![Prediction And Head To Head Tristan Schoolkate Vs. Marc Polmans Rx91vgvvav Prediction and head to head Tristan Schoolkate vs. Marc Polmans](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Prediction-and-head-to-head-Tristan-Schoolkate-vs.-Marc-Polmans-Rx91vGvVav.jpg)
Tristan Schoolkate and Marc Polmans will square off in the qualifications of the Infosys Hall of Fame Open for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 1:30 pm on COURT 2. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Tristan Schoolkate who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Tristan Schoolkate is the pick to win this match.
Tristan Schoolkate -> 1.41
Marc Polmans -> 2.76
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tristan Schoolkate vs. Marc Polmans
This will be the 3rd time that Tristan Schoolkate and Marc Polmans play each other. The head to head is 2-0 for Polmans (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on grass.
The last time that they played each other, Polmans won 6-3 2-6 6-2 in the 1st round in the Mexico City Challenger back in April 2024.
Tristan Schoolkate
![](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pictrademark-e1610287677768.png)
![Tristan Schoolkate](https://tennistonic.com/engine/handlers/players_images_new/8440Tristan-Schoolkate.jpg)
28 - 19win/loss
190
176
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 28-19 | 22-13 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 44-30 | 30-23 | 4-4 | 2-2 | 8-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 48-29 | 24-15 | 17-11 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 24-20 | 8-9 | 3-5 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
2020 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 190, Tristan got to the qualifications after beating James Kent Trotter 6-2 6-3 and Marc Polmans .
In the qualifications, Schoolkate had a good straight sets win against Kent Trotter (6-2 6-3). During the match, Schoolkate scored 64 points vs Kent Trotter’s 44. The Australian was very aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Talking about the service games, Schoolkate scored 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Tristan Schoolkate was extremely efficient on serve to win 86% (18/21) of his 1st serve and 60% (12/20) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Australian broke Kent Trotter 5 times after converting 31% of his break points (5/16).
Schoolkate has a winning win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 59% of his matches (154-107). 6-4 on grass in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Schoolkate has a composed21-9 record in the last 6 years on grass.
His best result of the season was winning the title the Guangzhou Challenger where he overcame Adam Walton in the final 6-3 3-6 6-3.
The Australian has an overall 28-19 win-loss record in 2024, 6-4 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Newport
Tristan has never competed in this tournament before.
Marc Polmans
![](https://tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/pictrademark-e1610287677768.png)
![Marc Polmans](https://tennistonic.com/engine/handlers/players_images_new/Marc-Polmans.jpg)
9 - 15win/loss
217
116
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 9-15 | 4-7 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
2023 | 50-35 | 32-23 | 14-9 | 2-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 18-13 | 14-12 | 0-0 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 15-28 | 1-6 | 8-13 | 2-6 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 11-16 | 2-6 | 5-4 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 217, Polmans reached the qualifications after beating Adhithya Ganesan 6-2 6-2.
In the qualifications, Marc had a good straight sets win against Ganesan (6-2 6-2). During the match Polmans scored 53 points vs Ganesan’s 35. Marc was pretty aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Talking about serving, Polmans bagged 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Marc Polmans was pretty efficient on serve to win 80% (20/25) of his 1st serve and 62% (8/13) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Marc broke Ganesan 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Polmans’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Sarasota Challenger.
Polmans has a compiled 9-15 win-loss record in 2024, 1-4 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Schoolkate | Polmans |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 17 | 16 |
Pts | 64-44 | 53-35 |
Total Points | 108 | 88 |
Winners | 18 | 20 |
%Winners | 28% | 38% |
Both Schoolkate and Polmans played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Schoolkate and Polmans have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Schoolkate played 1 game more than Polmans. Tristan scored 18 winners (28% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian bagged 20 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Schoolkate | Polmans |
---|---|---|
Aces | 3 | 3 |
Avg per match | 3 | 3 |
1st in | 21/41 | 25/38 |
%1st in | 51% | 66% |
1st pts | 18/21 | 20/25 |
%1st pts | 86% | 80% |
2nd pts | 12/20 | 8/13 |
%2nd pts | 60% | 62% |
Schoolkate struck 3 aces . Polmans blasted 3 aces . Schoolkate won 86% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Polmans won 80% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Schoolkate | Polmans |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 5 |
Converted | 5/16 | 5/8 |
% Converted | 31% | 63% |
Conceded | 1 | 1 |
Saved | 0 | 0 |
% Saved | 0% | 0% |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
The Australian broke his opponent 5 times with a 31% conversion rate. Schoolkate conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Marc broke his opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Polmans conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
Schoolkate | |||
Q1 Kent |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
pts | 64-44 | 64-44 | |
Total points | 108 | 108 | |
Winners | 18 | 18 | |
%Winners | 28% | 28% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 21/41 | 21/41 | |
% 1st in | 51% | 51% | |
1st pts | 18/21 | 18/21 | |
% 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
2nd pts | 12/20 | 12/20 | |
% 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/16 | 5/16 | |
Converted % | 31% | 31% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Polmans | |||
Q1 Ganesan |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 16 | 16 | |
pts | 53-35 | 53-35 | |
Total points | 88 | 88 | |
Winners | 20 | 20 | |
%Winners | 38% | 38% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 3 | 3 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 25/38 | 25/38 | |
% 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
1st pts | 20/25 | 20/25 | |
% 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
2nd pts | 8/13 | 8/13 | |
% 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
![](https://www.tennistonic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Capture1234.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
![](https://tennistonic.com/_graphics/next-arrow.png)
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Radu AlbotAlbot – Maxime CressyCressy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Rinky HijikataHijikata (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Constant LestienneLestienne – Reilly OpelkaOpelka (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Alex BoltBolt – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Billy HarrisHarris – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Emilio NavaNava (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Marc PolmansPolmans (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jacob FearnleyFearnley – Li TuTu (0-0) – H2H and prediction