Ricardas Berankis and Federico Iannaccone will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Blois Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 1:00 pm on COURT 2. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ricardas Berankis who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ricardas Berankis is the pick to win this match.
Ricardas Berankis -> 1.68
Federico Iannaccone -> 2.1
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Ricardas Berankis vs. Federico Iannaccone
There is no head to head record between Ricardas Berankis and Federico Iannaccone since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Ricardas Berankis
25 - 15win/loss
326
50
LLLLLWWWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-24 | 18-14 | 5-1 | 10-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 28-22 | 7-9 | 2-3 | 16-8 | 3-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-17 | 12-9 | 1-4 | 7-3 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-23 | 9-8 | 5-7 | 6-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 10-8 | 9-7 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 336, Berankis got to the 2nd round after defeating Hazem Naow 6-4 7-64.
In the 1st round, Richard had a good straight sets win against Naow (6-4 7-64). During the match, Berankis scored 71 points vs Naow’s 64. Richard was very aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about the service games, Berankis bagged 10 aces and he committed only 5 double faults. Ricardas Berankis lost the serve once. Furthermore, Berankis put 58% of his first serves in, winning 87% (33/38) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (14/28) on the 2nd serve. The Lithuanian was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Naow twice.
Berankis has good match record in the last 10 years having won 57% of his matches (271-208). 1-1 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Berankis has a composed 25-34 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
The Lithuanian’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in the Gwangju Challenger.
The Lithuanian has a composed 23-15 win-loss record in 2024, 1-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Blois Challenger
Richard has never competed in this tournament before.
Federico Iannaccone
23 - 18win/loss
531
466
LLWLLWWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 34-27 | 11-7 | 22-18 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 45-30 | 13-6 | 32-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 29-24 | 11-10 | 15-11 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 19-15 | 0-1 | 16-10 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2020 | 4-4 | 1-2 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 486, Iannaccone reached the 2nd round after defeating Antoine Ghibaudo 7-66 2-6 6-3, Siddhant Banthia 6-3 3-6 7-5 and Elmer Moller 6-75 7-62 7-5.
In the 1st round against Moller, Federico recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-75 7-62 7-5). During the match Iannaccone scored 128 points vs Moller’s 120. Iannaccone was exceptionally aggressive to blast 57 winners.
Talking about serving, Iannaccone recorded 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Federico Iannaccone lost the serve 5 times and he saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Iannaccone put 71% of his first serves in, winning 62% (57/92) of the points behind his 1st serve and 61% (23/38) on the 2nd serve. Iannaccone broke Moller 6 times after converting 35% of his break points (6/17).
Federico’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M15 Monastir and M25 Santa Margherita di Pula.
Federico has a compiled 23-17 win-loss record in 2024, 11-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Berankis | Iannaccone |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 9 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 98 |
| Pts | 71-64 | 326-313 |
| Total Points | 135 | 639 |
| Winners | 33 | 142 |
| %Winners | 46% | 44% |
Berankis played 1 match while Iannaccone competed in 3 matches. Iannaccone started his run from the qualifications while Berankis had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Federico Iannaccone lost 3 sets while Ricardas Berankis hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Berankis has played 7 set(s) less than Iannaccone (2 vs 9). Therefore, Berankis played 75 games less than Iannaccone. The Lithuanian scored 33 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, Iannaccone made 142 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Berankis | Iannaccone |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 10 | 4.3 |
| 1st in | 38/66 | 236/333 |
| %1st in | 58% | 71% |
| 1st pts | 33/38 | 142/236 |
| %1st pts | 87% | 60% |
| 2nd pts | 14/28 | 56/97 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 58% |
Berankis fired 10 aces . Iannaccone blasted 13 aces (4.3 per match). Berankis won 87% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Iannaccone won 60% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Berankis | Iannaccone |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 16 |
| Converted | 2/2 | 16/38 |
| % Converted | 100% | 42% |
| Conceded | 1 | 36 |
| Saved | 0 | 21 |
| % Saved | 0% | 58% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 15 |
Richard broke his opponent twice with a 100% conversion rate. The Lithuanian lost his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded. Iannaccone broke his opponents 16 times with a 42% conversion rate. Federico conceded his serve 15 times and he saved 58% of the break points that he conceded.
