Botic Van De Zandschulp and Benjamin Hassan will square off in the 2nd round of the Braunschweig Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 1:00 pm on COURT 11. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Botic Van De Zandschulp is the pick to win this match.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.44
Benjamin Hassan -> 2.66
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Botic Van De Zandschulp vs. Benjamin Hassan
This will be the 2nd time that Botic Van De Zandschulp and Benjamin Hassan play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Van De Zandschulp (see full H2H stats), but they have never competed against each other on clay.
The last time that they squared off, Van De Zandschulp won 6-3 6-4 in the quarter in M25 Nussloch back in 2019.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
14 - 19win/loss
80
22
LWWLLWWWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-33 | 9-11 | 16-12 | 7-8 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-14 | 1-2 | 6-6 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
Ranked no. 97, Botic got to the 2nd round after defeating Matteo Martineau 6-2 6-4 and Benjamin Hassan .
In the 1st round, Botic had a good straight sets win against Martineau (6-2 6-4). During the match, Van De Zandschulp scored 61 points vs Martineau’s 39. The Dutch was quite aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about the service games, Van De Zandschulp fired 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Botic Van De Zandschulp was exceptionally effective on serve to win 89% (24/27) of his 1st serve and 80% (12/15) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Dutch broke Martineau 3 times after converting 27% of his break points (3/11).
Van De Zandschulp has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 63% of his matches (327-193). 8-8 on clay in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Van De Zandschulp has an aggregate 152-90 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
Van De Zandschulp has an overall 14-19 win-loss record in 2024, 8-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Braunschweig Challenger
Benjamin Hassan
18 - 21win/loss
218
143
LWWLWWWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 38-39 | 8-12 | 20-16 | 9-9 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 57-33 | 11-6 | 35-20 | 10-6 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 36-29 | 7-3 | 21-16 | 8-9 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2021 | 21-23 | 2-2 | 17-16 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 154, will start his run in the Braunschweig Challenger after he played his last match in the Braunschweig Challenger where he defeated 6-1 6-4 to Geerts in the 1st round on the 9th of July.
Hassan has an aggregate 17-21 win-loss record in 2024, 12-10 on clay (See FULL STATS).
The Lebanese’s best result of the year was reaching the semifinal in the Girona Challenger.
In terms of his career, The Lebanese has an overall 258-176 record. He has a positive 157-99 record on clay.
Previously in the Braunschweig Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the semifinal in 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Van De Zandschulp | Hassan |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 17 |
| Pts | 61-39 | 64-47 |
| Total Points | 100 | 111 |
| Winners | 24 | 26 |
| %Winners | 39% | 41% |
Both Van De Zandschulp and Hassan played 1 match. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Van De Zandschulp and Hassan have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Van De Zandschulp played 1 game more than Hassan. Van De Zandschulp scored 24 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, The Lebanese blasted 26 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Van De Zandschulp | Hassan |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 7 |
| 1st in | 27/42 | 34/63 |
| %1st in | 64% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 24/27 | 26/34 |
| %1st pts | 89% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 12/15 | 16/29 |
| %2nd pts | 80% | 55% |
Van De Zandschulp made 5 aces . Hassan bagged 7 aces . Van De Zandschulp won 89% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 80% of the points. On the other side, Hassan won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Van De Zandschulp | Hassan |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 3 |
| Converted | 3/11 | 3/6 |
| % Converted | 27% | 50% |
| Conceded | 0 | 2 |
| Saved | 0 | 2 |
| % Saved | 0% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
The Dutch broke his opponent 3 times with a 27% conversion rate. Botic quite strong on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 0 break points. Hassan broke his opponent 3 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Lebanese was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
| Van De Zandschulp | |||
| R1 Martineau |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 61-39 | 61-39 | |
| Total points | 100 | 100 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 27/42 | 27/42 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 24/27 | 24/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 89% | 89% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/15 | 12/15 | |
| % 2nd pts | 80% | 80% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/11 | 3/11 | |
| Converted % | 27% | 27% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Hassan | |||
| Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | |||
| Tot Set | 0 | ||
| Tot Games | 0 | ||
| pts | 0-0 | ||
| Total points | 0 | ||
| Winners | 0 | ||
| %Winners | 0% | ||
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | ||
| Double Faults | 0 | ||
| 1st in | 0/0 | ||
| % 1st in | 0% | ||
| 1st pts | 0/0 | ||
| % 1st pts | 0% | ||
| 2nd pts | 0/0 | ||
| % 2nd pts | 0% | ||
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 0 | ||
| Converted | 0/0 | ||
| Converted % | 0% | ||
| Conceded | 0 | ||
| Saved | 0 | ||
| Saved % | 0% | ||
| Times Broken | 0 | ||
Head 2 Head
LWWLLWWWLL
LWWLWWWLWW Tennis Scores in Braunschweig Challenger
- Lukas KleinKlein – Jozef KovalikKovalik (6-73 7-63 6-1) – See score progression
- Max Hans RehbergHans Rehberg – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (2-6 7-61 6-3) – See score progression
- Cristian GarinGarin – Matej DodigDodig (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Henri SquireSquire – Daniel MasurMasur (5-7 7-64 7-65) – See score progression
- Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert – Tom GentzschGentzsch (2-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Stijn SlumpSlump (6-4 7-611) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Felipe Meligeni AlvesMeligeni Alves (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Matteo MartineauMartineau (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Jurij RodionovRodionov (3-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Carlos Sanchez JoverSanchez Jover – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (6-1 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (6-2 1-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Pedro CachinCachin – Gregoire BarrereBarrere (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Rudolf MollekerMolleker (6-1 2-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Lukas KleinKlein – Jozef KovalikKovalik (6-7(3) 7-6(3) 6-1) – See score progression
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Jurij RodionovRodionov (3-6 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Cristian GarinGarin – Matej DodigDodig (4-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (6-2 1-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert – Tom GentzschGentzsch (2-6 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Stijn SlumpSlump (6-4 7-6(11)) – See score progression
- Carlos Sanchez JoverSanchez Jover – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (6-1 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Matteo MartineauMartineau (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Benjamin HassanHassan – Michael GeertsGeerts (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Henri SquireSquire – Daniel MasurMasur (5-7 7-6(4) 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Max Hans RehbergHans Rehberg – Daniel AltmaierAltmaier (2-6 7-6(1) 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Marvin MoellerMoeller (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Sumit NagalNagal – Felipe Meligeni AlvesMeligeni Alves (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Christian GarinGarin (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena – Lukas KleinKlein (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro CachinCachin – Sumit NagalNagal (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Benjamin HassanHassan (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas – Sebastian FanselowFanselow (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Pierre-Hugues HerbertHerbert (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Carlos Sanchez JoverSanchez Jover (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Henri SquireSquire – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
