Bernard Tomic and Quinn Vandecasteele will square off in the 2nd round of the Bloomfield Hills Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 1:30 pm on STADIUM. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Bernard Tomic who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Bernard Tomic is the pick to win this match.
Bernard Tomic -> 1.33
Quinn Vandecasteele -> 3.14
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Bernard Tomic vs. Quinn Vandecasteele
There is no head to head record between Bernard Tomic and Quinn Vandecasteele since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Bernard Tomic
32 - 15win/loss
233
17
LLWWLWWLWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 41-23 | 29-17 | 12-5 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-27 | 35-19 | 4-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-12 | 24-7 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 9-12 | 4-4 | 2-4 | 2-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 3-6 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 245, the Australian reached the 2nd round after defeating Nicolas Mejia 6-71 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round against Mejia, Bernard recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-71 6-3 6-4). During the match, Tomic scored 106 points vs Mejia’s 103. Tomic was pretty aggressive to blast 50 winners.
Regarding the service games, Tomic struck 16 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Bernard Tomic lost the serve 3 times and he saved 8 break points. Furthermore, Tomic put 57% of his first serves in, winning 75% (50/67) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (20/50) on the 2nd serve. Tomic broke Mejia 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Tomic has winning win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 56% of his matches (238-187). 23-12 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Tomic has an overall 159-97 record in the last years on hard.
Tomic’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 Chennai,M25 Xalapa and M25 Tulsa.
The Australian has a composed 31-15 win-loss record in 2024, 23-12 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bloomfield Hills Challenger
Bernard has never competed in this tournament before.
Quinn Vandecasteele
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-15 | 12-12 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-13 | 28-11 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 10-8 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 588, Quinn reached the 2nd round after beating Jonah Braswell 6-4 4-6 7-5, Lorenzo Claverie 6-3 3-3 ret. and Tristan Schoolkate 4-6 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round against Schoolkate, Vandecasteele recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (4-6 6-3 6-4). During the match Vandecasteele scored 107 points vs Schoolkate’s 100. Vandecasteele was pretty aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Talking about serving, Vandecasteele fired 7 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Quinn Vandecasteele was quite efficient on serve to win 71% (42/59) of his 1st serve and 54% (31/57) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Quinn broke Schoolkate 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Vandecasteele has a composed 10-6 win-loss record in 2024, 8-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Tomic | Vandecasteele |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 32 | 76 |
| Pts | 106-103 | 269-250 |
| Total Points | 209 | 519 |
| Winners | 50 | 103 |
| %Winners | 47% | 38% |
Tomic played 1 match while Vandecasteele competed in 3 matches. Vandecasteele started his run from the qualifications while Tomic had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Bernard Tomic surrendered 1 set, while Quinn Vandecasteele conceded 2 sets. Tomic has played 6 set(s) less than Vandecasteele (3 vs 9). Therefore, Tomic played 44 games less than Vandecasteele. Tomic scored 50 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, Vandecasteele scored 103 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Tomic | Vandecasteele |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 16 | 28 |
| Avg per match | 16 | 9.3 |
| 1st in | 67/117 | 135/264 |
| %1st in | 57% | 51% |
| 1st pts | 50/67 | 103/135 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 76% |
| 2nd pts | 20/50 | 68/129 |
| %2nd pts | 40% | 53% |
Tomic bagged 16 aces . Vandecasteele managed to score 28 aces (9.3 per match). Tomic won 75% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 40% of the points. On the other side, Vandecasteele won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Tomic | Vandecasteele |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 8 |
| Converted | 5/6 | 8/28 |
| % Converted | 83% | 29% |
| Conceded | 11 | 25 |
| Saved | 8 | 20 |
| % Saved | 73% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 5 |
Tomic broke his opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. Tomic dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded. Quinn broke his opponents 8 times with a 29% conversion rate. Quinn conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
| Tomic | |||
| R1 Mejia |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-71 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 106-103 | 106-103 | |
| Total points | 209 | 209 | |
| Winners | 50 | 50 | |
| %Winners | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 16 | 16 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 67/117 | 67/117 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 50/67 | 50/67 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/50 | 20/50 | |
| % 2nd pts | 40% | 40% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
| Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
| Saved | 8/11 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 73% | 73% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Vandecasteele | |||||
| Q1 Braswell |
Q3 Claverie |
R1 Schoolkate |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 4-6 7-5 | 6-3 3-3 ret. | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 15 | 29 | 76 | |
| pts | 109-103 | 53-47 | 107-100 | 269-250 | |
| Total points | 212 | 100 | 207 | 519 | |
| Winners | 43 | 18 | 42 | 103 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 34% | 39% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 17 | 4 | 7 | 28 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 1 | 4 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 52/101 | 24/47 | 59/116 | 135/264 | |
| % 1st in | 51% | 51% | 51% | 51% | |
| 1st pts | 43/52 | 18/24 | 42/59 | 103/135 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 75% | 71% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/49 | 17/23 | 31/57 | 68/129 | |
| % 2nd pts | 41% | 74% | 54% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 1/10 | 3/7 | 8/28 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 10% | 43% | 29% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 2 | 15 | 25 | |
| Saved | 5/8 | 2/2 | 13/15 | 20 | |
| Saved % | 63% | 100% | 87% | 250% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWWLWWLWW
LLLWWWLLLL Tennis Scores in Bloomfield Hills Challenger
- Philip SekulicSekulic – Ethan QuinnQuinn (3-6 7-5 7-64) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jeff WolfWolf – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Learner TienTien – Bu YunchaoketeYunchaokete (0-6 7-5 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Tung-Lin WuWu (5-7 6-3 4-0 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Gijs BrouwerBrouwer (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo – Ryan SeggermanSeggerman (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine BellierBellier – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – Stefan KozlovKozlov (4-4) – H2H and prediction
