Carlos Gimeno Valero and Neil Oberleitner will face off in the qualifications of the Troyes Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 3:30 pm on COURT 3. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Neil Oberleitner who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Neil Oberleitner is the pick to win this match.
Neil Oberleitner -> 1.85
Carlos Gimeno Valero -> 1.89
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Carlos Gimeno Valero vs. Neil Oberleitner
There is no head to head record between Carlos Gimeno Valero and Neil Oberleitner since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Carlos Gimeno Valero
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 23-8 | 0-0 | 23-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 25-16 | 0-0 | 25-16 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 18-15 | 0-0 | 18-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 24-16 | 3-2 | 20-13 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 14-5 | 5-1 | 9-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 491, Gimeno Valero reached the qualifications after defeating Paulo Andre Saraiva Dos Santos 3-6 6-4 7-5.
In the qualifications against Andre Saraiva Dos, Gimeno Valero recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-4 7-5). During the match, Gimeno Valero scored 103 points vs Andre Saraiva Dos’s 100. Carlos was extremely aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Regarding the service games, Gimeno Valero recorded 2 aces and he was not very steady on his 2nd serve to score 11 double faults. Carlos Gimeno Valero lost the serve 3 times and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Gimeno Valero put 56% of his first serves in, winning 64% (38/59) of the points behind his 1st serve and 57% (26/46) on the 2nd serve. Gimeno Valero broke Andre Saraiva Dos 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Gimeno Valero has a solid match record in the last 6 years having won 66% of his matches (121-63). 23-7 on clay in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Gimeno Valero has an aggregate112-58 record in the last 6 years on clay.
Gimeno Valero’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Antalya and M25 Antalya.
Gimeno Valero has a compiled 23-7 win-loss record in 2024, 23-7 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Troyes Challenger
Neil Oberleitner
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 49-30 | 2-3 | 33-17 | 12-8 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
2023 | 37-30 | 10-8 | 15-15 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 8-2 |
2022 | 30-31 | 14-15 | 16-16 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 30-25 | 17-12 | 10-11 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 8-14 | 6-11 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 576, Oberleitner reached the qualifications after beating Paul Valsecchi 6-2 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Austrian had a good straight sets win against Valsecchi (6-2 6-1). During the match Oberleitner scored 58 points vs Valsecchi’s 32. The Austrian was pretty aggressive to blast 23 winners.
About the serving games, Oberleitner scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 5 double faults. Neil Oberleitner lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Oberleitner put 50% of his first serves in, winning 88% (23/26) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (12/26) on the 2nd serve. Oberleitner broke Valsecchi 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
The Austrian’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M15 Dubrovnik.
The Austrian has a composed 25-16 win-loss record in 2024, 18-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Gimeno Valero | Oberleitner |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
Tot Games | 31 | 15 |
Pts | 103-100 | 58-32 |
Total Points | 203 | 90 |
Winners | 38 | 23 |
%Winners | 37% | 40% |
Both Gimeno Valero and Oberleitner played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Carlos Gimeno Valero dropped 1 set while Neil Oberleitner hasn’t dropped a set so far. Gimeno Valero has played 1 set more than Oberleitner (3 vs 2). Therefore, Gimeno Valero played 16 games more than Oberleitner. Carlos scored 38 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, The Austrian recorded 23 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Gimeno Valero | Oberleitner |
---|---|---|
Aces | 2 | 1 |
Avg per match | 2 | 1 |
1st in | 59/105 | 26/52 |
%1st in | 56% | 50% |
1st pts | 38/59 | 23/26 |
%1st pts | 64% | 88% |
2nd pts | 26/46 | 12/26 |
%2nd pts | 57% | 46% |
Gimeno Valero managed to score 2 aces . Oberleitner recorded 1 ace . Gimeno Valero won 64% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Oberleitner won 88% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 46% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Gimeno Valero | Oberleitner |
---|---|---|
Won | 4 | 5 |
Converted | 4/8 | 5/9 |
% Converted | 50% | 56% |
Conceded | 12 | 5 |
Saved | 9 | 4 |
% Saved | 75% | 80% |
Times Broken | 3 | 1 |
Carlos broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Carlos lost his serve 3 times and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. Oberleitner broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Neil conceded his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
Gimeno Valero | |||
Q1 Andre Saraiva Dos |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 3-6 6-4 7-5 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
pts | 103-100 | 103-100 | |
Total points | 203 | 203 | |
Winners | 38 | 38 | |
%Winners | 37% | 37% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 2 | 2 | |
Double Faults | 11 | 11 | |
1st in | 59/105 | 59/105 | |
% 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
1st pts | 38/59 | 38/59 | |
% 1st pts | 64% | 64% | |
2nd pts | 26/46 | 26/46 | |
% 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
Saved | 9/12 | 9 | |
Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Oberleitner | |||
Q1 Valsecchi |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
pts | 58-32 | 58-32 | |
Total points | 90 | 90 | |
Winners | 23 | 23 | |
%Winners | 40% | 40% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 1 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
1st in | 26/52 | 26/52 | |
% 1st in | 50% | 50% | |
1st pts | 23/26 | 23/26 | |
% 1st pts | 88% | 88% | |
2nd pts | 12/26 | 12/26 | |
% 2nd pts | 46% | 46% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Khumoun SultanovSultanov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – Vadym UrsuUrsu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael GeertsGeerts – David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Constantin Bittoun KouzmineBittoun Kouzmine – Nikola MilojevicMilojevic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Damien WengerWenger – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hazem NaowNaow – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona – Alvaro Guillen MezaGuillen Meza (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jakub PaulPaul – Luca CastelnuovoCastelnuovo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos Gimeno ValeroGimeno Valero – Neil OberleitnerOberleitner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thomas Deschamps (FRA)Deschamps (FRA) – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Franco RoncadelliRoncadelli – Maxence BeaugeBeauge (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lilian MarmousezMarmousez – Sandro KoppKopp (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Tristan LamasineLamasine (0-0) – H2H and prediction