Jannik Sinner and Christopher O Connell will clash against each other in the 4th round of the Miami Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Tuesday at 4:00 pm on GRANDSTAND. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Jannik Sinner who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Jannik Sinner is the pick to win this match.
Jannik Sinner -> 1.05
Christopher O Connell -> 10
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Jannik Sinner vs. Christopher O Connell
This will be the 2nd time that Jannik Sinner and Christopher O Connell fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for O (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they competed against each other, O won 7-6(7) 6-4 in the 2nd round in Atlanta back in 2021.
Highlights Christopher O Connell vs Jannik Sinner – Atlanta 29-July-2021
Jannik Sinner
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 26-2 | 17-1 | 4-1 | 5-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 64-15 | 28-7 | 8-3 | 20-2 | 8-3 | 0-0 |
2022 | 47-16 | 21-6 | 15-4 | 7-4 | 4-2 | 0-0 |
2021 | 49-22 | 22-8 | 10-6 | 17-6 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
2020 | 20-14 | 2-6 | 7-3 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 3 (career-high), Sinner reached the 4th round after beating Andrea Vavassori 6-3 6-4 and Tallon Griekspoor 5-7 7-5 6-1.
In the 3rd round against Griekspoor, The Italian recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 7-5 6-1). During the match, Sinner scored 106 points vs Griekspoor’s 81. The Italian was very aggressive to blast 46 winners.
Talking about the service games, Sinner managed to score 15 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Jannik Sinner was exceptionally effective on serve to win 90% (46/51) of his 1st serve and 67% (16/24) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Italian broke Griekspoor 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Sinner has surrendered 1 set in this competition to win 57% of the points he played.
Sinner has a fantastic match record in the last 7 years having won 72% of his matches (291-114). 13-1 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Sinner has an aggregate111-42 match record in the last 7 years on hard.
His best result of the year was winning the title at the Australian Open where he defeated Daniil Medvedev in the final 3-6 3-6 6-4 6-4 6-3 and in Rotterdam where he overcame Alex De Minaur in the final 7-5 6-4.
Sinner has an aggregate 18-1 win-loss record in 2024, 13-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Miami
Christopher O Connell
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 11-11 | 9-8 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 38-34 | 19-18 | 11-9 | 4-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 |
2022 | 50-25 | 30-16 | 12-5 | 3-1 | 5-3 | 0-0 |
2021 | 22-16 | 14-9 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
2020 | 12-12 | 4-5 | 4-3 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 66, O reached the 4th round after defeating Vit Kopriva 6-2 6-4, Frances Tiafoe 7-5 7-65 and Martin Damm 7-65 7-65.
In the 3rd round, The Australian had a good straight sets win against Damm (7-65 7-65). During the match O scored 85 points vs Damm’s 80. Christopher was very aggressive to blast 48 winners.
Talking about serving, O recorded 13 aces and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Christopher O Connell lost the serve once and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, O put 65% of his first serves in, winning 81% (48/59) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (16/32) on the 2nd serve. O was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Damm once.
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Australian hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
O has a composed 9-7 win-loss record in 2024, 9-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Miami
Previously, his best result was reaching the 1st round in 2021 and 2023. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Sinner | O |
---|---|---|
Match played | 2 | 3 |
Tot Set | 5 | 6 |
Tot Games | 50 | 69 |
Pts | 164-126 | 224-192 |
Total Points | 290 | 416 |
Winners | 79 | 122 |
%Winners | 48% | 54% |
Sinner played 2 matches while O competed in 3 matches. At the moment, Jannik Sinner lost 1 set while Christopher O Connell hasn’t dropped a set so far. Sinner has played 1 set(s) less than O (5 vs 6). Therefore, Sinner played 19 games less than O. Sinner scored 79 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, The Australian recorded 122 winners (54%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Sinner | O |
---|---|---|
Aces | 18 | 40 |
Avg per match | 9 | 13.3 |
1st in | 87/127 | 153/220 |
%1st in | 69% | 70% |
1st pts | 79/87 | 122/153 |
%1st pts | 91% | 80% |
2nd pts | 23/40 | 37/67 |
%2nd pts | 58% | 55% |
Sinner made 18 aces (9 per match). O managed to score 40 aces (13.3 per match). Sinner won 91% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 58% of the points. On the other side, O won 80% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Sinner | O |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 6 |
Converted | 5/13 | 6/8 |
% Converted | 38% | 75% |
Conceded | 2 | 19 |
Saved | 1 | 17 |
% Saved | 50% | 89% |
Times Broken | 1 | 2 |
Jannik broke his opponents 5 times with a 38% conversion rate. Jannik dropped his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Christopher broke his opponents 6 times with a 75% conversion rate. The Australian conceded his serve twice and he saved 89% of the break points that he conceded.
