Ethan Quinn and Leo Borg will face off in the 1st round of the Tyler Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 4:00 pm on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ethan Quinn who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ethan Quinn is the pick to win this match.
Ethan Quinn -> 1.191
Leo Borg -> 4.333
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Ethan Quinn vs. Leo Borg
There is no head to head record between Ethan Quinn and Leo Borg since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Ethan Quinn
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-30 | 15-17 | 2-7 | 6-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 21-16 | 12-11 | 0-0 | 8-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 30-14 | 21-7 | 6-4 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 252, Quinn reached the 1st round after beating Adam Neff 6-4 6-75 6-3 and Alex Rybakov 2-6 6-2 7-62.
In the qualifications against Rybakov, Quinn recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-2 7-62). During the match, Quinn scored 97 points vs Rybakov’s 93. Quinn was quite aggressive to blast 48 winners.
Regarding the service games, Quinn scored just 1 ace throughout the encounter and he committed only 6 double faults. Ethan Quinn lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Quinn put 67% of his first serves in, winning 72% (48/67) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (16/33) on the 2nd serve. Quinn broke Rybakov twice after converting 29% of his break points (2/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Ethan started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he has surrendered 2 set in this event to win 52% of the points he played.
Quinn has a winning win-loss record in the last 4 years having won 57% of his matches (67-50). 5-6 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Quinn has an overall42-27 record in the last 4 years on hard.
The American’s best result of the year was getting to the final in the Cleveland Challenger.
The American has a composed 12-17 win-loss record in 2024, 5-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Tyler Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
Leo Borg
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21-17 | 19-8 | 1-8 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 35-30 | 22-13 | 10-8 | 3-8 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 40-29 | 13-8 | 27-20 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 1-12 | 0-0 | 1-9 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 464, the Swede got to the 1st round after defeating James Tracy 7-5 7-5.
Leo’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M15 Kingston.
Borg has a compiled 10-9 win-loss record in 2024, 9-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Quinn | Borg |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 6 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 61 | 24 |
| Pts | 210-191 | 89-77 |
| Total Points | 401 | 166 |
| Winners | 98 | 28 |
| %Winners | 47% | 31% |
Quinn played 2 matches while Borg competed in 1 match. At the moment, Ethan Quinn surrendered 2 sets while Leo Borg hasn’t conceded a set so far. Quinn has played 4 sets more than Borg (6 vs 2). Therefore, Quinn played 37 games more than Borg. Quinn scored 98 winners (47% of the total points). On the other side, Leo blasted 28 winners (31%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Quinn | Borg |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 10 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 2 |
| 1st in | 134/205 | 42/85 |
| %1st in | 65% | 49% |
| 1st pts | 98/134 | 28/42 |
| %1st pts | 73% | 67% |
| 2nd pts | 36/71 | 19/43 |
| %2nd pts | 51% | 44% |
Quinn bagged 10 aces (5 per match). Borg recorded 2 aces . Quinn won 73% points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points. On the other side, Borg won 67% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Quinn | Borg |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 6 |
| Converted | 5/23 | 6/9 |
| % Converted | 22% | 67% |
| Conceded | 13 | 10 |
| Saved | 10 | 6 |
| % Saved | 77% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 4 |
Ethan broke his opponents 5 times with a 22% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 77% of the break points that he conceded. Leo broke his opponent 6 times with a 67% conversion rate. The Swede conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Quinn | ||||
| Q1 Neff |
Q3 Rybakov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-75 6-3 | 2-6 6-2 7-62 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 29 | 61 | |
| pts | 113-98 | 97-93 | 210-191 | |
| Total points | 211 | 190 | 401 | |
| Winners | 50 | 48 | 98 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 49% | 47% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 9 | 1 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 6 | 14 | |
| 1st in | 67/105 | 67/100 | 134/205 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 67% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 50/67 | 48/67 | 98/134 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 72% | 73% | |
| 2nd pts | 20/38 | 16/33 | 36/71 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 48% | 51% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Converted | 3/16 | 2/7 | 5/23 | |
| Converted % | 19% | 29% | 22% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 5 | 13 | |
| Saved | 7/8 | 3/5 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 88% | 60% | 74% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| Borg | ||||
| Q1 Tracy |
Q3 Kirchheimer |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 7-5 | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 24 | 18 | 42 | |
| pts | 89-77 | – | 89-77 | |
| Total points | 166 | 0 | 166 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | ||
| %Winners | 31% | 0% | 31% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 8 | ||
| 1st in | 42/85 | / | 42/85 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | 0% | 49% | |
| 1st pts | 28/42 | / | 28/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 67% | 0% | 67% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/43 | / | 19/43 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 0% | 44% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 6 | 6 | ||
| Converted | 6/9 | / | 6/9 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 0% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | ||
| Saved | 6/10 | 0/ | 6 | |
| Saved % | 60% | – | 30% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | ||
Head 2 Head
LLWLWLWLWL
LWLWWWWWWW Tennis Scores in Tyler Challenger
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – Trevor SvajdaSvajda (6-4 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Cannon KingsleyKingsley (7-5 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Blaise BicknellBicknell (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (7-5 1-0 ret.) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh – Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan (7-5 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Nick ChappellChappell – Liam DraxlDraxl (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Filip PeliwoPeliwo – Tung-Lin WuWu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Andres AndradeAndrade (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-3) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicolas MejiaMejia – Ernesto EscobedoEscobedo (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moerani BouzigeBouzige – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
