Tibo Colson and Deney Wassermann will square off in the qualifications of the Amersfoort Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 1:30 pm on VAN MOSSEL KIA COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Deney Wassermann who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Deney Wassermann is the pick to win this match.
Deney Wassermann -> 1.42
Tibo Colson -> 2.73
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tibo Colson vs. Deney Wassermann
There is no head to head record between Tibo Colson and Deney Wassermann since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Tibo Colson
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 11-15 | 0-0 | 6-8 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2023 | 42-23 | 2-2 | 15-12 | 25-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-21 | 8-3 | 16-13 | 12-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-16 | 12-8 | 1-4 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 509, the Belgian reached the qualifications after beating Adolfo Daniel Vallejo 7-6(3) 6-3 and Deney Wassermann .
In the qualifications, Colson had a good straight sets win against Daniel Vallejo (7-63 6-3). During the match, Colson scored 79 points vs Daniel Vallejo’s 65. The Belgian was very aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about the service games, Colson made 18 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Tibo Colson lost the serve once. Furthermore, Colson put 61% of his first serves in, winning 86% (36/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (13/27) on the 2nd serve. Tibo broke Daniel Vallejo twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Colson has a winning record in the last 5 years having won 59% of his matches (109-77). 6-8 on clay in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Colson has a compiled38-37 match record in the last 5 years on clay.
The Belgian’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in M25 Rabat.
Colson has a compiled 11-15 win-loss record in 2024, 6-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Amersfoort Challenger
Deney Wassermann
18 - 9win/loss
726
696
WWLWWWWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18-9 | 4-3 | 14-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-20 | 7-7 | 20-13 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-15 | 4-2 | 21-12 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 25-17 | 3-3 | 22-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
Ranked no. 726, Wassermann reached the qualifications after beating Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva 4-6 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications against Lucas Reis Da, Wassermann recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 6-4). During the match Wassermann scored 91 points vs Lucas Reis Da’s 88. The Dutch was very aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Talking about serving, Wassermann made 10 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Overall, Deney Wassermann was very efficient on serve to win 79% (38/48) of his 1st serve and 51% (28/55) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Dutch broke Lucas Reis Da 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Deney’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Alkmaar.
The Dutch has a compiled 17-9 win-loss record in 2024, 13-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Amersfoort Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2021 and 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Colson | Wassermann |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 29 |
| Pts | 79-65 | 91-88 |
| Total Points | 144 | 179 |
| Winners | 36 | 38 |
| %Winners | 46% | 42% |
Both Colson and Wassermann played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Deney Wassermann conceded 1 set while Tibo Colson hasn’t lost a set so far. Colson has played 1 set(s) less than Wassermann (2 vs 3). Therefore, Colson played 7 games less than Wassermann. Tibo scored 36 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Deney bagged 38 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Colson | Wassermann |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 18 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 18 | 10 |
| 1st in | 42/69 | 48/103 |
| %1st in | 61% | 47% |
| 1st pts | 36/42 | 38/48 |
| %1st pts | 86% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 13/27 | 28/55 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 51% |
Colson blasted 18 aces . Wassermann recorded 10 aces . Colson won 86% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Wassermann won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Colson | Wassermann |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 3 |
| Converted | 2/5 | 3/4 |
| % Converted | 40% | 75% |
| Conceded | 1 | 5 |
| Saved | 0 | 3 |
| % Saved | 0% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
Colson broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. Tibo lost his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. The Dutch broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. The Dutch conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Colson | |||
| Q1 Daniel |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 79-65 | 79-65 | |
| Total points | 144 | 144 | |
| Winners | 36 | 36 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 18 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 42/69 | 42/69 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 36/42 | 36/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/27 | 13/27 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Wassermann | |||
| Q1 Lucas Reis Da |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 29 | 29 | |
| pts | 91-88 | 91-88 | |
| Total points | 179 | 179 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 48/103 | 48/103 | |
| % 1st in | 47% | 47% | |
| 1st pts | 38/48 | 38/48 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 28/55 | 28/55 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
WLLWLLLWWW
WWLWWWWWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Alvaro Guillen MezaGuillen Meza (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo DellienDellien – Jiri VeselyVesely (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joris De LooreDe Loore – Bernabe Zapata MirallesZapata Miralles (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omar JasikaJasika – Zsombor PirosPiros (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco – Alec DeckersDeckers (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera – Jurij RodionovRodionov (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moez EcharguiEchargui – Jelle SelsSels (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – Jay ClarkeClarke (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Manuel CerundoloManuel Cerundolo – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabi Adrian BoitanAdrian Boitan – Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexey ZakharovZakharov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tibo ColsonColson – Deney WassermannWassermann (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kyrian JacquetJacquet – Benjamin HassanHassan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
