Maxime Cressy and Tristan Schoolkate will play each other in the semifinal of the Guangzhou Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 11:00 am on COURT 2. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.

Prediction, odds and live streaming

The pick for Tennis Tonic is Maxime Cressy who should win in 2 sets.

As per the initial odds, Maxime Cressy is the pick to win this match.
Maxime Cressy -> 1.39
Tristan Schoolkate -> 2.79

Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).

To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.

Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).

At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.

 

Prediction and head to head Maxime Cressy vs. Tristan Schoolkate

There is no head to head record between Maxime Cressy and Tristan Schoolkate since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.

Maxime Cressy

Maxime Cressy

17 - 9win/loss

Hard
11-6
I Hard
6-3
Rank
176
High
31
WLWWLWLLLL
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2024 21-15 11-8 0-1 6-3 4-3 0-0
2023 19-31 3-10 0-5 15-10 1-5 0-1
2022 34-30 15-11 5-7 3-8 11-4 0-0
2021 43-32 14-10 2-8 16-8 4-4 7-2
2020 19-17 3-5 2-4 14-7 0-0 0-1

Ranked no. 178, the American reached the semifinal after defeating Hiroki Moriya 6-3 6-3, Mark Lajal 6-3 3-6 6-3 and Yuta Shimizu 6-4 4-6 7-63.

In the quarter, The American defeated Shimizu (6-4 4-6 7-63). During the match, Cressy scored 124 points vs Shimizu’s 120. Maxime was extremely aggressive to blast 50 winners.

Regarding the service games, Cressy made 19 aces and he was not very consistent on his 2nd serve to score 17 double faults. Maxime Cressy lost the serve twice and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Cressy put 50% of his first serves in, winning 82% (50/61) of the points behind his 1st serve and 47% (28/60) on the 2nd serve. Cressy broke Shimizu twice after converting 15% of his break points (2/13).

Overall Performance in this tournament

Maxime has lost 2 set in this competition to conquer 53% of the points he played.

Cressy has a winning record in the last 8 years having won 58% of his matches (232-170). 11-6 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Cressy has a compiled108-76 match record in the last 8 years on hard.

Maxime’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in the Cuernavaca Challenger.

Maxime has a compiled 17-9 win-loss record in 2024, 11-6 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Previously in the Guangzhou Challenger

The American has never competed in this tournament before.

Guangzhou Challenger
Cressy's Record

Tristan Schoolkate

Tristan Schoolkate

17 - 12win/loss

Hard
17-10
I Hard
0-0
Clay
0-2
Rank
179
High
179
LLLWWLWWWL
Year Total Hard Clay I.hard Grass Carpet
2024 25-17 20-11 0-2 0-0 5-4 0-0
2023 44-30 30-23 4-4 2-2 8-1 0-0
2022 48-29 24-15 17-11 0-0 7-3 0-0
2021 24-20 8-9 3-5 11-5 0-0 2-1
2020 1-4 1-3 0-0 0-0 0-1 0-0

Ranked no. 241, Tristan reached the semifinal after defeating Denis Yevseyev 6-2 3-0 ret., Mattia Bellucci 6-0 7-65 and Yu Hsiou Hsu 3-6 6-4 7-5.

In the quarter against Hsiou Hsu, Tristan recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-4 7-5). During the match Schoolkate scored 111 points vs Hsiou Hsu’s 106. The Australian was exceptionally aggressive to blast 48 winners.

About the serving games, Schoolkate fired 11 aces and he committed only 9 double faults. Tristan Schoolkate lost the serve 4 times and he saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Schoolkate put 58% of his first serves in, winning 73% (48/66) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (21/48) on the 2nd serve. Schoolkate broke Hsiou Hsu 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).

Overall Performance in this tournament

Schoolkate has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.

Tristan’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Burnie 2 Challenger.

Tristan has a composed 17-12 win-loss record in 2024, 17-10 on hard (See FULL STATS).

Guangzhou Challenger
Schoolkate's Record

H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)

M.Cressy
T.Schoolkate
7h:07
7h:07
Time on court​
4h:52
4h:52
!
3h:09
3h:09
Last match​
!
2h:40
2h:40
3
3
Match played
3
3
78
78
Games Played​
61
61
8
8
Set played​​
8
8
294
294
Total points​
228
228
98
98
Avg point​
76
76
118
118
Winners
88
88
39.3
39.3
Avg Winners​
29.3
29.3
40%
40%
Ratio winners
39%
39%
-- Serve --
38
38
Aces
25
25
!
12.7
12.7
Avg Aces
8.3
8.3
42
42
Double Faults
10
10
!
14
14
Avg Double Faults
3.3
3.3
118/145
118/145
1st won total​
88/115
88/115
!
81%
81%
1st won %
!
77%
77%
58/125
58/125
2nd won total​
43/82
43/82
46%
46%
2nd won %
52%
52%
-- Break Points --
9/32
9/32
BP won
12/38
12/38
3/10.7
3/10.7
Avg BP won
4/12.7
4/12.7
!
28%
28%
Won
32%
32%
16
16
Conceded
17
17
5.3
5.3
Avg Conceded
5.7
5.7
5
5
Broken
6
6
1.7
1.7
Avg Broken
2
2
11
11
Saved
11
11

