Chak Lam Coleman Wong and James Kent Trotter will fight against each other in the semifinal of the Tyler Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 11:00 am on CENTER COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Chak Lam Coleman Wong who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Chak Lam Coleman Wong is the pick to win this match.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 1.6
James Kent Trotter -> 2.21
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. James Kent Trotter
This will be the 2nd time that Chak Lam Coleman Wong and James Kent Trotter face off. The head to head is 1-0 for Lam Coleman Wong (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they fought against each other, Lam Coleman Wong won 7-5 6-2 in the 1st round in the Shenzhen 1 Challenger back in April 2024.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
14 - 15win/loss
170
128
LWLWWLLWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 41-36 | 39-26 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 181, the got to the semifinal after defeating Cannon Kingsley 7-5 6-4, Stefan Kozlov 4-6 6-4 4-1 ret. and Ethan Quinn 6-2 6-2.
In the quarter, Chak had a good straight sets win against Quinn (6-2 6-2). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 59 points vs Quinn’s 44. Lam Coleman Wong was extremely aggressive to blast 24 winners.
Talking about the service games, Lam Coleman Wong scored 6 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Chak Lam Coleman Wong conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 56% of his first serves in, win 86% (24/28) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (10/22) on the 2nd serve. Lam Coleman Wong broke Quinn 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Lam Coleman Wong hasn’t surrendered yet a set in this event to win 56% of the points he played.
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 57% of his matches (105-78). 14-11 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Lam Coleman Wong has an aggregate84-57 win-loss record in the last 6 years on hard.
Chak’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in the New Delhi Challenger.
Chak has an overall 14-14 win-loss record in 2024, 14-11 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tyler Challenger
Chak has never competed in this tournament before.
James Kent Trotter
17 - 12win/loss
193
182
LWWWLWWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 41-23 | 19-12 | 1-3 | 21-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 19-13 | 15-10 | 0-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-11 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 371 (career-high), Kent Trotter got to the semifinal after defeating Trevor Svajda 6-4 7-65, Christian Langmo 6-3 6-4 and Abedallah Shelbayh 6-2 7-5.
In the quarter, The Japanese had a good straight sets win against Shelbayh (6-2 7-5). During the match Kent Trotter scored 69 points vs Shelbayh’s 54. James was exceptionally aggressive to blast 33 winners.
About the serving games, Kent Trotter made 10 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. James Kent Trotter lost the serve once and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Kent Trotter put 57% of his first serves in, winning 83% (33/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (14/30) on the 2nd serve. James broke Shelbayh 4 times after converting 80% of his break points (4/5).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Kent Trotter hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
The Japanese has a compiled 16-12 win-loss record in 2024, 9-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Kent Trotter |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 8 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 63 | 62 |
| Pts | 224-188 | 217-175 |
| Total Points | 412 | 392 |
| Winners | 86 | 96 |
| %Winners | 38% | 44% |
Both Lam Coleman Wong and Kent Trotter played 3 matches. At the moment, Chak Lam Coleman Wong lost 1 set while James Kent Trotter hasn’t dropped a set so far. Lam Coleman Wong has played 2 sets more than Kent Trotter (8 vs 6). Therefore, Lam Coleman Wong played 1 game more than Kent Trotter. Lam Coleman Wong scored 86 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The Japanese struck 96 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Kent Trotter |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 22 | 27 |
| Avg per match | 7.3 | 9 |
| 1st in | 110/192 | 115/191 |
| %1st in | 57% | 60% |
| 1st pts | 86/110 | 96/115 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 83% |
| 2nd pts | 41/82 | 38/76 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 50% |
Lam Coleman Wong scored 22 aces (7.3 per match). Kent Trotter made 27 aces (9 per match). Lam Coleman Wong won 78% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Kent Trotter won 83% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Kent Trotter |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 11 | 9 |
| Converted | 11/34 | 9/22 |
| % Converted | 32% | 41% |
| Conceded | 10 | 12 |
| Saved | 7 | 9 |
| % Saved | 70% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Chak broke his opponents 11 times with a 32% conversion rate. Lam Coleman Wong lost his serve 3 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded. Kent Trotter broke his opponents 9 times with a 41% conversion rate. James conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lam Coleman Wong | |||||
| R1 Kingsley |
R2 Kozlov |
1/4 Quinn |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-4 | 4-6 6-4 4-1 ret. | 6-2 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 25 | 16 | 63 | |
| pts | 76-62 | 89-82 | 59-44 | 224-188 | |
| Total points | 138 | 171 | 103 | 412 | |
| Winners | 27 | 35 | 24 | 86 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 39% | 41% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 9 | 7 | 6 | 22 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 33/61 | 49/81 | 28/50 | 110/192 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 60% | 56% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 27/33 | 35/49 | 24/28 | 86/110 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 71% | 86% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/28 | 15/32 | 10/22 | 41/82 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 47% | 45% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 4 | 4 | 11 | |
| Converted | 3/14 | 4/12 | 4/8 | 11/34 | |
| Converted % | 21% | 33% | 50% | 32% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | 0 | 10 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 3/5 | 0/0 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 60% | – | 47% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | |
| Kent Trotter | |||||
| R1 Svajda |
R2 Langmo |
1/4 Shelbayh |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-65 | 6-3 6-4 | 6-2 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 19 | 20 | 62 | |
| pts | 81-66 | 67-55 | 69-54 | 217-175 | |
| Total points | 147 | 122 | 123 | 392 | |
| Winners | 32 | 31 | 33 | 96 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 46% | 48% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 9 | 8 | 10 | 27 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 4 | 4 | 13 | |
| 1st in | 39/66 | 36/55 | 40/70 | 115/191 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 65% | 57% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 32/39 | 31/36 | 33/40 | 96/115 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 86% | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/27 | 11/19 | 14/30 | 38/76 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 58% | 47% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 2 | 4 | 9 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 2/9 | 4/5 | 9/22 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 22% | 80% | 41% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 1 | 8 | 12 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1/1 | 7/8 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 100% | 88% | 74% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWLLWLW
LWWWLWWWWW Tennis Scores in Tyler Challenger
- Liam DraxlDraxl – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Ethan QuinnQuinn (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Alexis GalarneauGalarneau (3-6 6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Colin Sinclair/Chak Lam Coleman WongSinclair/Chak Lam Coleman Wong – Nicolas Mejia/Andres UrreaMejia/Andres Urrea (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Brandon HoltHolt – Liam DraxlDraxl (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