Sinner | ||||
R2 Vavassori |
R3 Griekspoor |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-3 6-4 | 5-7 7-5 6-1 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
Tot Games | 19 | 31 | 50 | |
pts | 58-45 | 106-81 | 164-126 | |
Total points | 103 | 187 | 290 | |
Winners | 33 | 46 | 79 | |
%Winners | 57% | 43% | 48% | |
SERVE | ||||
Aces | 3 | 15 | 18 | |
Double Faults | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
1st in | 36/52 | 51/75 | 87/127 | |
% 1st in | 69% | 68% | 69% | |
1st pts | 33/36 | 46/51 | 79/87 | |
% 1st pts | 92% | 90% | 91% | |
2nd pts | 7/16 | 16/24 | 23/40 | |
% 2nd pts | 44% | 67% | 58% | |
Breaks | ||||
Won | 2 | 3 | 5 | |
Converted | 2/4 | 3/9 | 5/13 | |
Converted % | 50% | 33% | 38% | |
Conceded | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 1/2 | 1 | |
Saved % | – | 50% | 25% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 |
O | |||||
R1 Kopriva |
R2 Tiafoe |
R3 Damm |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-2 6-4 | 7-5 7-65 | 7-65 7-65 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 18 | 25 | 26 | 69 | |
pts | 59-41 | 80-71 | 85-80 | 224-192 | |
Total points | 100 | 151 | 165 | 416 | |
Winners | 30 | 44 | 48 | 122 | |
%Winners | 51% | 55% | 56% | 54% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 10 | 17 | 13 | 40 | |
Double Faults | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
1st in | 36/55 | 58/74 | 59/91 | 153/220 | |
% 1st in | 65% | 78% | 65% | 70% | |
1st pts | 30/36 | 44/58 | 48/59 | 122/153 | |
% 1st pts | 83% | 76% | 81% | 80% | |
2nd pts | 11/19 | 10/16 | 16/32 | 37/67 | |
% 2nd pts | 58% | 63% | 50% | 55% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 | |
Converted | 3/4 | 2/3 | 1/1 | 6/8 | |
Converted % | 75% | 67% | 100% | 75% | |
Conceded | 4 | 5 | 10 | 19 | |
Saved | 4/4 | 4/5 | 9/10 | 17 | |
Saved % | 100% | 80% | 90% | 135% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Miami
- Grigor DimitrovDimitrov – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Alexander ZverevZverev – Christopher EubanksEubanks (7-64 6-3) – See score progression
- Karen KhachanovKhachanov – Francisco CerundoloCerundolo (6-1 5-7 7-65) – See score progression
- Carlos AlcarazAlcaraz – Gael MonfilsMonfils (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Fabian MarozsanMarozsan – Alexei PopyrinPopyrin (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Lorenzo MusettiMusetti – Ben SheltonShelton (6-4 7-65) – See score progression
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Jan-Lennard StruffStruff (7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Hubert HurkaczHurkacz – Sebastian KordaKorda (7-65 6-75 6-3) – See score progression
- Tomas MachacMachac – Andy MurrayMurray (5-7 7-5 7-65) – See score progression
- Jannik SinnerSinner – Tallon GriekspoorGriekspoor (5-7 7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Ugo HumbertHumbert (3-6 6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Daniil MedvedevMedvedev – Cameron NorrieNorrie (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Nicolas JarryJarry – Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild (6-71 7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Casper RuudRuud – Alejandro Davidovich FokinaDavidovich Fokina (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Matteo ArnaldiArnaldi – Denis ShapovalovShapovalov (6-3 7-67) – See score progression
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Martin DammDamm (7-65 7-65) – See score progression
- Carlos AlcarazAlcaraz – Gael MonfilsMonfils (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Lorenzo MusettiMusetti – Ben SheltonShelton (6-4 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Grigor DimitrovDimitrov – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (6-1 6-0) – See score progression
- Hubert HurkaczHurkacz – Sebastian KordaKorda (7-6(5) 6-7(5) 6-3) – See score progression
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Jan-Lennard StruffStruff (7-6(3) 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Grigor DimitrovDimitrov – Hubert HurkaczHurkacz (4-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander ZverevZverev – Karen KhachanovKhachanov (3-2) – H2H and prediction
- Christopher O ConnellO Connell – Jannik SinnerSinner (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Casper RuudRuud – Nicolas JarryJarry (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Dominik KoepferKoepfer – Daniil MedvedevMedvedev (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Alex De MinaurDe Minaur – Fabian MarozsanMarozsan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas MachacMachac – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos Alcaraz GarfiaAlcaraz Garfia – Lorenzo MusettiMusetti (3-1) – H2H and prediction