Matches, sets, games and points

Points Cressy Schoolkate
Match played 3 3
Tot Set 8 8
Tot Games 78 61
Pts 294-259 228-181
Total Points 553 409
Winners 118 88
%Winners 40% 39%

Both Cressy and Schoolkate played 3 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Maxime Cressy conceded 2 sets, while Tristan Schoolkate surrendered 1 set. Talking about their workload, Cressy and Schoolkate have played the same amount of sets 8. However, Cressy played 17 games more than Schoolkate. Cressy scored 118 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Schoolkate made 88 winners (39%).

Serve Performance

Serve Cressy Schoolkate
Aces 38 25
Avg per match 12.7 8.3
1st in 145/270 115/197
%1st in 54% 58%
1st pts 118/145 88/115
%1st pts 81% 77%
2nd pts 58/125 43/82
%2nd pts 46% 52%

Cressy struck 38 aces (12.7 per match). Schoolkate bagged 25 aces (8.3 per match). Cressy won 81% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 46% of the points. On the other side, Schoolkate won 77% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 52% of the points.

How they played the important points

Breaks Cressy Schoolkate
Won 9 12
Converted 9/32 12/38
% Converted 28% 32%
Conceded 16 17
Saved 11 11
% Saved 69% 65%
Times Broken 5 6

Cressy broke his opponents 9 times with a 28% conversion rate. Cressy lost his serve 5 times and he saved 69% of the break points that he conceded. Tristan broke his opponents 12 times with a 32% conversion rate. Tristan conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 65% of the break points that he conceded.

Cressy
R1
Moriya
R2
Lajal
1/4
Shimizu
Total
Score 6-3 6-3 6-3 3-6 6-3 6-4 4-6 7-63
Tot Set 2 3 3 8
Tot Games 18 27 33 78
pts 82-64 88-75 124-120 294-259
Total points 146 163 244 553
Winners 25 43 50 118
%Winners 30% 49% 40% 40%
SERVE
Aces 10 9 19 38
Double Faults 14 11 17 42
1st in 31/61 53/88 61/121 145/270
% 1st in 51% 60% 50% 54%
1st pts 25/31 43/53 50/61 118/145
% 1st pts 81% 81% 82% 81%
2nd pts 14/30 16/35 28/60 58/125
% 2nd pts 47% 46% 47% 46%
Breaks
Won 4 3 2 9
Converted 4/16 3/3 2/13 9/32
Converted % 25% 100% 15% 28%
Conceded 4 6 6 16
Saved 3/4 4/6 4/6 11
Saved % 75% 67% 67% 70%
Times Broken 1 2 2 5
Schoolkate
R1
Yevseyev
R2
Bellucci
1/4
Hsiou
Total
Score 6-2 3-0 ret. 6-0 7-65 3-6 6-4 7-5
Tot Set 2 2 3 7
Tot Games 11 19 31 61
pts 46-22 71-53 111-106 228-181
Total points 68 124 217 409
Winners 16 24 48 88
%Winners 35% 34% 43% 39%
SERVE
Aces 5 9 11 25
Double Faults 0 1 9 10
1st in 20/34 29/49 66/114 115/197
% 1st in 59% 59% 58% 58%
1st pts 16/20 24/29 48/66 88/115
% 1st pts 80% 83% 73% 77%
2nd pts 8/14 14/20 21/48 43/82
% 2nd pts 57% 70% 44% 52%
Breaks
Won 4 4 4 12
Converted 4/8 4/19 4/11 12/38
Converted % 50% 21% 36% 32%
Conceded 2 1 14 17
Saved 1/2 0/1 10/14 11
Saved % 50% 0% 71% 40%
Times Broken 1 1 4 6

Tennis Scores in Guangzhou Challenger

  • Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkateYu Hsiou HsuHsiou Hsu (3-6 6-4 7-5) – See score progression
  • Adam WaltonWaltonBeibit ZhukayevZhukayev (6-3 5-7 7-5) – See score progression
  • Bu YunchaoketeYunchaoketeJames DuckworthDuckworth (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
  • Maxime CressyCressyYuta ShimizuShimizu (6-4 4-6 7-63) – See score progression
  • Remy Bertola/Antoine EscoffierBertola/Antoine EscoffierPiotr Matuszewski/Matthew Christopher RomiosMatuszewski/Matthew Christopher Romios (6-75 7-5 10-3) – See score progression
  • Ji Sung Nam/Patrik Niklas-SalminenSung Nam/Patrik Niklas-SalminenLuke Saville/Li TuSaville/Li Tu (6-72 7-64 10-4) – See score progression
  • Adam WaltonWaltonBeibit ZhukayevZhukayev (6-3 5-7 7-5) – See score progression

Upcoming matches in the draw