Jelena Ostapenko and Katie Boulter will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Rothesay International for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 12:30 pm on CENTRE COURT . In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jelena Ostapenko who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jelena Ostapenko is the pick to win this match.
Jelena Ostapenko -> 1.9
Katie Boulter -> 1.909
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jelena Ostapenko vs. Katie Boulter
There is no head to head record between Jelena Ostapenko and Katie Boulter since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Jelena Ostapenko
26 - 12win/loss
15
5
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 31-19 | 14-10 | 8-6 | 4-0 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 37-22 | 21-15 | 7-4 | 1-1 | 8-2 | 0-0 |
2022 | 33-19 | 19-10 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 32-19 | 12-9 | 5-4 | 7-4 | 8-2 | 0-0 |
2020 | 9-8 | 3-2 | 4-3 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 13, Ostapenko reached the 2nd round after defeating Greetje Minnen 7-63 6-1.
In the 1st round, The Latvian had a good straight sets win against Minnen (7-63 6-1). During the match, Ostapenko scored 71 points vs Minnen’s 51. Ostapenko was very aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about the service games, Ostapenko scored just 1 ace during the encounter and she committed only 3 double faults. Jelena Ostapenko lost the serve 4 times and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Ostapenko put 63% of her first serves in, winning 65% (22/34) of the points behind her 1st serve and 50% (10/20) on the 2nd serve. Ostapenko broke Minnen 7 times after converting 78% of her break points (7/9).
Ostapenko has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 60% of her matches (308-202). 1-1 on grass in 2024. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this competition, Ostapenko has an aggregate 49-22 record in the last years on grass.
Her best result of the season was winning the title in Adelaide where she beat Daria Kasatkina in the final 6-3 6-2 and in Linz where she defeated Ekaterina Alexandrova in the final 6-2 6-3.
The Latvian has an aggregate 26-12 win-loss record in 2024, 1-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Eastbourne
Katie Boulter
22 - 11win/loss
23
23
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 36-22 | 24-12 | 3-6 | 1-1 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
2023 | 40-20 | 22-12 | 1-1 | 3-3 | 10-4 | 4-0 |
2022 | 29-18 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 16-7 | 9-4 | 0-0 |
2021 | 28-15 | 12-9 | 5-1 | 7-3 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
2020 | 14-8 | 10-6 | 1-1 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 32, the Brit reached the 2nd round after beating Petra Martic 6-1 7-68.
In the 1st round, Boulter had a good straight sets win against Martic (6-1 7-68). During the match Boulter scored 72 points vs Martic’s 57. Katie was exceptionally aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about serving, Boulter struck 5 aces and she committed only 6 double faults. Katie Boulter lost the serve twice and she saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Boulter put 66% of her first serves in, winning 68% (32/47) of the points behind her 1st serve and 50% (12/24) on the 2nd serve. Boulter was clinical in her return game without wasting any break point and break Martic 4 times.
Her best result of the year was conquering the title in San Diego where she defeated Marta Kostyuk in the final 5-7 6-2 6-2 and in Nottingham where she beat Karolina Pliskova in the final 4-6 6-3 6-2.
Boulter has an aggregate 22-11 win-loss record in 2024, 6-1 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Eastbourne
Previously, her best result was reaching the 3rd round in 2022. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Ostapenko | Boulter |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 |
Pts | 71-51 | 72-57 |
Total Points | 122 | 129 |
Winners | 22 | 32 |
%Winners | 31% | 44% |
Both Ostapenko and Boulter played 1 match. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Ostapenko and Boulter have played the same amount of sets 2. They also played the same amount of games (20). Ostapenko scored 22 winners (31% of the total points). On the other side, Katie managed to score 32 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Ostapenko | Boulter |
---|---|---|
Aces | 1 | 5 |
Avg per match | 1 | 5 |
1st in | 34/54 | 47/71 |
%1st in | 63% | 66% |
1st pts | 22/34 | 32/47 |
%1st pts | 65% | 68% |
2nd pts | 10/20 | 12/24 |
%2nd pts | 50% | 50% |
Ostapenko struck 1 ace . Boulter also managed to score 5 aces . Ostapenko won 65% points on her first serve. She pretty effective on her second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Boulter won 68% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Ostapenko | Boulter |
---|---|---|
Won | 7 | 4 |
Converted | 7/9 | 4/4 |
% Converted | 78% | 100% |
Conceded | 6 | 6 |
Saved | 2 | 4 |
% Saved | 33% | 67% |
Times Broken | 4 | 2 |
Jelena broke her opponent 7 times with a 78% conversion rate. Ostapenko conceded her serve 4 times and she saved 33% of the break points that she conceded. Boulter broke her opponent 4 times with a 100% conversion rate. The Brit conceded her serve twice and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded.
Ostapenko | |||
R1 Minnen |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-63 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
pts | 71-51 | 71-51 | |
Total points | 122 | 122 | |
Winners | 22 | 22 | |
%Winners | 31% | 31% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 1 | 1 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
1st in | 34/54 | 34/54 | |
% 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
1st pts | 22/34 | 22/34 | |
% 1st pts | 65% | 65% | |
2nd pts | 10/20 | 10/20 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 7 | 7 | |
Converted | 7/9 | 7/9 | |
Converted % | 78% | 78% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 2/6 | 2 | |
Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Boulter | |||
R1 Martic |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-1 7-68 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
pts | 72-57 | 72-57 | |
Total points | 129 | 129 | |
Winners | 32 | 32 | |
%Winners | 44% | 44% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
1st in | 47/71 | 47/71 | |
% 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
1st pts | 32/47 | 32/47 | |
% 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
2nd pts | 12/24 | 12/24 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 4 | 4 | |
Converted | 4/4 | 4/4 | |
Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
Saved | 4/6 | 4 | |
Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Eastbourne
- Elmar EjupovicEjupovic – Nick HardtHardt (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gijs BrouwerBrouwer – Yannik ReuterReuter (7-5 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Juan Pablo VarillasPablo Varillas – Boris FassbenderFassbender (4-6 6-4 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Zizou BergsBergs – Jonathan KanarKanar (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jelle SelsSels – Raphael BaltenspergerBaltensperger (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Agustin VelottiVelotti – Constant De La BassetiereDe La Bassetiere (6-2 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Sofia KeninKenin – Harriet DartDart (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Madison KeysKeys – Anhelina KalininaKalinina (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Karolina MuchovaMuchova – Magda LinetteLinette (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jelena OstapenkoOstapenko – Katie BoulterBoulter (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elise MertensMertens – Jasmine PaoliniPaolini (4-1) – H2H and prediction
- Darya KasatkinaKasatkina – Yue YuanYuan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Emma RaducanuRaducanu – Jessica PegulaPegula (0-1) – H2H and prediction