James Duckworth and Ramkumar Ramanathan will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Taipei Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 12:00 pm on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is James Duckworth who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, James Duckworth is the pick to win this match.
James Duckworth -> 1.28
Ramkumar Ramanathan -> 3.45
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head James Duckworth vs. Ramkumar Ramanathan
This will be the 2nd time that James Duckworth and Ramkumar Ramanathan fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Duckworth (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they locked horns, Duckworth won 7-6(8) 6-2 in the semifinal in the Pune Challenger back in 2019.
James Duckworth
21 - 11win/loss
77
46
LLLWWLWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 42-28 | 23-14 | 2-3 | 7-6 | 10-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 51-28 | 43-21 | 1-3 | 5-2 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-27 | 20-18 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 4-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 36-24 | 15-9 | 1-2 | 12-9 | 8-4 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-10 | 9-4 | 1-2 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 102, James got to the 2nd round after defeating Mukund Sasikumar 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, Duckworth had a good straight sets win against Kumar Mukund (6-3 6-4). During the match, Duckworth scored 67 points vs Kumar Mukund’s 50. Duckworth was pretty aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Regarding the service games, Duckworth fired 6 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, James Duckworth was quite effective on serve to win 81% (22/27) of his 1st serve and 59% (17/29) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Australian broke Kumar Mukund 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Duckworth has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (290-187). 14-7 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Duckworth has an overall 209-116 match record in the last years on hard.
James’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the Shenzhen 1 Challenger.
Duckworth has a compiled 21-11 win-loss record in 2024, 14-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Taipei Challenger
Ramkumar Ramanathan
17 - 9win/loss
309
111
LLLWLWLWWL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 23-25 | 22-22 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 25-21 | 25-12 | 0-6 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 15-34 | 4-13 | 4-8 | 2-6 | 4-6 | 1-1 |
| 2021 | 45-32 | 23-11 | 8-7 | 5-8 | 7-4 | 2-2 |
| 2020 | 8-18 | 3-8 | 0-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 5-2 |
Ranked no. 358, Ramkumar got to the 2nd round after defeating Bang Shuo Yin 6-4 6-4.
In the 1st round, Ramkumar had a good straight sets win against Shuo Yin (6-4 6-4). During the match Ramanathan scored 73 points vs Shuo Yin’s 60. The Indian was pretty aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about serving, Ramanathan struck 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Ramkumar Ramanathan was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 71% (32/45) of his 1st serve and 65% (17/26) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Indian broke Shuo Yin twice after converting 67% of his break points (2/3).
The Indian’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in M25 New Delhi and M15 Chandigarh.
Ramkumar has a compiled 17-9 win-loss record in 2024, 16-9 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Duckworth | Ramanathan |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 20 |
| Pts | 67-50 | 73-60 |
| Total Points | 117 | 133 |
| Winners | 22 | 32 |
| %Winners | 33% | 44% |
Both Duckworth and Ramanathan played 1 match. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Duckworth and Ramanathan have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Duckworth played 1 game less than Ramanathan. James scored 22 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, Ramkumar blasted 32 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Duckworth | Ramanathan |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 5 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 5 |
| 1st in | 27/56 | 45/71 |
| %1st in | 48% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 22/27 | 32/45 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 17/29 | 17/26 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 65% |
Duckworth fired 6 aces . Ramanathan made 5 aces . Duckworth won 81% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Ramanathan won 71% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 65% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Duckworth | Ramanathan |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 2 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 2/3 |
| % Converted | 50% | 67% |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 |
| Saved | 4 | 5 |
| % Saved | 80% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
The Australian broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. James surrendered his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded. Ramkumar broke his opponent twice with a 67% conversion rate. Ramkumar was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 5 break points.
| Duckworth | |||
| R1 Kumar Mukund |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 67-50 | 67-50 | |
| Total points | 117 | 117 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 27/56 | 27/56 | |
| % 1st in | 48% | 48% | |
| 1st pts | 22/27 | 22/27 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/29 | 17/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Ramanathan | |||
| R1 Shuo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 73-60 | 73-60 | |
| Total points | 133 | 133 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 45/71 | 45/71 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 32/45 | 32/45 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/26 | 17/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 65% | 65% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/3 | 2/3 | |
| Converted % | 67% | 67% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 5/5 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLLLWWWW
LLLWLWLWWL Tennis Scores in Taipei Challenger
- Adam WaltonWalton – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (7-65 6-0) – See score progression
- Max PurcellPurcell – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (6-73 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Ji Sung NamSung Nam – Yunseong ChungChung (6-4 7-60) – See score progression
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – Bang Shuo YinShuo Yin (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Blake EllisEllis – Tsung-Hao HuangHuang (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Ricardas BerankisBerankis – Brandon HoltHolt (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama (7-65 6-3) – See score progression
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Mukund SasikumarSasikumar (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (6-3 7-64) – See score progression
- Remy BertolaBertola – Ray HoHo (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Moez EcharguiEchargui (7-67 6-2) – See score progression
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – James McCabeMcCabe (6-1 4-6 7-64) – See score progression
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Omar JasikaJasika (6-4 7-68) – See score progression
- Arthur FeryFery – Tung-Lin WuWu (6-1 7-5) – See score progression
- Li TuTu – Philip SekulicSekulic (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Alafia AyeniAyeni (7-62 6-3) – See score progression
- Max PurcellPurcell – James Kent TrotterKent Trotter (6-7(3) 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Remy BertolaBertola – Ray HoHo (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Hiroki MoriyaMoriya (6-3 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy – Omar JasikaJasika (6-4 7-6(8)) – See score progression
- Rio NoguchiNoguchi – Alafia AyeniAyeni (7-6(2) 6-3) – See score progression
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – James McCabeMcCabe (6-1 4-6 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Ricardas BerankisBerankis – Brandon HoltHolt (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Illya MarchenkoMarchenko – Evgeny DonskoyDonskoy (5-1) – H2H and prediction
- Antoine EscoffierEscoffier – Richard BerankisBerankis (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Ji Sung NamSung Nam – Adam WaltonWalton (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ramkumar RamanathanRamanathan – James DuckworthDuckworth (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – Remy BertolaBertola (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Blake EllisEllis – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (0-2) – H2H and prediction
