Tristan Schoolkate and Billy Harris will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Surbiton Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 12:00 pm on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Billy Harris who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Billy Harris is the pick to win this match.
Billy Harris -> 1.54
Tristan Schoolkate -> 2.375
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Tristan Schoolkate vs. Billy Harris
There is no head to head record between Tristan Schoolkate and Billy Harris since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Tristan Schoolkate
23 - 13win/loss
169
167
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 36-28 | 30-20 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
2023 | 44-30 | 30-23 | 4-4 | 2-2 | 8-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 48-29 | 24-15 | 17-11 | 0-0 | 7-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 24-20 | 8-9 | 3-5 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
2020 | 1-4 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 186 (career-high), Tristan got to the 2nd round after beating Ryan Seggerman 6-4 6-3, Clement Chidekh 6-1 6-2 and Emilio Nava 2-6 6-3 7-63.
In the 1st round against Nava, Tristan recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-3 7-63).During the match, Schoolkate scored less points (9) than Nava. In fact, the world no. 186 won 87 points vs Nava’s. That means that Schoolkate was more focused during the important points. Schoolkate was extremely aggressive to blast 44 winners.
Talking about the service games, Schoolkate bagged 7 aces and he was quite steady in conceding no double faults. Tristan Schoolkate lost the serve 3 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Schoolkate put 66% of his first serves in, winning 67% (44/66) of the points behind his 1st serve and 59% (20/34) on the 2nd serve. Schoolkate broke Nava twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Schoolkate has a solid win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 60% of his matches (149-101). 3-0 on grass in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Schoolkate has a compiled18-5 match record in the last 6 years on grass.
His best result of the year was winning the title the Guangzhou Challenger where he defeated Adam Walton in the final 6-3 3-6 6-3.
Schoolkate has an aggregate 23-13 win-loss record in 2024, 3-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Surbiton Challenger
The Australian has never competed in this tournament before.
Billy Harris
15 - 17win/loss
106
101
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 36-31 | 10-11 | 6-8 | 6-6 | 14-6 | 0-0 |
2023 | 59-34 | 27-15 | 7-8 | 14-5 | 11-6 | 0-0 |
2022 | 46-34 | 23-13 | 10-9 | 9-8 | 2-3 | 2-1 |
2021 | 51-20 | 13-5 | 38-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 27-13 | 19-10 | 8-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 201, Harris got to the 2nd round after defeating Juncheng Shang 6-3 7-68.
In the 1st round, Billy had a good straight sets win against Shang (6-3 7-68). During the match Harris scored 80 points vs Shang’s 64. The Brit was exceptionally aggressive to blast 43 winners.
Talking about serving, Harris managed to score 9 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Billy Harris was extremely efficient on serve to win 81% (43/53) of his 1st serve and 62% (8/13) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Brit broke Shang once after converting 17% of his break points (1/6).
Harris has a composed 15-17 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on grass (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Surbiton Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2022 and 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Schoolkate | Harris |
---|---|---|
Match played | 3 | 1 |
Tot Set | 7 | 2 |
Tot Games | 64 | 22 |
Pts | 201-177 | 80-64 |
Total Points | 378 | 144 |
Winners | 102 | 43 |
%Winners | 51% | 54% |
Schoolkate played 3 matches while Harris competed in 1 match. Schoolkate started his run from the qualifications while Harris had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Tristan Schoolkate lost 1 set while Billy Harris hasn’t lost a set so far. Schoolkate has played 5 sets more than Harris (7 vs 2). Therefore, Schoolkate played 42 games more than Harris. Tristan scored 102 winners (51% of the total points). On the other side, Billy recorded 43 winners (54%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Schoolkate | Harris |
---|---|---|
Aces | 19 | 9 |
Avg per match | 6.3 | 9 |
1st in | 138/197 | 53/66 |
%1st in | 70% | 80% |
1st pts | 102/138 | 43/53 |
%1st pts | 74% | 81% |
2nd pts | 35/59 | 8/13 |
%2nd pts | 59% | 62% |
Schoolkate scored 19 aces (6.3 per match). Harris recorded 9 aces . Schoolkate won 74% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Harris won 81% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Schoolkate | Harris |
---|---|---|
Won | 8 | 1 |
Converted | 8/18 | 1/6 |
% Converted | 44% | 17% |
Conceded | 10 | 1 |
Saved | 7 | 1 |
% Saved | 70% | 100% |
Times Broken | 3 | 0 |
The Australian broke his opponents 8 times with a 44% conversion rate. Schoolkate dropped his serve 3 times and he saved 70% of the break points that he conceded. Billy broke his opponent once with a 17% conversion rate. Harris was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 1 break points.
Schoolkate | |||||
Q1 Seggerman |
Q3 Chidekh |
R1 Nava |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-3 | 6-1 6-2 | 2-6 6-3 7-63 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 15 | 30 | 64 | |
pts | 63-48 | 51-33 | 87-96 | 201-177 | |
Total points | 111 | 84 | 183 | 378 | |
Winners | 32 | 26 | 44 | 102 | |
%Winners | 51% | 51% | 51% | 51% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 6 | 6 | 7 | 19 | |
Double Faults | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
1st in | 40/54 | 32/43 | 66/100 | 138/197 | |
% 1st in | 74% | 74% | 66% | 70% | |
1st pts | 32/40 | 26/32 | 44/66 | 102/138 | |
% 1st pts | 80% | 81% | 67% | 74% | |
2nd pts | 9/14 | 6/11 | 20/34 | 35/59 | |
% 2nd pts | 64% | 55% | 59% | 59% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 2 | 4 | 2 | 8 | |
Converted | 2/3 | 4/9 | 2/6 | 8/18 | |
Converted % | 67% | 44% | 33% | 44% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0/0 | 7/10 | 7 | |
Saved % | – | – | 70% | 23% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Harris | |||||
R1 Shang |
Total | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 7-68 | ||||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |||
Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |||
pts | 80-64 | 80-64 | |||
Total points | 144 | 144 | |||
Winners | 43 | 43 | |||
%Winners | 54% | 54% | |||
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 9 | 9 | |||
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |||
1st in | 53/66 | 53/66 | |||
% 1st in | 80% | 80% | |||
1st pts | 43/53 | 43/53 | |||
% 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |||
2nd pts | 8/13 | 8/13 | |||
% 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |||
Breaks | |||||
Won | 1 | 1 | |||
Converted | 1/6 | 1/6 | |||
Converted % | 17% | 17% | |||
Conceded | 1 | 1 | |||
Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |||
Saved % | 100% | 33% | |||
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Surbiton Challenger
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Emilio NavaNava (2-6 6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Denis ShapovalovShapovalov (6-3 7-60) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Alex MichelsenMichelsen (6-4 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Alex BoltBolt (7-63 6-0) – See score progression
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Maxime CressyCressy (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Arthur FeryFery (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Billy HarrisHarris – Juncheng ShangShang (6-3 7-68) – See score progression
- Leandro RiediRiedi – Dominic StrickerStricker (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki – Terence AtmaneAtmane (6-74 6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Sho ShimabukuroShimabukuro – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Alex MichelsenMichelsen (6-4 2-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Emilio NavaNava (2-6 6-3 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Maxime CressyCressy (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Denis ShapovalovShapovalov (6-3 7-6(0)) – See score progression
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – Alex BoltBolt (7-6(3) 6-0) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omar JasikaJasika – James DuckworthDuckworth (0-4) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Lloyd HarrisHarris (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – Daniel EvansEvans (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Billy HarrisHarris (0-0) – H2H and prediction