Marco Trungelliti and Gianluca Mager will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Barcelona Open Banc Sabadell for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Sunday at 12:15 pm on PISTA ANDRES GIMENO. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Gianluca Mager who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Gianluca Mager is the pick to win this match.
Gianluca Mager -> 1.75
Marco Trungelliti -> 2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Marco Trungelliti vs. Gianluca Mager
There is no head to head record between Marco Trungelliti and Gianluca Mager since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Marco Trungelliti
19 - 8win/loss
169
112
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 22-9 | 5-4 | 16-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 38-29 | 7-8 | 30-19 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2022 | 23-16 | 4-3 | 16-11 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 27-16 | 4-2 | 20-11 | 0-2 | 3-1 | 0-0 |
2020 | 11-17 | 5-2 | 6-11 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 197, Marco reached the qualifications after beating Pablo Llamas Ruiz 6-3 5-7 6-4.
In the qualifications, The Argentine defeated Llamas Ruiz (6-3 5-7 6-4). During the match, Trungelliti scored 103 points vs Llamas Ruiz’s 90. Marco was exceptionally aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Regarding the service games, Trungelliti fired 5 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Marco Trungelliti lost the serve 5 times and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Trungelliti put 52% of his first serves in, winning 75% (36/48) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (19/44) on the 2nd serve. Trungelliti broke Llamas Ruiz 6 times after converting 86% of his break points (6/7).
Trungelliti has positive win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 58% of his matches (284-205). 13-3 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Trungelliti has an aggregate 194-118 match record in the last years on clay.
His best result of the season was winning the title the Kigali 2 Challenger where he beat Clement Tabur in the final 6-4 6-2.
Trungelliti has an overall 19-8 win-loss record in 2024, 13-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Barcelona
Gianluca Mager
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 21-9 | 0-0 | 21-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 18-20 | 3-5 | 15-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 20-28 | 2-5 | 17-21 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 33-28 | 4-7 | 22-15 | 6-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
2020 | 12-15 | 1-4 | 10-10 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 252, Gianluca reached the qualifications after beating Bernabe Zapata Miralles 6-2 6-1.
In the qualifications, The Italian had a good straight sets win against Zapata Miralles (6-2 6-1). During the match Mager scored 54 points vs Zapata Miralles’s 28. Gianluca was extremely aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about serving, Mager struck 8 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Gianluca Mager conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 2 break points. Furthermore, Mager put 55% of his first serves in, winning 95% (21/22) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (9/18) on the 2nd serve. Mager broke Zapata Miralles 5 times after converting 71% of his break points (5/7).
His best result of the year was winning the title the Punta Del Este Challenger where he overcame Thiago Agustin Tirante in the final 6-7(5) 6-2 6-0.
The Italian has a composed 21-8 win-loss record in 2024, 21-8 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Barcelona
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Trungelliti | Mager |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 3 | 2 |
Tot Games | 31 | 15 |
Pts | 103-90 | 54-28 |
Total Points | 193 | 82 |
Winners | 36 | 21 |
%Winners | 35% | 39% |
Both Trungelliti and Mager played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Marco Trungelliti dropped 1 set while Gianluca Mager hasn’t lost a set so far. Trungelliti has played 1 set more than Mager (3 vs 2). Therefore, Trungelliti played 16 games more than Mager. Trungelliti scored 36 winners (35% of the total points). On the other side, Gianluca recorded 21 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Trungelliti | Mager |
---|---|---|
Aces | 5 | 8 |
Avg per match | 5 | 8 |
1st in | 48/92 | 22/40 |
%1st in | 52% | 55% |
1st pts | 36/48 | 21/22 |
%1st pts | 75% | 95% |
2nd pts | 19/44 | 9/18 |
%2nd pts | 43% | 50% |
Trungelliti struck 5 aces . Mager made 8 aces . Trungelliti won 75% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Mager won 95% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Trungelliti | Mager |
---|---|---|
Won | 6 | 5 |
Converted | 6/7 | 5/7 |
% Converted | 86% | 71% |
Conceded | 12 | 2 |
Saved | 7 | 2 |
% Saved | 58% | 100% |
Times Broken | 5 | 0 |
Marco broke his opponent 6 times with a 86% conversion rate. The Argentine lost his serve 5 times and he saved 58% of the break points that he conceded. Mager broke his opponent 5 times with a 71% conversion rate. Gianluca was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
Trungelliti | |||
Q1 Llamas |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
pts | 103-90 | 103-90 | |
Total points | 193 | 193 | |
Winners | 36 | 36 | |
%Winners | 35% | 35% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 5 | 5 | |
Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
1st in | 48/92 | 48/92 | |
% 1st in | 52% | 52% | |
1st pts | 36/48 | 36/48 | |
% 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
2nd pts | 19/44 | 19/44 | |
% 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 6 | 6 | |
Converted | 6/7 | 6/7 | |
Converted % | 86% | 86% | |
Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
Saved | 7/12 | 7 | |
Saved % | 58% | 58% | |
Times Broken | 5 | 5 |
Mager | |||
Q1 Zapata Miralles |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 15 | 15 | |
pts | 54-28 | 54-28 | |
Total points | 82 | 82 | |
Winners | 21 | 21 | |
%Winners | 39% | 39% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 8 | 8 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
1st in | 22/40 | 22/40 | |
% 1st in | 55% | 55% | |
1st pts | 21/22 | 21/22 | |
% 1st pts | 95% | 95% | |
2nd pts | 9/18 | 9/18 | |
% 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/7 | 5/7 | |
Converted % | 71% | 71% | |
Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Head 2 Head
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel EvansEvans – Brandon NakashimaNakashima (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Denis YevseyevYevseyev – Benjamin HassanHassan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Gianluca MagerMager – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Albert Ramos-VinolasRamos-Vinolas (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roman SafiullinSafiullin – Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel AltmaierAltmaier – Alexei PopyrinPopyrin (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar – Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nick HardtHardt – Hugo DellienDellien (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Pavel KotovKotov – Sebastian OfnerOfner (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic – Oriol Roca BatallaRoca Batalla (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – Andrea VavassoriVavassori (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Flavio CobolliCobolli – Rafael NadalNadal (0-0) – H2H and prediction