Hailey Baptiste and Sinja Kraus will clash against each other in the qualifications of the French Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 12:00 pm on Court 4. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Hailey Baptiste who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Hailey Baptiste is the pick to win this match.
Hailey Baptiste -> 1.46
Sinja Kraus -> 2.64
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Hailey Baptiste vs. Sinja Kraus
There is no head to head record between Hailey Baptiste and Sinja Kraus since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Hailey Baptiste
25 - 14win/loss
92
80
LWWLWWWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 43-27 | 29-16 | 10-8 | 3-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 41-32 | 17-15 | 22-15 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 23-19 | 12-11 | 11-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 18-21 | 8-12 | 7-6 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-10 | 6-8 | 3-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 108, the American got to the qualifications after beating Valentini Grammatikopoulou 3-6 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications against Grammatikopoulou, Baptiste recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-4 6-3). During the match, Baptiste scored 101 points vs Grammatikopoulou’s 89. Hailey was quite aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about the service games, Baptiste scored 4 aces and she committed only 4 double faults. Hailey Baptiste lost the serve 4 times and she saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Baptiste put 48% of her first serves in, winning 71% (34/48) of the points behind her 1st serve and 49% (26/53) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Grammatikopoulou 5 times after converting 42% of her break points (5/12).
Baptiste has a solid match record in the last 9 years having won 60% of her matches (179-121). 8-6 on clay in 2024. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Baptiste has a compiled83-50 record in the last 9 years on clay.
Hailey’s best result of the season was getting to the final in the W50 Morelia.
Hailey has an aggregate 25-14 win-loss record in 2024, 8-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the French Open
Sinja Kraus
17 - 14win/loss
221
151
LWWLLWWLLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 43-24 | 3-2 | 27-12 | 11-9 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2023 | 31-31 | 1-8 | 26-16 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 51-33 | 2-9 | 46-20 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 43-27 | 7-6 | 31-14 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 10-8 | 2-2 | 3-3 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 245, Kraus reached the qualifications after defeating Elizabeth Mandlik 7-66 3-6 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Austrian defeated Mandlik (7-66 3-6 6-4).During the match Kraus scored less points (3) than Mandlik. In fact, the world no. 108 won 104 points vs Mandlik’s. That means that Kraus was more focused during the important points. Sinja was quite aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about serving, Kraus scored 5 aces and she committed only 2 double faults. Sinja Kraus lost the serve 7 times and she saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Kraus put 69% of her first serves in, winning 55% (41/75) of the points behind her 1st serve and 45% (15/33) on the 2nd serve. The Austrian broke Mandlik 6 times after converting 55% of her break points (6/11).
The Austrian’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the W75+H Porto.
Sinja has a compiled 17-14 win-loss record in 2024, 8-6 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously at the French Open
Previously, her best result was reaching the qualifications in 2023. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Baptiste | Kraus |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 28 | 32 |
| Pts | 101-89 | 104-107 |
| Total Points | 190 | 211 |
| Winners | 34 | 41 |
| %Winners | 34% | 39% |
Both Baptiste and Kraus played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Hailey Baptiste conceded 1 set, while Sinja Kraus lost 1 set. Talking about their workload, Baptiste and Kraus have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Baptiste played 4 games less than Kraus. Hailey scored 34 winners (34% of the total points). On the other side, The Austrian scored 41 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Baptiste | Kraus |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 5 |
| 1st in | 48/101 | 75/108 |
| %1st in | 48% | 69% |
| 1st pts | 34/48 | 41/75 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 55% |
| 2nd pts | 26/53 | 15/33 |
| %2nd pts | 49% | 45% |
Baptiste made 4 aces . Kraus struck 5 aces . Baptiste won 71% points behind her first serve. She pretty solid on her second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Kraus won 55% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Baptiste | Kraus |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 6 |
| Converted | 5/12 | 6/11 |
| % Converted | 42% | 55% |
| Conceded | 10 | 12 |
| Saved | 6 | 5 |
| % Saved | 60% | 42% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 7 |
Hailey broke her opponent 5 times with a 42% conversion rate. The American lost her serve 4 times and she saved 60% of the break points that she conceded. Kraus broke her opponent 6 times with a 55% conversion rate. The Austrian conceded her serve 7 times and she saved 42% of the break points that she conceded.
