Damien Wenger and Matthew Dellavedova will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Francavilla Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on GRANDSTAND. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Damien Wenger who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Damien Wenger is the pick to win this match.
Damien Wenger -> 1.4
Matthew Dellavedova -> 2.8
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Damien Wenger vs. Matthew Dellavedova
This will be the 2nd time that Damien Wenger and Matthew Dellavedova square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Wenger (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they squared off, Wenger won 6-1 6-1 in the 2nd round in M25 Grasse back in 2023.
Damien Wenger
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 34-23 | 4-2 | 30-21 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-26 | 0-0 | 46-24 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2022 | 46-24 | 0-0 | 46-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 63-22 | 0-0 | 63-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-12 | 0-1 | 16-6 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
Ranked no. 383, Damien reached the qualifications after beating Rocco Piatti 6-0 6-2.
In the qualifications, Wenger had a good straight sets win against Piatti (6-0 6-2). During the match, Wenger scored 53 points vs Piatti’s 23. Wenger was very aggressive to blast 22 winners.
Talking about the service games, Wenger couldn’t to score even 1 ace during the match and he committed only 2 double faults. Damien Wenger conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 65% of his first serves in, win 85% (22/26) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (7/14) on the 2nd serve. Wenger broke Piatti 5 times after converting 83% of his break points (5/6).
Wenger has a solid match record in the last 8 years having won 65% of his matches (249-134). 15-9 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Wenger has an overall240-120 win-loss record in the last 8 years on clay.
Wenger’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in the Kigali 2 Challenger.
Wenger has a compiled 15-9 win-loss record in 2024, 15-9 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Francavilla Challenger
Damien has never competed in this tournament before.
Matthew Dellavedova
10 - 15win/loss
357
356
WLWWLWLWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 50-40 | 16-14 | 33-23 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 55-35 | 35-17 | 15-15 | 1-1 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 63-40 | 56-29 | 7-9 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 32-33 | 18-18 | 14-12 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 435, Dellavedova got to the qualifications after defeating Samuele Pieri 6-1 6-4.
In the qualifications, Matthew had a good straight sets win against Pieri (6-1 6-4). During the match Dellavedova scored 68 points vs Pieri’s 48. The Australian was extremely aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about serving, Dellavedova was unable to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Matthew Dellavedova lost the serve once and he saved 1 break points. Furthermore, Dellavedova put 77% of his first serves in, winning 70% (28/40) of the points behind his 1st serve and 58% (7/12) on the 2nd serve. Dellavedova broke Pieri 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
The Australian’s best result of the current season was getting to the semifinal in M25 Faro.
Matthew has a compiled 10-15 win-loss record in 2024, 5-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Wenger | Dellavedova |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 14 | 17 |
| Pts | 53-23 | 68-48 |
| Total Points | 76 | 116 |
| Winners | 22 | 28 |
| %Winners | 42% | 41% |
Both Wenger and Dellavedova played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Wenger and Dellavedova have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Wenger played 3 games less than Dellavedova. The Swiss scored 22 winners (42% of the total points). On the other side, Matthew recorded 28 winners (41%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Wenger | Dellavedova |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 0 |
| 1st in | 26/40 | 40/52 |
| %1st in | 65% | 77% |
| 1st pts | 22/26 | 28/40 |
| %1st pts | 85% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 7/14 | 7/12 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 58% |
Wenger didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Dellavedova also didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Wenger won 85% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Dellavedova won 70% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Wenger | Dellavedova |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/6 | 4/7 |
| % Converted | 83% | 57% |
| Conceded | 0 | 2 |
| Saved | 0 | 1 |
| % Saved | 0% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Damien broke his opponent 5 times with a 83% conversion rate. Wenger pretty solid on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. The Australian broke his opponent 4 times with a 57% conversion rate. Dellavedova conceded his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Wenger | |||
| Q1 Piatti |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 53-23 | 53-23 | |
| Total points | 76 | 76 | |
| Winners | 22 | 22 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 26/40 | 26/40 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 22/26 | 22/26 | |
| % 1st pts | 85% | 85% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/14 | 7/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/6 | 5/6 | |
| Converted % | 83% | 83% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Dellavedova | |||
| Q1 Pieri |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 68-48 | 68-48 | |
| Total points | 116 | 116 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 40/52 | 40/52 | |
| % 1st in | 77% | 77% | |
| 1st pts | 28/40 | 28/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 70% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/12 | 7/12 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWLWWW
WLWWLWLWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Alessandro GiannessiGiannessi – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Franco AgamenoneAgamenone – Stefano TravagliaTravaglia (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Hugo DellienDellien – Gianluca MagerMager (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marco CecchinatoCecchinato – Alexander WeisWeis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ivan GakhovGakhov – Jacopo BerrettiniBerrettini (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco – Andrea PellegrinoPellegrino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nick HardtHardt – Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea GuerrieriGuerrieri – Dan AddedAdded (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matthew DellavedovaDellavedova – Damien WengerWenger (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Adrian AndreevAndreev – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oliver CrawfordCrawford – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Jules MarieMarie (0-0) – H2H and prediction
