Yuliia Starodubtseva and Maddison Inglis will square off in the qualifications of Wimbledon for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 12:30 pm on COURT 13. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Yuliia Starodubtseva who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Yuliia Starodubtseva is the pick to win this match.
Yuliia Starodubtseva -> 1.87
Maddison Inglis -> 1.89
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Yuliia Starodubtseva vs. Maddison Inglis
This will be the 2nd time that Yuliia Starodubtseva and Maddison Inglis play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Starodubtseva (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on grass.
The last time that they fought against each other, Starodubtseva won 6-3 2-6 6-4 in the qualifications in Brisbane back in 2023.
Yuliia Starodubtseva
20 - 14win/loss
101
79
LLLLWLWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 40-26 | 26-15 | 9-9 | 0-0 | 5-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-17 | 20-5 | 19-10 | 7-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 153, Starodubtseva got to the qualifications after beating Anna Bondar 6-4 6-0 and Anastasia Tikhonova 6-1 6-2.
In the qualifications, Yuliia had a good straight sets win against Tikhonova (6-1 6-2). During the match, Starodubtseva scored 60 points vs Tikhonova’s 38. Starodubtseva was exceptionally aggressive to blast 18 winners.
Talking about the service games, Starodubtseva scored just 1 ace during the encounter and she committed only 1 double fault. Yuliia Starodubtseva lost the serve once and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Starodubtseva put 58% of her first serves in, winning 69% (18/26) of the points behind her 1st serve and 58% (11/19) on the 2nd serve. Yuliia broke Tikhonova 6 times after converting 75% of her break points (6/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Ukrainian started her run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, she hasn’t dropped yet a set in this tournament to win 60% of the points she played.
Starodubtseva has a solid win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 64% of her matches (92-52). 3-1 on grass in 2024. Regarding her performance on the same surface of this event, Starodubtseva has a compiled3-1 record in the last 6 years on grass.
Starodubtseva’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in the W100 Oeiras.
Yuliia has a composed 19-14 win-loss record in 2024, 3-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Wimbledon
The Ukrainian has never competed in this tournament before.
Maddison Inglis
22 - 13win/loss
154
112
LWWLWLWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 46-24 | 36-18 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 9-4 | 1-2 |
| 2023 | 35-24 | 23-16 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 8-5 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-24 | 18-16 | 0-5 | 0-0 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 16-23 | 11-13 | 4-5 | 0-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-6 | 11-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 243, Maddison reached the qualifications after defeating Sara Bejlek 6-4 1-0 ret. and Natalija Stevanovic 6-3 6-0.
In the qualifications, Inglis had a good straight sets win against Kostic (6-3 6-0). During the match Inglis scored 61 points vs Kostic’s 36. The Australian was extremely aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about serving, Inglis made 4 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Maddison Inglis was pretty effective on serve to win 79% (23/29) of her 1st serve and 83% (10/12) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Australian broke Kostic 4 times after converting 44% of her break points (4/9).
Her best result of the season was winning the title the W35 Mildura where she overcame Tina Nadine Smith in the final 6-4 6-1 and the W100 Tokyo where she beat Ena Shibahara in the final 6-4 3-6 6-2.
Maddison has a compiled 22-12 win-loss record in 2024, 9-3 on grass (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Starodubtseva | Inglis |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 26 |
| Pts | 126-83 | 101-67 |
| Total Points | 209 | 168 |
| Winners | 40 | 40 |
| %Winners | 32% | 40% |
Both Starodubtseva and Inglis played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Starodubtseva has played 1 set(s) less than Inglis (4 vs 5). However, it’s interesting to notice that Starodubtseva played 5 games more than Inglis. Yuliia scored 40 winners (32% of the total points). On the other side, Maddison made 40 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Starodubtseva | Inglis |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 3 |
| 1st in | 57/91 | 51/75 |
| %1st in | 63% | 68% |
| 1st pts | 40/57 | 40/51 |
| %1st pts | 70% | 78% |
| 2nd pts | 21/34 | 15/24 |
| %2nd pts | 62% | 63% |
Starodubtseva recorded 2 aces (1 per match). Inglis recorded 6 aces (3 per match). Starodubtseva won 70% points on her first serve. She extremely effective on her second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Inglis won 78% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Starodubtseva | Inglis |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 11 | 7 |
| Converted | 11/20 | 7/13 |
| % Converted | 55% | 54% |
| Conceded | 5 | 3 |
| Saved | 3 | 2 |
| % Saved | 60% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Yuliia broke her opponents 11 times with a 55% conversion rate. The Ukrainian lost her serve twice and she saved 60% of the break points that she conceded. Inglis broke her opponents 7 times with a 54% conversion rate. Inglis conceded her serve once and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded.
| Starodubtseva | ||||
| Q1 Bondar |
Q2 Tikhonova |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-0 | 6-1 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 15 | 31 | |
| pts | 66-45 | 60-38 | 126-83 | |
| Total points | 111 | 98 | 209 | |
| Winners | 22 | 18 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 30% | 32% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 31/46 | 26/45 | 57/91 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 58% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 22/31 | 18/26 | 40/57 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 69% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/15 | 11/19 | 21/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 67% | 58% | 62% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 6 | 11 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 6/8 | 11/20 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 75% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 2/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 67% | 59% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Inglis | ||||
| Q1 Bejlek |
Q2 Kostic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 1-0 ret. | 6-3 6-0 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 11 | 15 | 26 | |
| pts | 40-31 | 61-36 | 101-67 | |
| Total points | 71 | 97 | 168 | |
| Winners | 17 | 23 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 43% | 38% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 22/34 | 29/41 | 51/75 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 71% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 17/22 | 23/29 | 40/51 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 79% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 5/12 | 10/12 | 15/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 42% | 83% | 63% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 4/9 | 7/13 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 44% | 54% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1/1 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 100% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWLWWWW
LWWLWLWWWW Tennis Scores – Wimbledon
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Guido Ivan JustoIvan Justo (6-4 1-6 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Samm ButlerButler – Michael VrbenskyVrbensky (7-5 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Samuel PuskarPuskar – Roman BoychukBoychuk (2-6 6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tomas JirousekJirousek – Isa MammetgulyyevMammetgulyyev (4-6 6-1 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Matvey KhomentovskiyKhomentovskiy – Marek GengelGengel (6-3 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tomas MachacMachac – Tadeas ParoulekParoulek (6-4 2-6 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Renata ZarazuaZarazua – Mccartney KesslerKessler (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova – Eva LysLys (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Olivia GadeckiGadecki – Elsa JacquemotJacquemot (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nuria Parrizas-DiazParrizas-Diaz – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Olga DanilovicDanilovic – Dalma GalfiGalfi (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yulia StarodubtsewaStarodubtsewa – Maddison InglisInglis (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gergana TopalovaTopalova – Panna UdvardyUdvardy (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alycia ParksParks – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zeynep SonmezSonmez – Daria SnigurSnigur (0-4) – H2H and prediction
- Lea BoskovicBoskovic – Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse (0-0) – H2H and prediction