| Baptiste | |||
| Q1 Grammatikopoulou |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 28 | |
| pts | 101-89 | 101-89 | |
| Total points | 190 | 190 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 34% | 34% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 48/101 | 48/101 | |
| % 1st in | 48% | 48% | |
| 1st pts | 34/48 | 34/48 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 26/53 | 26/53 | |
| % 2nd pts | 49% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/12 | 5/12 | |
| Converted % | 42% | 42% | |
| Conceded | 10 | 10 | |
| Saved | 6/10 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Kraus | |||
| Q1 Mandlik |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-66 3-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | 32 | |
| pts | 104-107 | 104-107 | |
| Total points | 211 | 211 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 75/108 | 75/108 | |
| % 1st in | 69% | 69% | |
| 1st pts | 41/75 | 41/75 | |
| % 1st pts | 55% | 55% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/33 | 15/33 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 6 | 6 | |
| Converted | 6/11 | 6/11 | |
| Converted % | 55% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
| Saved | 5/12 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 42% | 42% | |
| Times Broken | 7 | 7 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLWWWWLW
LWWLLWWLLW Tennis Scores – French Open
- Markus ErikssonEriksson – Walter TrusendiTrusendi (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva – Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva (7-5 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Enzo CouacaudCouacaud – Bruno Sant’AnnaSant’Anna (6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jan SatralSatral – Andrea GuerrieriGuerrieri (6-1 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Riccardo BonadioBonadio – Elmar EjupovicEjupovic (6-4 3-6 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mate ValkuszValkusz – Fabrizio OrnagoOrnago (1-6 6-1 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Bernardo SaraivaSaraiva (6-2 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jonathan MridhaMridha – Artem DubrivnyyDubrivnyy (6-1 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Anna BondarBondar – Anastasia ZakharovaZakharova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Dalila JakupovicJakupovic – Irina Maria BaraMaria Bara (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Miriam Bianca BulgaruBianca Bulgaru – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marina Bassols RiberaBassols Ribera – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katarina ZavatskaZavatska – Yulia StarodubtsewaStarodubtsewa (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mai HontamaHontama – Carol ZhaoZhao (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cristina DinuDinu – Paula OrmaecheaOrmaechea (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Katarzyna KawaKawa – Gabriela Andrea KnutsonAndrea Knutson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elvina KalievaKalieva – Laura PigossiPigossi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emiliana ArangoArango – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sara ErraniErrani – Alice TubelloTubello (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Elena Gabriela RuseGabriela Ruse – Suzan LamensLamens (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Julia RieraRiera – Harmony TanTan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Eva LysLys – Lulu SunSun (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Leolia JeanjeanJeanjean – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jule NiemeierNiemeier – Lauren DavisDavis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Anastasia TikhonovaTikhonova – Dalma GalfiGalfi (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Hailey BaptisteBaptiste – Sinja KrausKraus (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Moyuka UchijimaUchijima – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Raluca Georgiana SerbanGeorgiana Serban – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Olga DanilovicDanilovic – Kimberly BirrellBirrell (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Timea BabosBabos – Astra SharmaSharma (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aliaksandra SasnovichSasnovich – Zeynep SonmezSonmez (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Lea BoskovicBoskovic – Jana FettFett (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Veronika ErjavecErjavec – Irene Burillo EscorihuelaBurillo Escorihuela (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jil TeichmannTeichmann – Sijia WeiWei (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rebecca SramkovaSramkova – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Priscilla HonHon – Panna UdvardyUdvardy (1-0) – H2H and prediction
