15 | 14-10 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 38-32 | 29-19 | 0-3 | 3-6 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 50-25 | 34-16 | 15-6 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 41-7 | 28-4 | 0-0 | 13-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 208, Li got to the qualifications after defeating Charles Broom 6-1 7-5.
In the qualifications, Tu had a good straight sets win against Broom (6-1 7-5). During the match, Tu scored 73 points vs Broom’s 49. The Australian was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Regarding the service games, Tu bagged 10 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Li Tu lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Tu put 63% of his first serves in, winning 68% (30/44) of the points behind his 1st serve and 65% (17/26) on the 2nd serve. Li broke Broom 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Tu has a solid record in the last 5 years having won 65% of his matches (147-80). 3-4 on grass in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Tu has a compiled9-9 record in the last 5 years on grass.
Li’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Traralgon.
Li has an aggregate 18-15 win-loss record in 2024, 3-4 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Newport
Jacob Fearnley
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 17-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 8-0 | 9-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 17-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 16-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 231 (career-high), the Brit got to the qualifications after beating Gijs Brouwer 4-6 6-3 6-2 and Li Tu .
In the qualifications against Brouwer, Fearnley recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 6-2). During the match Fearnley scored 88 points vs Brouwer’s 75. Jacob was quite aggressive to blast 39 winners.
Talking about serving, Fearnley blasted 11 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Jacob Fearnley lost the serve 3 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Fearnley put 58% of his first serves in, winning 75% (39/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (17/38) on the 2nd serve. Jacob broke Brouwer 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
His best result of the season was winning the title the Nottingham 2 Challenger where he beat Charles Broom in the final 4-6 6-4 6-3.
The Brit has a compiled 17-2 win-loss record in 2024, 9-2 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Newport
Fearnley has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Tu | Fearnley |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 19 | 27 |
Pts | 73-49 | 88-75 |
Total Points | 122 | 163 |
Winners | 30 | 39 |
%Winners | 41% | 44% |
Both Tu and Fearnley played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Jacob Fearnley dropped 1 set while Li Tu hasn’t lost a set so far. Tu has played 1 set(s) less than Fearnley (2 vs 3). Therefore, Tu played 8 games less than Fearnley. The Australian scored 30 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Jacob struck 39 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Tu | Fearnley |
---|---|---|
Aces | 10 | 11 |
Avg per match | 10 | 11 |
1st in | 44/70 | 52/90 |
%1st in | 63% | 58% |
1st pts | 30/44 | 39/52 |
%1st pts | 68% | 75% |
2nd pts | 17/26 | 17/38 |
%2nd pts | 65% | 45% |
Tu scored 10 aces . Fearnley made 11 aces . Tu won 68% points on his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 65% of the points. On the other side, Fearnley won 75% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Tu | Fearnley |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 5 |
Converted | 4/8 | 5/6 |
% Converted | 50% | 83% |
Conceded | 2 | 5 |
Saved | 1 | 2 |
% Saved | 50% | 40% |
Times Broken | 1 | 3 |
Tu broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Australian lost his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Fearnley broke his opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. Fearnley conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 40% of the break points that he conceded.
Tu | |||
Q1 Broom |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
pts | 73-49 | 73-49 | |
Total points | 122 | 122 | |
Winners | 30 | 30 | |
%Winners | 41% | 41% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 10 | 10 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 44/70 | 44/70 | |
% 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
1st pts | 30/44 | 30/44 | |
% 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
2nd pts | 17/26 | 17/26 | |
% 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Fearnley | |||
Q1 Brouwer |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
pts | 88-75 | 88-75 | |
Total points | 163 | 163 | |
Winners | 39 | 39 | |
%Winners | 44% | 44% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 11 | 11 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
1st in | 52/90 | 52/90 | |
% 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
1st pts | 39/52 | 39/52 | |
% 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
2nd pts | 17/38 | 17/38 | |
% 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
Saved | 2/5 | 2 | |
Saved % | 40% | 40% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Maxime CressyCressy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Rinky HijikataHijikata (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Reilly OpelkaOpelka (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alex BoltBolt – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Emilio NavaNava (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Marc PolmansPolmans (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Li TuTu (0-0) – H2H and prediction