Paul Jubb and Daniil Glinka will play each other in the quarter of the Kachreti Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Thursday at 12:30 pm on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Paul Jubb who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Paul Jubb is the pick to win this match.
Paul Jubb -> 1.38
Daniil Glinka -> 2.83
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Paul Jubb vs. Daniil Glinka
This will be the 2nd time that Paul Jubb and Daniil Glinka clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Glinka (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they locked horns, Glinka won 5-7 7-6(8) ret. in the semifinal in M25 Roehampton back in 2023.
Paul Jubb
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 47-27 | 26-13 | 0-2 | 12-7 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-13 | 19-9 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-26 | 7-9 | 10-4 | 12-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 51-13 | 48-10 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 323, Jubb got to the quarter after defeating Orel Kimhi 6-1 6-1 and Altug Celikbilek 6-4 7-5.
In the 2nd round, Jubb had a good straight sets win against Celikbilek (6-4 7-5). During the match, Jubb scored 76 points vs Celikbilek’s 62. Jubb was quite aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Regarding the service games, Jubb scored 6 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Paul Jubb was quite effective on serve to win 71% (32/45) of his 1st serve and 55% (16/29) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Brit broke Celikbilek 4 times after converting 33% of his break points (4/12).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Paul hasn’t dropped yet a set in this competition to win 58% of the points he played.
Jubb has a fantastic match record in the last 8 years having won 70% of his matches (197-83). 19-6 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Jubb has a composed112-41 win-loss record in the last 8 years on hard.
Paul’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Glasgow Challenger and M25 Nottingham.
Paul has an overall 28-12 win-loss record in 2024, 19-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Kachreti Challenger
The Brit has never competed in this tournament before.
Daniil Glinka
22 - 16win/loss
488
390
LLLWWWLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 37-29 | 19-14 | 0-1 | 14-12 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
| 2023 | 40-23 | 18-14 | 0-1 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 7-2 |
| 2022 | 23-29 | 17-22 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2021 | 29-31 | 9-14 | 12-11 | 8-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-11 | 10-8 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 454, Daniil got to the quarter after beating Yanki Erel 6-2 7-64 and Charles Broom 6-2 6-3.
In the 2nd round, The Estonian had a good straight sets win against Broom (6-2 6-3). During the match Glinka scored 55 points vs Broom’s 39. The Estonian was very aggressive to blast 29 winners.
About the serving games, Glinka managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Daniil Glinka conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 1 break points. Furthermore, Glinka put 61% of his first serves in, winning 94% (29/31) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (9/20) on the 2nd serve. The Estonian broke Broom 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Daniil hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
The Estonian’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in M25 Trento,M15 Poitiers,M25 Trimbach and M25 Kachreti.
Glinka has an aggregate 22-16 win-loss record in 2024, 7-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Jubb | Glinka |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 36 | 38 |
| Pts | 141-101 | 128-101 |
| Total Points | 242 | 229 |
| Winners | 57 | 65 |
| %Winners | 40% | 51% |
Both Jubb and Glinka played 2 matches. Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Jubb and Glinka have played the same amount of sets 4. However, Jubb played 2 games less than Glinka. Paul scored 57 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Glinka managed to score 65 winners (51%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Jubb | Glinka |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 13 | 18 |
| Avg per match | 6.5 | 9 |
| 1st in | 76/116 | 81/115 |
| %1st in | 66% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 57/76 | 65/81 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 22/40 | 21/34 |
| %2nd pts | 55% | 62% |
Jubb struck 13 aces (6.5 per match). Glinka managed to score 18 aces (9 per match). Jubb won 75% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 55% of the points. On the other side, Glinka won 80% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 62% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Jubb | Glinka |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 5 |
| Converted | 9/24 | 5/13 |
| % Converted | 38% | 38% |
| Conceded | 5 | 4 |
| Saved | 3 | 4 |
| % Saved | 60% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 0 |
Jubb broke his opponents 9 times with a 38% conversion rate. Paul surrendered his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. The Estonian broke his opponents 5 times with a 38% conversion rate. The Estonian was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 4 break points.
| Jubb | ||||
| R1 Kimhi |
R2 Celikbilek |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-1 | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 22 | 36 | |
| pts | 65-39 | 76-62 | 141-101 | |
| Total points | 104 | 138 | 242 | |
| Winners | 25 | 32 | 57 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 42% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 7 | 6 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 31/42 | 45/74 | 76/116 | |
| % 1st in | 74% | 61% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 25/31 | 32/45 | 57/76 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 71% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/11 | 16/29 | 22/40 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 9 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 4/12 | 9/24 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 33% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | – | 60% | 30% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| Glinka | ||||
| R1 Erel |
R2 Broom |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 7-64 | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 17 | 38 | |
| pts | 73-62 | 55-39 | 128-101 | |
| Total points | 135 | 94 | 229 | |
| Winners | 36 | 29 | 65 | |
| %Winners | 49% | 53% | 51% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 13 | 5 | 18 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 50/64 | 31/51 | 81/115 | |
| % 1st in | 78% | 61% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 36/50 | 29/31 | 65/81 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 94% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/14 | 9/20 | 21/34 | |
| % 2nd pts | 86% | 45% | 62% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
| Converted | 2/7 | 3/6 | 5/13 | |
| Converted % | 29% | 50% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 1/1 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWWLWLL
LLLWWWLWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Blake MottMott – Aleksandre BakshiBakshi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – Daniil GlinkaGlinka (0-1) – H2H and prediction
