Sumit Nagal and Chak Lam Coleman Wong will clash against each other in the qualifications of the Miami Open for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 11:00 am on COURT 6. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sumit Nagal who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Sumit Nagal is the pick to win this match.
Sumit Nagal -> 1.26
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 3.6
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Sumit Nagal vs. Chak Lam Coleman Wong
This will be the 2nd time that Sumit Nagal and Chak Lam Coleman Wong play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Nagal (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they fought against each other, Nagal won 6-2 7-5 in the 2nd round in the Bengaluru Challenger back in February 2024.
Sumit Nagal
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 32-29 | 15-13 | 16-11 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-29 | 9-8 | 32-17 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-18 | 0-1 | 16-17 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-26 | 1-4 | 22-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-14 | 2-4 | 5-5 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 97 (career-high), Nagal got to the qualifications after beating Gabriel Diallo 7-63 6-2.
In the qualifications, Sumit had a good straight sets win against Diallo (7-63 6-2). During the match, Nagal scored 80 points vs Diallo’s 65. Nagal was extremely aggressive to blast 38 winners.
Regarding the service games, Nagal scored 3 aces and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults. Sumit Nagal conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 2 break points. Furthermore, Nagal put 70% of his first serves in, winning 83% (38/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (10/20) on the 2nd serve. Nagal broke Diallo twice after converting 50% of his break points (2/4).
Nagal has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (305-196). 15-7 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Nagal has a compiled 88-62 record in the last years on hard.
His best result of the current season was conquering the title the Chennai Challenger where he beat Luca Nardi in the final 6-1 6-4.
Nagal has a compiled 15-7 win-loss record in 2024, 15-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Miami
The Indian has never competed in this tournament before.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 41-36 | 39-26 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 212 (career-high), Lam Coleman Wong reached the qualifications after defeating Hugo Gaston 6-2 3-6 6-2.
In the qualifications, The defeated Gaston (6-2 3-6 6-2). During the match Lam Coleman Wong scored 85 points vs Gaston’s 64. Chak was pretty aggressive to blast 34 winners.
About the serving games, Lam Coleman Wong blasted 10 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Chak Lam Coleman Wong lost the serve twice and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Lam Coleman Wong put 57% of his first serves in, winning 83% (34/41) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (15/31) on the 2nd serve. The broke Gaston 5 times after converting 56% of his break points (5/9).
Chak’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in the New Delhi Challenger.
Chak has a compiled 6-6 win-loss record in 2024, 6-5 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Nagal | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 21 | 25 |
| Pts | 80-65 | 85-64 |
| Total Points | 145 | 149 |
| Winners | 38 | 34 |
| %Winners | 48% | 40% |
Both Nagal and Lam Coleman Wong played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Chak Lam Coleman Wong surrendered 1 set while Sumit Nagal hasn’t lost a set so far. Nagal has played 1 set(s) less than Lam Coleman Wong (2 vs 3). Therefore, Nagal played 4 games less than Lam Coleman Wong. Sumit scored 38 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, The fired 34 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Nagal | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 10 |
| 1st in | 46/66 | 41/72 |
| %1st in | 70% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 38/46 | 34/41 |
| %1st pts | 83% | 83% |
| 2nd pts | 10/20 | 15/31 |
| %2nd pts | 50% | 48% |
Nagal fired 3 aces . Lam Coleman Wong bagged 10 aces . Nagal won 83% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 50% of the points. On the other side, Lam Coleman Wong won 83% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Nagal | Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 5 |
| Converted | 2/4 | 5/9 |
| % Converted | 50% | 56% |
| Conceded | 2 | 5 |
| Saved | 2 | 3 |
| % Saved | 100% | 60% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 2 |
Sumit broke his opponent twice with a 50% conversion rate. Sumit very solid his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 2 break points. Lam Coleman Wong broke his opponent 5 times with a 56% conversion rate. Chak conceded his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded.
| Nagal | |||
| Q1 Diallo |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-63 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | |
| pts | 80-65 | 80-65 | |
| Total points | 145 | 145 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 46/66 | 46/66 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 38/46 | 38/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/20 | 10/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/4 | 2/4 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Lam Coleman Wong | |||
| Q1 Gaston |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 3-6 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 85-64 | 85-64 | |
| Total points | 149 | 149 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 10 | 10 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 41/72 | 41/72 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 34/41 | 34/41 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/31 | 15/31 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 5/9 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 5 | 5 | |
| Saved | 3/5 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 60% | 60% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWLLLLL
LWLWWLLWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Andy MurrayMurray – Matteo BerrettiniBerrettini (2-3) – H2H and prediction
- Dusan LajovicLajovic – Gael MonfilsMonfils (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Marcos GironGiron – Dominik KoepferKoepfer (2-2) – H2H and prediction
- Jordan ThompsonThompson – Nuno BorgesBorges (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Yoshihito NishiokaNishioka – Emilio NavaNava (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel Elahi GalanElahi Galan – Alexander ShevchenkoShevchenko (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero – Adam WaltonWalton (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Kei NishikoriNishikori (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Soon-Woo KwonKwon (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Arthur RinderknechRinderknech – Diego Sebastian SchwartzmanSebastian Schwartzman (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Max PurcellPurcell – Marton FucsovicsFucsovics (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar VukicVukic – Roberto Carballes BaenaCarballes Baena (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo SonegoSonego – Daniel EvansEvans (3-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexei PopyrinPopyrin – Facundo Diaz AcostaDiaz Acosta (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Andrea VavassoriVavassori (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thiago Seyboth WildSeyboth Wild – Hugo GrenierGrenier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Yannick HanfmannHanfmann (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Zizou BergsBergs (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Pavel KotovKotov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jeff WolfWolf – Vit KoprivaKopriva (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Otto VirtanenVirtanen – Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon NakashimaNakashima – Terence AtmaneAtmane (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Rinky HijikataHijikata – Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tomas MachacMachac – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Harold MayotMayot – David GoffinGoffin (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jack DraperDraper – Taro DanielDaniel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
