Hernan Casanova and Felix Corwin will play each other in the 2nd round of the San Miguel de Tucuman Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 11:00 am on CANCHA 2. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Hernan Casanova who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Hernan Casanova is the pick to win this match.
Hernan Casanova -> 1.31
Felix Corwin -> 3.25
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Hernan Casanova vs. Felix Corwin
There is no head to head record between Hernan Casanova and Felix Corwin since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Hernan Casanova
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 27-24 | 0-0 | 27-23 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-27 | 0-2 | 29-25 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 43-22 | 0-0 | 43-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 45-32 | 3-3 | 42-28 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-5 | 0-0 | 9-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 384, the Argentine reached the 2nd round after beating Igor Gimenez 3-6 6-4 6-2.
In the 1st round against Gimenez, Casanova recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-4 6-2). During the match, Casanova scored 87 points vs Gimenez’s 73. Casanova was very aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Regarding the service games, Casanova recorded 2 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Hernan Casanova lost the serve twice and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Casanova put 78% of his first serves in, winning 68% (40/59) of the points behind his 1st serve and 76% (13/17) on the 2nd serve. The Argentine broke Gimenez 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Casanova has a solid match record in the last 9 years having won 64% of his matches (333-190). 15-11 on clay in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Casanova has a compiled330-183 record in the last 9 years on clay.
The Argentine’s best result of the season was reaching the semifinal in M25 Punta del Este and M25 Badalona.
Hernan has an aggregate 15-11 win-loss record in 2024, 15-11 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the San Miguel de Tucuman Challenger
The Argentine has never competed in this tournament before.
Felix Corwin
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 31-22 | 9-6 | 17-11 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 28-13 | 8-3 | 15-7 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-14 | 9-5 | 12-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 31-30 | 24-20 | 2-3 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 21-15 | 19-13 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 714, Felix reached the 2nd round after beating Ivan Denisov 7-5 4-6 6-2, Ezequiel Simonit 6-73 7-66 6-1 and Jacob Brumm 6-1 6-3.
In the 1st round, The American had a good straight sets win against Brumm (6-1 6-3). During the match Corwin scored 66 points vs Brumm’s 49. Felix was very aggressive to blast 24 winners.
About the serving games, Corwin fired 4 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Felix Corwin was quite effective on serve to win 77% (24/31) of his 1st serve and 54% (15/28) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Felix broke Brumm 4 times after converting 44% of his break points (4/9).
Felix has an aggregate 12-7 win-loss record in 2024, 10-5 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Casanova | Corwin |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 27 | 79 |
| Pts | 87-73 | 297-243 |
| Total Points | 160 | 540 |
| Winners | 40 | 111 |
| %Winners | 46% | 37% |
Casanova played 1 match while Corwin competed in 3 matches. Corwin started his run from the qualifications while Casanova had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Hernan Casanova conceded 1 set, while Felix Corwin lost 2 sets. Casanova has played 5 set(s) less than Corwin (3 vs 8). Therefore, Casanova played 52 games less than Corwin. The Argentine scored 40 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, The American fired 111 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Casanova | Corwin |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 13 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 4.3 |
| 1st in | 59/76 | 137/255 |
| %1st in | 78% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 40/59 | 111/137 |
| %1st pts | 68% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 13/17 | 52/118 |
| %2nd pts | 76% | 44% |
Casanova managed to score 2 aces . Corwin recorded 13 aces (4.3 per match). Casanova won 68% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 76% of the points. On the other side, Corwin won 81% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 44% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Casanova | Corwin |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 15 |
| Converted | 3/8 | 15/43 |
| % Converted | 38% | 35% |
| Conceded | 9 | 17 |
| Saved | 7 | 10 |
| % Saved | 78% | 59% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 7 |
Hernan broke his opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. Hernan conceded his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded. Corwin broke his opponents 15 times with a 35% conversion rate. Felix conceded his serve 7 times and he saved 59% of the break points that he conceded.
| Casanova | |||
| R1 Gimenez |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 87-73 | 87-73 | |
| Total points | 160 | 160 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 59/76 | 59/76 | |
| % 1st in | 78% | 78% | |
| 1st pts | 40/59 | 40/59 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 68% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/17 | 13/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 76% | 76% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 3/8 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 7/9 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 78% | 78% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Corwin | |||||
| Q1 Denisov |
Q3 Simonit |
R1 Brumm |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 4-6 6-2 | 6-73 7-66 6-1 | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 33 | 16 | 79 | |
| pts | 107-87 | 124-107 | 66-49 | 297-243 | |
| Total points | 194 | 231 | 115 | 540 | |
| Winners | 37 | 50 | 24 | 111 | |
| %Winners | 35% | 40% | 36% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 7 | 4 | 13 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 5 | 4 | 15 | |
| 1st in | 47/81 | 59/115 | 31/59 | 137/255 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 51% | 53% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 37/47 | 50/59 | 24/31 | 111/137 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 85% | 77% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/34 | 25/56 | 15/28 | 52/118 | |
| % 2nd pts | 35% | 45% | 54% | 44% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 7 | 4 | 4 | 15 | |
| Converted | 7/22 | 4/12 | 4/9 | 15/43 | |
| Converted % | 32% | 33% | 44% | 35% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 6 | 3 | 17 | |
| Saved | 3/8 | 4/6 | 3/3 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 38% | 67% | 100% | 205% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 2 | 0 | 7 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLLLWWLL
LLWWLWWLWW Tennis Scores in San Miguel De Tucuman Challenger
- Franco RoncadelliRoncadelli – Ignacio MonzonMonzon (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Valerio AboianAboian – Pedro Boscardin DiasBoscardin Dias (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Bautista VilicichVilicich – Bruno FernandezFernandez (3-6 6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Felix CorwinCorwin – Jacob BrummBrumm (6-1 6-3) – See score progression
- Lorenzo Joaquin RodriguezJoaquin Rodriguez – Nikos LehmannLehmann (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Juan Bautista OteguiBautista Otegui – Leonid SheyngezikhtSheyngezikht (6-2 7-5) – See score progression
- Renzo OlivoOlivo – Kaichi UchidaUchida (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva – Alejo Lorenzo Lingua LavallenLorenzo Lingua Lavallen (7-61 6-3) – See score progression
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Tomas FarjatFarjat (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Mariano KestelboimKestelboim – Ignacio CarouCarou (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Guido Ivan JustoIvan Justo – Maximo ZeituneZeitune (4-6 6-3 6-0) – See score progression
- Lautaro MidonMidon – Luciano Emanuel AmbrogiEmanuel Ambrogi (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva – Juan Carlos Prado AngeloCarlos Prado Angelo (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Ergi KirkinKirkin – Leonardo AboianAboian (6-3 6-1) – See score progression
- Hernan CasanovaCasanova – Igor GimenezGimenez (3-6 6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Jose PereiraPereira (6-3 3-6 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel Dutra Da SilvaDutra Da Silva – Ergi KirkinKirkin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrea CollariniCollarini – Lorenzo Joaquin RodriguezJoaquin Rodriguez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hernan CasanovaCasanova – Felix CorwinCorwin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mariano KestelboimKestelboim – Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva (5-3) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Bautista OteguiBautista Otegui – Renzo OlivoOlivo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Genaro Alberto OlivieriAlberto Olivieri – Franco RoncadelliRoncadelli (0-0) – H2H and prediction
