Botic Van De Zandschulp and Henri Squire will face off in the quarter of the Braunschweig Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 11:00 am on BRAWO CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Botic Van De Zandschulp is the pick to win this match.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.51
Henri Squire -> 2.41
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Botic Van De Zandschulp vs. Henri Squire
There is no head to head record between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Henri Squire since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
15 - 19win/loss
80
22
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 33-33 | 9-11 | 16-12 | 7-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 19-14 | 1-2 | 6-6 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
Ranked no. 97, Botic reached the quarter after beating Matteo Martineau 6-2 6-4, Benjamin Hassan 6-1 6-2 and Henri Squire .
In the 2nd round, Botic had a good straight sets win against Hassan (6-1 6-2). During the match, Van De Zandschulp scored 56 points vs Hassan’s 34. The Dutch was extremely aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Regarding the service games, Van De Zandschulp scored 3 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Botic Van De Zandschulp conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 4 break points. Furthermore, Van De Zandschulp put 66% of his first serves in, winning 70% (23/33) of the points behind his 1st serve and 76% (13/17) on the 2nd serve. Botic broke Hassan 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Van De Zandschulp hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this event to win 62% of the points he played.
Van De Zandschulp has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 63% of his matches (328-193). 9-8 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Van De Zandschulp has a composed 153-90 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
The Dutch has a composed 15-19 win-loss record in 2024, 9-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Braunschweig Challenger
Henri Squire
33 - 21win/loss
178
169
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 41-31 | 1-3 | 21-13 | 19-12 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 54-38 | 7-4 | 30-25 | 15-6 | 1-2 | 1-1 |
2022 | 38-31 | 1-2 | 8-11 | 27-16 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 30-12 | 0-0 | 21-8 | 4-1 | 0-0 | 5-3 |
2020 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 178 (career-high), Henri got to the quarter after beating Daniel Masur 5-7 7-6(4) 7-6(5) and Max Hans Rehberg 6-7(4) 6-2 6-4.
In the 2nd round against Hans Rehberg, The German recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-74 6-2 6-4). During the match Squire scored 105 points vs Hans Rehberg’s 95. Henri was very aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about serving, Squire struck 9 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Henri Squire lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Squire put 59% of his first serves in, winning 67% (40/60) of the points behind his 1st serve and 54% (22/41) on the 2nd serve. Henri broke Hans Rehberg 6 times after converting 60% of his break points (6/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Henri has conceded 2 set in the tournament to win 51% of the points he played.
His best result of the current year was winning the title the Hamburg Challenger where he defeated Clement Chidekh in the final 6-4 6-2.
The German has an overall 33-21 win-loss record in 2024, 16-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Braunschweig Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Van De Zandschulp | Squire |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 2 |
Tot Set | 4 | 6 |
Tot Games | 33 | 69 |
Pts | 117-73 | 227-218 |
Total Points | 190 | 445 |
Winners | 47 | 104 |
%Winners | 40% | 46% |
Both Van De Zandschulp and Squire played 2 matches. At the moment, Henri Squire conceded 2 sets while Botic Van De Zandschulp hasn’t conceded a set so far. Van De Zandschulp has played 2 set(s) less than Squire (4 vs 6). Therefore, Van De Zandschulp played 36 games less than Squire. Van De Zandschulp scored 47 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, The German bagged 104 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Van De Zandschulp | Squire |
---|---|---|
Aces | 8 | 23 |
Avg per match | 4 | 11.5 |
1st in | 60/92 | 144/231 |
%1st in | 65% | 62% |
1st pts | 47/60 | 104/144 |
%1st pts | 78% | 72% |
2nd pts | 25/32 | 44/87 |
%2nd pts | 78% | 51% |
Van De Zandschulp scored 8 aces (4 per match). Squire made 23 aces (11.5 per match). Van De Zandschulp won 78% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 78% of the points. On the other side, Squire won 72% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Van De Zandschulp | Squire |
---|---|---|
Won | 7 | 7 |
Converted | 7/19 | 7/13 |
% Converted | 37% | 54% |
Conceded | 4 | 15 |
Saved | 4 | 10 |
% Saved | 100% | 67% |
Times Broken | 0 | 5 |
Botic broke his opponents 7 times with a 37% conversion rate. Van De Zandschulp pretty effective on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 4 break points. The German broke his opponents 7 times with a 54% conversion rate. Henri conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
Van De Zandschulp | ||||
R1 Martineau |
R2 Hassan |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-4 | 6-1 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 15 | 33 | |
pts | 61-39 | 56-34 | 117-73 | |
Total points | 100 | 90 | 190 | |
Winners | 24 | 23 | 47 | |
%Winners | 39% | 41% | 40% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 5 | 3 | 8 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
1st in | 27/42 | 33/50 | 60/92 | |
% 1st in | 64% | 66% | 65% | |
1st pts | 24/27 | 23/33 | 47/60 | |
% 1st pts | 89% | 70% | 78% | |
2nd pts | 12/15 | 13/17 | 25/32 | |
% 2nd pts | 80% | 76% | 78% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
Converted | 3/11 | 4/8 | 7/19 | |
Converted % | 27% | 50% | 37% | |
Conceded | 0 | 4 | 4 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 4/4 | 4 | |
Saved % | – | 100% | 50% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Squire | ||||
R1 Masur |
R2 Hans |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 5-7 7-64 7-65 | 6-74 6-2 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 38 | 31 | 69 | |
pts | 122-123 | 105-95 | 227-218 | |
Total points | 245 | 200 | 445 | |
Winners | 64 | 40 | 104 | |
%Winners | 52% | 38% | 46% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 14 | 9 | 23 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
1st in | 84/130 | 60/101 | 144/231 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 59% | 62% | |
1st pts | 64/84 | 40/60 | 104/144 | |
% 1st pts | 76% | 67% | 72% | |
2nd pts | 22/46 | 22/41 | 44/87 | |
% 2nd pts | 48% | 54% | 51% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 1 | 6 | 7 | |
Converted | 1/3 | 6/10 | 7/13 | |
Converted % | 33% | 60% | 54% | |
Conceded | 9 | 6 | 15 | |
Saved | 7/9 | 3/6 | 10 | |
Saved % | 78% | 50% | 64% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Christian GarinGarin (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Henri SquireSquire (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Pedro CachinCachin (1-0) – H2H and prediction