| Berankis | |||
| R1 Naow |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-64 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 71-64 | 71-64 | |
| Total points | 135 | 135 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 38/66 | 38/66 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 33/38 | 33/38 | |
| % 1st pts | 87% | 87% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/28 | 14/28 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/2 | 2/2 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Iannaccone | |||||
| Q1 Ghibaudo |
Q3 Banthia |
R1 Moller |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-66 2-6 6-3 | 6-3 3-6 7-5 | 6-75 7-62 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | 38 | 98 | |
| pts | 104-102 | 94-91 | 128-120 | 326-313 | |
| Total points | 206 | 185 | 248 | 639 | |
| Winners | 50 | 35 | 57 | 142 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 37% | 45% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 3 | 6 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 5 | 2 | 8 | |
| 1st in | 83/110 | 61/93 | 92/130 | 236/333 | |
| % 1st in | 75% | 66% | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 50/83 | 35/61 | 57/92 | 142/236 | |
| % 1st pts | 60% | 57% | 62% | 60% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/27 | 19/32 | 23/38 | 56/97 | |
| % 2nd pts | 52% | 59% | 61% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 6 | 6 | 16 | |
| Converted | 4/12 | 6/9 | 6/17 | 16/38 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 67% | 35% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 13 | 11 | 36 | |
| Saved | 7/12 | 8/13 | 6/11 | 21 | |
| Saved % | 58% | 62% | 55% | 175% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | 5 | 15 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLLWWWWL
LLWLLWWWWW Tennis Scores in Blois Challenger
- Edas ButvilasButvilas – Nicolas Alvarez VaronaAlvarez Varona (6-79 7-69 2-0 ret.) – See score progression
- Remy BertolaBertola – Carlos Sanchez JoverSanchez Jover (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Gabriel Debru/Paul InchauspeDebru/Paul Inchauspe – Blake Bayldon/Mats HermansBayldon/Mats Hermans (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Federico IannacconeIannaccone – Elmer MollerMoller (6-75 7-62 7-5) – See score progression
- Benjamin Lock/Courtney John LockLock/Courtney John Lock – Anthony Genov/Bruno Pujol NavarroGenov/Bruno Pujol Navarro (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur GeaGea – Thomas FaurelFaurel (6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Martin LandaluceLandaluce – Clement TaburTabur (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Jacopo BerrettiniBerrettini (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Jules MarieMarie – Benjamin LockLock (6-3 4-6 7-5) – See score progression
- Moez EcharguiEchargui – Vadym UrsuUrsu (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Jiri Barnat/Filip DudaBarnat/Filip Duda – Moez Echargui/Federico IannacconeEchargui/Federico Iannaccone (4-6 6-3 10-7) – See score progression
- Siddhant Banthia/Divij SharanBanthia/Divij Sharan – James Davis/James MackinlayDavis/James Mackinlay (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Florent BaxBax – Tristan LamasineLamasine (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Michael GeertsGeerts – Vilius GaubasGaubas (7-62 6-3) – See score progression
- Alibek KachmazovKachmazov – Mathias BourgueBourgue (6-3 7-66) – See score progression
- Gabriel DebruDebru – Darwin BlanchBlanch (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Ricardas BerankisBerankis – Hazem NaowNaow (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Ergi KirkinKirkin – Carlos TabernerTaberner (6-74 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Corentin DenollyDenolly – Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Lucas BouquetBouquet – Martin KrumichKrumich (7-69 4-6 7-66) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Moez EcharguiEchargui (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas BouquetBouquet – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Corentin DenollyDenolly – Michael GeertsGeerts (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Remy BertolaBertola – Jules MarieMarie (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ergi KirkinKirkin – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Federico IannacconeIannaccone – Richard BerankisBerankis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Florent BaxBax – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
