Astra Sharma and Gabriela Lee will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Credit One Charleston Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Sunday at 1:00 pm on Court 3. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Astra Sharma who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Astra Sharma is the pick to win this match.
Astra Sharma -> 1.42
Gabriela Lee -> 2.73
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Astra Sharma vs. Gabriela Lee
This will be the 2nd time that Astra Sharma and Gabriela Lee play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Sharma (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they competed against each other, Sharma won 6-4 6-4 in the quarter in Targu Jiu back in 2017.
Astra Sharma
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 16-28 | 4-8 | 9-17 | 3-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-20 | 16-8 | 25-11 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 19-26 | 11-18 | 4-5 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 25-21 | 11-9 | 11-7 | 1-2 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 9-12 | 5-8 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 135, Astra reached the qualifications after defeating Jessie Aney 6-0 6-2.
In the qualifications, Sharma had a good straight sets win against Aney (6-0 6-2). During the match, Sharma scored 53 points vs Aney’s 20. Astra was exceptionally aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Talking about the service games, Sharma scored just 1 ace throughout the encounter and she was very steady in conceding no double faults. Astra Sharma was quite effective on serve to win 87% (20/23) of her 1st serve and 82% (9/11) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Sharma broke Aney 5 times after converting 63% of her break points (5/8).
Sharma has a solid record in the last 9 years having won 60% of her matches (199-132). 1-1 on clay in 2024. Talking about her performance on the same surface of this tournament, Sharma has an aggregate81-40 match record in the last 9 years on clay.
Sharma has a compiled 2-3 win-loss record in 2024, 1-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Charleston
Gabriela Lee
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 29-21 | 3-4 | 24-13 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 25-24 | 6-9 | 19-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-28 | 1-5 | 19-15 | 0-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 15-20 | 6-8 | 9-11 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 22-15 | 6-5 | 10-7 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 313, Gabriela got to the qualifications after defeating Mai Hontama 5-7 6-3 6-4.
In the qualifications against Hontama, Gabriela recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-3 6-4). During the match Talaba scored 108 points vs Hontama’s 94. Gabriela was pretty aggressive to blast 33 winners.
About the serving games, Talaba fired 3 aces and she committed only 5 double faults. Gabriela Lee lost the serve 6 times and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Talaba put 54% of her first serves in, winning 66% (33/50) of the points behind her 1st serve and 45% (19/42) on the 2nd serve. Gabriela broke Hontama 7 times after converting 58% of her break points (7/12).
Gabriela’s best result of the season was reaching the final in the W75+H Vero Beach.
Talaba has a compiled 10-5 win-loss record in 2024, 9-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Charleston
Previously, her best result was reaching the 1st round in 2021 and 2022. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Sharma | Talaba |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 14 | 31 |
| Pts | 53-20 | 108-94 |
| Total Points | 73 | 202 |
| Winners | 20 | 33 |
| %Winners | 38% | 31% |
Both Sharma and Talaba played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Gabriela Lee dropped 1 set while Astra Sharma hasn’t conceded a set so far. Sharma has played 1 set(s) less than Talaba (2 vs 3). Therefore, Sharma played 17 games less than Talaba. Sharma scored 20 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The Romanian blasted 33 winners (31%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Sharma | Talaba |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 3 |
| 1st in | 23/34 | 50/92 |
| %1st in | 68% | 54% |
| 1st pts | 20/23 | 33/50 |
| %1st pts | 87% | 66% |
| 2nd pts | 9/11 | 19/42 |
| %2nd pts | 82% | 45% |
Sharma made 1 ace . Talaba also fired 3 aces . Sharma won 87% points behind her first serve. She very solid her second serve to win 82% of the points. On the other side, Talaba won 66% of the points behind her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 45% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Sharma | Talaba |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 7 |
| Converted | 5/8 | 7/12 |
| % Converted | 63% | 58% |
| Conceded | 0 | 8 |
| Saved | 0 | 2 |
| % Saved | 0% | 25% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 6 |
Astra broke her opponent 5 times with a 63% conversion rate. Sharma was rock solid on her serve as she has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. Gabriela broke her opponent 7 times with a 58% conversion rate. The Romanian conceded her serve 6 times and she saved 25% of the break points that she conceded.
| Sharma | |||
| Q1 Aney |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
| pts | 53-20 | 53-20 | |
| Total points | 73 | 73 | |
| Winners | 20 | 20 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 23/34 | 23/34 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 20/23 | 20/23 | |
| % 1st pts | 87% | 87% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/11 | 9/11 | |
| % 2nd pts | 82% | 82% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/8 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 63% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Talaba | |||
| Q1 Hontama |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-7 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 108-94 | 108-94 | |
| Total points | 202 | 202 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 31% | 31% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 50/92 | 50/92 | |
| % 1st in | 54% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 33/50 | 33/50 | |
| % 1st pts | 66% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/42 | 19/42 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/12 | 7/12 | |
| Converted % | 58% | 58% | |
| Conceded | 8 | 8 | |
| Saved | 2/8 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 25% | 25% | |
| Times Broken | 6 | 6 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWLWLLW
WWWLWLLWWL Tennis Scores in Charleston
- Borna GojoGojo – Ronnie SchneiderSchneider (6-1 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jeff WolfWolf – Karue SellSell (6-3 4-6 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Ruan RoelofseRoelofse (7-5 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Mikael TorpegaardTorpegaard – Thomas FancuttFancutt (6-3 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Varvara GrachevaVarvara – Usue Maitane ArconadaUsue (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Daria SavilleDaria – Heather WatsonHeather (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Varvara GrachevaGracheva – Usue Maitane ArconadaMaitane Arconada (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Gabriela TalabaTalaba – Astra SharmaSharma (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Claire LiuLiu – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daria GavrilovaGavrilova – Heather WatsonWatson (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mccartney KesslerKessler – Sachia VickeryVickery (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Katie VolynetsVolynets – Ann LiLi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alize CornetCornet – Amanda AnisimovaAnisimova (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Magda LinetteLinette – Petra MarticMartic (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Elisabetta CocciarettoCocciaretto – Ana BogdanBogdan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Taylor TownsendTownsend – Sofia KeninKenin (1-3) – H2H and prediction
- Caroline DolehideDolehide – Kayla DayDay (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Arina RodionovaRodionova – Yulia PutintsevaPutintseva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mayar SherifSherif – Viktoriya TomovaTomova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Magdalena FrechFrech – Sloane StephensStephens (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Danielle Rose CollinsRose Collins – Paula Badosa GibertBadosa Gibert (1-0) – H2H and prediction
