Roberto Cid Subervi and Stefan Kozlov will fight against each other in the qualifications of the San Luis Potosi Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 12:30 pm on CANCHA 3. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Stefan Kozlov who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Stefan Kozlov is the pick to win this match.
Stefan Kozlov -> 1.75
Roberto Cid Subervi -> 2
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Roberto Cid Subervi vs. Stefan Kozlov
This will be the 2nd time that Roberto Cid Subervi and Stefan Kozlov square off. The head to head is 1-0 for Cid (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on clay.
The last time that they competed against each other, Cid won 7-6(1) 5-7 6-3 in the semifinal in the Ann Arbor Challenger back in 2020.
Roberto Cid Subervi
17 - 6win/loss
393
211
LWWWWWWWWW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 45-21 | 21-6 | 23-12 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-18 | 22-9 | 16-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-8 | 14-5 | 7-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-30 | 6-12 | 4-15 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-15 | 0-3 | 6-8 | 6-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 432, Cid reached the qualifications after defeating Keegan Smith 6-4 6-2.
In the qualifications, The Dominican had a good straight sets win against Smith (6-4 6-2). During the match, Cid scored 64 points vs Smith’s 55. The Dominican was exceptionally aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about the service games, Cid scored just 1 ace during the encounter and he committed only 5 double faults. Roberto Cid Subervi conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 2 break points. Furthermore, Cid put 71% of his first serves in, winning 78% (35/45) of the points behind his 1st serve and 39% (7/18) on the 2nd serve. Cid broke Smith 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Cid has good record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (234-164). 8-3 on clay in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Cid has an aggregate 117-82 record in the last years on clay.
The Dominican’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25 Wesley Chapel.
Roberto has an aggregate 16-6 win-loss record in 2024, 8-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the San Luis Potosi Challenger
Stefan Kozlov
17 - 8win/loss
355
103
LWLWWLWWLW | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 37-19 | 16-9 | 17-8 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 6-12 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 21-34 | 14-18 | 0-5 | 4-5 | 3-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 41-15 | 20-12 | 5-2 | 16-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 13-13 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 653, Kozlov got to the qualifications after defeating Evan Zhu 6-0 6-1.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Zhu (6-0 6-1). During the match Kozlov scored 57 points vs Zhu’s 26. Kozlov was pretty aggressive to blast 21 winners.
Talking about serving, Kozlov couldn’t to score even 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 6 double faults. Stefan Kozlov lost the serve once and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Kozlov put 62% of his first serves in, winning 75% (21/28) of the points behind his 1st serve and 41% (7/17) on the 2nd serve. Stefan broke Zhu 7 times after converting 64% of his break points (7/11).
The American’s best result of the current year was getting to the semifinal in the Kigali 1 Challenger.
Kozlov has a compiled 17-7 win-loss record in 2024, 10-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Cid | Kozlov |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 18 | 13 |
| Pts | 64-55 | 57-26 |
| Total Points | 119 | 83 |
| Winners | 35 | 21 |
| %Winners | 55% | 37% |
Both Cid and Kozlov played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Cid and Kozlov have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Cid played 5 games more than Kozlov. Cid scored 35 winners (55% of the total points). On the other side, The American struck 21 winners (37%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Cid | Kozlov |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 0 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 0 |
| 1st in | 45/63 | 28/45 |
| %1st in | 71% | 62% |
| 1st pts | 35/45 | 21/28 |
| %1st pts | 78% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 7/18 | 7/17 |
| %2nd pts | 39% | 41% |
Cid blasted 1 ace . Kozlov didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Cid won 78% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 39% of the points. On the other side, Kozlov won 75% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 41% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Cid | Kozlov |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 7 |
| Converted | 3/4 | 7/11 |
| % Converted | 75% | 64% |
| Conceded | 2 | 5 |
| Saved | 2 | 4 |
| % Saved | 100% | 80% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 |
Roberto broke his opponent 3 times with a 75% conversion rate. Cid extremely effective on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points. Kozlov broke his opponent 7 times with a 64% conversion rate. The American conceded his serve once and he saved 80% of the break points that he conceded.
| Cid | |||
| Q1 Smith |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 18 | 18 | |
| pts | 64-55 | 64-55 | |
| Total points | 119 | 119 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 55% | 55% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 5 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 45/63 | 45/63 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 35/45 | 35/45 | |
| % 1st pts | 78% | 78% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/18 | 7/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 39% | 39% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/4 | 3/4 | |
| Converted % | 75% | 75% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Kozlov | |||
| Q1 Zhu |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-0 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 13 | 13 | |
| pts | 57-26 | 57-26 | |
| Total points | 83 | 83 | |
| Winners | 21 | 21 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 28/45 | 28/45 | |
| % 1st in | 62% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 21/28 | 21/28 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/17 | 7/17 | |
| % 2nd pts | 41% | 41% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/11 | 7/11 | |
| Converted % | 64% | 64% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 4/5 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 80% | 80% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWWWWWW
LWLWWLWWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Roberto CidCid – Stefan KozlovKozlov (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marc PolmansPolmans – Murkel Alejandro Dellien VelascoAlejandro Dellien Velasco (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omar JasikaJasika – Vasek PospisilPospisil (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich – Denis KudlaKudla (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Christian LangmoLangmo – Gabi Adrian BoitanAdrian Boitan (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Niki Kaliyanda PoonachaKaliyanda Poonacha – Andres AndradeAndrade (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Bernard TomicTomic (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Louis WesselsWessels – Nicolas MejiaMejia (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexis GalarneauGalarneau – Antoine BellierBellier (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Agustin TiranteAgustin Tirante – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Elmar EjupovicEjupovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matias SotoSoto – Facundo MenaMena (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate – Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera (0-0) – H2H and prediction
