Jerome Kym and Kamil Majchrzak will face off in the semifinal of the Bratislava 1 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 3:30 pm on CENTRAL COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kamil Majchrzak who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Kamil Majchrzak is the pick to win this match.
Kamil Majchrzak -> 1.55
Jerome Kym -> 2.31
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jerome Kym vs. Kamil Majchrzak
There is no head to head record between Jerome Kym and Kamil Majchrzak since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Jerome Kym
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 59-20 | 14-4 | 37-11 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 23-9 | 0-0 | 18-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 5-0 |
2022 | 41-22 | 17-5 | 12-9 | 9-5 | 0-0 | 3-3 |
2021 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
2020 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 281 (career-high), Kym got to the semifinal after defeating Nino Serdarusic 3-6 6-0 6-3, Toby Alex Kodat 6-1 6-0, Valentin Royer 6-75 7-62 6-4, Marco Trungelliti 1-6 7-64 7-64 and Pedro Cachin 6-75 6-1 6-2.
In the quarter against Cachin, The Swiss recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-75 6-1 6-2). During the match, Kym scored 93 points vs Cachin’s 69. Jerome was extremely aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Talking about the service games, Kym fired 18 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Jerome Kym was quite effective on serve to win 81% (43/53) of his 1st serve and 57% (16/28) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Jerome broke Cachin 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Swiss started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has lost 4 set in this tournament to conquer 54% of the points he played.
Kym has a solid win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 69% of his matches (107-49). 27-5 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Kym has a compiled61-28 record in the last 6 years on clay.
His best result of the current season was winning the title the Prostejov Challenger where he overcame Chun Hsin Tseng in the final 6-2 3-6 6-2.
The Swiss has a compiled 35-8 win-loss record in 2024, 27-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bratislava 1 Challenger
Kamil Majchrzak
44 - 9win/loss
120
75
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 63-19 | 26-6 | 34-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 28-22 | 19-10 | 4-6 | 4-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 34-21 | 4-4 | 16-9 | 5-5 | 9-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 12-10 | 1-3 | 5-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 295, the Pole reached the semifinal after beating Peter Benjamin Privara 6-3 6-2, Mikalai Haliak 6-1 3-1 ret., Ergi Kirkin 6-3 6-1, Luka Mikrut 6-0 6-4 and Dmitry Popko 6-1 6-3.
In the quarter, The Pole had a good straight sets win against Popko (6-1 6-3). During the match Majchrzak scored 53 points vs Popko’s 30. The Pole was quite aggressive to blast 23 winners.
Talking about serving, Majchrzak made 3 aces and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Kamil Majchrzak was extremely efficient on serve to win 92% (23/25) of his 1st serve and 75% (9/12) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Pole broke Popko 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Pole started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t lost yet a set in this event to conquer 61% of the points he played.
His best result of the year was winning the title the Kigali 1 Challenger where he defeated Marco Trungelliti in the final 6-4 6-4.
Kamil has an overall 43-9 win-loss record in 2024, 25-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Bratislava 1 Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the quarter in 2017. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Kym | Majchrzak |
---|---|---|
Match played | 5 | 5 |
Tot Set | 14 | 11 |
Tot Games | 134 | 76 |
Pts | 474-399 | 277-171 |
Total Points | 873 | 448 |
Winners | 215 | 119 |
%Winners | 45% | 43% |
Both Kym and Majchrzak played 5 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Jerome Kym lost 4 sets while Kamil Majchrzak hasn’t lost a set so far. Kym has played 3 sets more than Majchrzak (14 vs 11). Therefore, Kym played 58 games more than Majchrzak. The Swiss scored 215 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, The Pole recorded 119 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Kym | Majchrzak |
---|---|---|
Aces | 44 | 17 |
Avg per match | 8.8 | 3.4 |
1st in | 282/426 | 145/217 |
%1st in | 66% | 67% |
1st pts | 215/282 | 119/145 |
%1st pts | 76% | 82% |
2nd pts | 67/144 | 47/72 |
%2nd pts | 47% | 65% |
Kym bagged 44 aces (8.8 per match). Majchrzak bagged 17 aces (3.4 per match). Kym won 76% points on his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 47% of the points. On the other side, Majchrzak won 82% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Kym | Majchrzak |
---|---|---|
Won | 23 | 18 |
Converted | 23/52 | 18/31 |
% Converted | 44% | 58% |
Conceded | 27 | 6 |
Saved | 16 | 6 |
% Saved | 59% | 100% |
Times Broken | 11 | 0 |
The Swiss broke his opponents 23 times with a 44% conversion rate. Kym lost his serve 11 times and he saved 59% of the break points that he conceded. Kamil broke his opponents 18 times with a 58% conversion rate. Majchrzak was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 6 break points.
Kym | |||||||
Q1 Serdarusic |
Q3 Alex |
R1 Royer |
R2 Trungelliti |
1/4 Cachin |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 3-6 6-0 6-3 | 6-1 6-0 | 6-75 7-62 6-4 | 1-6 7-64 7-64 | 6-75 6-1 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 14 | |
Tot Games | 24 | 13 | 36 | 33 | 28 | 134 | |
pts | 84-67 | 57-29 | 131-119 | 109-115 | 93-69 | 474-399 | |
Total points | 151 | 86 | 250 | 224 | 162 | 873 | |
Winners | 38 | 23 | 57 | 54 | 43 | 215 | |
%Winners | 45% | 40% | 44% | 50% | 46% | 45% | |
SERVE | |||||||
Aces | 5 | 3 | 11 | 7 | 18 | 44 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
1st in | 48/82 | 27/35 | 74/113 | 80/115 | 53/81 | 282/426 | |
% 1st in | 59% | 77% | 65% | 70% | 65% | 66% | |
1st pts | 38/48 | 23/27 | 57/74 | 54/80 | 43/53 | 215/282 | |
% 1st pts | 79% | 85% | 77% | 68% | 81% | 76% | |
2nd pts | 15/34 | 3/8 | 19/39 | 14/35 | 16/28 | 67/144 | |
% 2nd pts | 44% | 38% | 49% | 40% | 57% | 47% | |
Breaks | |||||||
Won | 5 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 23 | |
Converted | 5/9 | 6/11 | 3/11 | 4/13 | 5/8 | 23/52 | |
Converted % | 56% | 55% | 27% | 31% | 63% | 44% | |
Conceded | 6 | 0 | 6 | 11 | 4 | 27 | |
Saved | 4/6 | 0/0 | 4/6 | 5/11 | 3/4 | 16 | |
Saved % | 67% | – | 67% | 45% | 75% | 51% | |
Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 11 |
Majchrzak | |||||||
Q1 Benjamin |
Q3 Haliak |
R1 Kirkin |
R2 Mikrut |
1/4 Popko |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-2 | 6-1 3-1 ret. | 6-3 6-1 | 6-0 6-4 | 6-1 6-3 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | |
Tot Games | 17 | 11 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 76 | |
pts | 60-41 | 41-22 | 64-43 | 59-35 | 53-30 | 277-171 | |
Total points | 101 | 63 | 107 | 94 | 83 | 448 | |
Winners | 25 | 15 | 31 | 25 | 23 | 119 | |
%Winners | 42% | 37% | 48% | 42% | 43% | 43% | |
SERVE | |||||||
Aces | 5 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 17 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
1st in | 28/47 | 17/30 | 41/55 | 34/48 | 25/37 | 145/217 | |
% 1st in | 60% | 57% | 75% | 71% | 68% | 67% | |
1st pts | 25/28 | 15/17 | 31/41 | 25/34 | 23/25 | 119/145 | |
% 1st pts | 89% | 88% | 76% | 74% | 92% | 82% | |
2nd pts | 12/19 | 9/13 | 8/14 | 9/14 | 9/12 | 47/72 | |
% 2nd pts | 63% | 69% | 57% | 64% | 75% | 65% | |
Breaks | |||||||
Won | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 18 | |
Converted | 3/6 | 3/6 | 4/6 | 4/6 | 4/7 | 18/31 | |
Converted % | 50% | 50% | 67% | 67% | 57% | 58% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 6 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0/0 | 4/4 | 2/2 | 0/0 | 6 | |
Saved % | – | – | 100% | 100% | – | 40% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Bratislava 1 Challenger
- Henrique RochaRocha – Norbert GombosGombos (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Jerome KymKym – Pedro CachinCachin (6-75 6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Dmitry PopkoPopko (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – Martin LandaluceLandaluce (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Denys Molchanov/Philipp OswaldMolchanov/Philipp Oswald – Karol Drzewiecki/Piotr MatuszewskiDrzewiecki/Piotr Matuszewski (3-6 7-65 10-7) – See score progression
- Ji Sung Nam/Patrik Niklas-SalminenSung Nam/Patrik Niklas-Salminen – Ivan Sabanov/Matej SabanovSabanov/Matej Sabanov (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Jozef KovalikKovalik – (0-0) – H2H and prediction