Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Yuta Shimizu will play each other in the semifinal of the New Delhi Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Saturday at 1:00 pm on CENTER COURT. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Yuta Shimizu who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Yuta Shimizu is the pick to win this match.
Yuta Shimizu -> 1.83
Chak Lam Coleman Wong -> 1.89
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs. Yuta Shimizu
This will be the 2nd time that Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Yuta Shimizu clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Shimizu (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they locked horns, Shimizu won 7-6(7) 6-7(1) 7-6(4) in the quarter in the Yokohama Challenger back in 2023.
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 40-34 | 38-24 | 0-2 | 2-4 | 0-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 53-27 | 42-19 | 9-7 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 24-19 | 20-12 | 3-5 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 11-7 | 5-4 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-4 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 241, Lam Coleman Wong got to the semifinal after beating Mukund Sasikumar 6-4 4-6 7-5, Valentin Vacherot w/o and Tristan Schoolkate 7-610 6-3.
In the quarter, Lam Coleman Wong had a good straight sets win against Schoolkate (7-610 6-3). During the match, Lam Coleman Wong scored 74 points vs Schoolkate’s 59. The was quite aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about the service games, Lam Coleman Wong bagged 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Chak Lam Coleman Wong was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 79% (26/33) of his 1st serve and 69% (22/32) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Lam Coleman Wong was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Schoolkate twice.
Overall Performance in this tournament
Lam Coleman Wong has dropped 1 set in this tournament to win 54% of the points he played.
Lam Coleman Wong has a winning record in the last 6 years having won 58% of his matches (95-68). 4-4 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Lam Coleman Wong has a composed74-50 match record in the last 6 years on hard.
Chak has a composed 4-4 win-loss record in 2024, 4-4 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the New Delhi Challenger
The has never competed in this tournament before.
Yuta Shimizu
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33-28 | 29-24 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 36-24 | 35-23 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 44-23 | 36-21 | 7-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 18-12 | 12-8 | 0-0 | 5-4 | 1-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 11-1 | 6-1 | 0-0 | 5-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 243, Yuta got to the semifinal after defeating Maxime Janvier 6-3 6-1, Benjamin Bonzi 7-5 6-4 and Enrico Dalla Valle 7-5 7-5.
In the quarter, The Japanese had a good straight sets win against Dalla Valle (7-5 7-5). During the match Shimizu scored 91 points vs Dalla Valle’s 72. The Japanese was quite aggressive to blast 39 winners.
About the serving games, Shimizu recorded 2 aces and he committed only 8 double faults. Yuta Shimizu lost the serve 3 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Shimizu put 64% of his first serves in, winning 80% (39/49) of the points behind his 1st serve and 32% (9/28) on the 2nd serve. Yuta broke Dalla Valle 5 times after converting 36% of his break points (5/14).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Japanese hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 57% of the points he played.
Yuta has an overall 4-3 win-loss record in 2024, 4-3 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Lam Coleman Wong | Shimizu |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 54 | 62 |
| Pts | 195-168 | 220-166 |
| Total Points | 363 | 386 |
| Winners | 65 | 77 |
| %Winners | 33% | 35% |
Lam Coleman Wong played 2 matches while Shimizu competed in 3 matches. At the moment, Chak Lam Coleman Wong surrendered 1 set while Yuta Shimizu hasn’t lost a set so far. Lam Coleman Wong has played 1 set(s) less than Shimizu (5 vs 6). Therefore, Lam Coleman Wong played 8 games less than Shimizu. Chak scored 65 winners (33% of the total points). On the other side, The Japanese blasted 77 winners (35%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Lam Coleman Wong | Shimizu |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 16 | 3 |
| Avg per match | 8 | 1 |
| 1st in | 85/172 | 108/186 |
| %1st in | 49% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 65/85 | 77/108 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 71% |
| 2nd pts | 47/87 | 39/78 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 50% |
Lam Coleman Wong struck 16 aces (8 per match). Shimizu bagged 3 aces (1 per match). Lam Coleman Wong won 76% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Shimizu won 71% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 50% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Lam Coleman Wong | Shimizu |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 16 |
| Converted | 7/17 | 16/29 |
| % Converted | 41% | 55% |
| Conceded | 13 | 17 |
| Saved | 8 | 9 |
| % Saved | 62% | 53% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 8 |
Chak broke his opponents 7 times with a 41% conversion rate. Chak surrendered his serve 5 times and he saved 62% of the break points that he conceded. Shimizu broke his opponents 16 times with a 55% conversion rate. The Japanese conceded his serve 8 times and he saved 53% of the break points that he conceded.
| Lam Coleman Wong | |||||
| R1 Kumar Mukund |
R2 Vacherot |
1/4 Schoolkate |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 4-6 7-5 | w/o | 7-610 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | – | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 32 | – | 22 | 54 | |
| pts | 121-109 | – | 74-59 | 195-168 | |
| Total points | 230 | – | 133 | 363 | |
| Winners | 39 | – | 26 | 65 | |
| %Winners | 32% | – | 35% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 13 | – | 3 | 16 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | – | 1 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 52/107 | – | 33/65 | 85/172 | |
| % 1st in | 49% | – | 51% | 49% | |
| 1st pts | 39/52 | – | 26/33 | 65/85 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | – | 79% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 25/55 | – | 22/32 | 47/87 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | – | 69% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | – | 2 | 7 | |
| Converted | 5/15 | – | 2/2 | 7/17 | |
| Converted % | 33% | – | 100% | 41% | |
| Conceded | 12 | – | 1 | 13 | |
| Saved | 8/12 | – | 0/1 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 67% | – | 0% | 22% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | – | 1 | 5 | |
| Shimizu | |||||
| R1 Janvier |
R2 Bonzi |
1/4 Dalla Valle |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | 7-5 6-4 | 7-5 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 22 | 24 | 62 | |
| pts | 55-32 | 74-62 | 91-72 | 220-166 | |
| Total points | 87 | 136 | 163 | 386 | |
| Winners | 14 | 24 | 39 | 77 | |
| %Winners | 25% | 32% | 43% | 35% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 4 | 8 | 14 | |
| 1st in | 19/40 | 40/69 | 49/77 | 108/186 | |
| % 1st in | 48% | 58% | 64% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 14/19 | 24/40 | 39/49 | 77/108 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 60% | 80% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/21 | 14/29 | 9/28 | 39/78 | |
| % 2nd pts | 76% | 48% | 32% | 50% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 6 | 5 | 16 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 6/7 | 5/14 | 16/29 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 86% | 36% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 9 | 7 | 17 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 5/9 | 4/7 | 9 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 56% | 57% | 38% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 | 3 | 8 | |
Head 2 Head
WWLLWLWLWW
WLLWWWLWWW Tennis Scores in New Delhi Challenger
- Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux – Philip SekulicSekulic (7-63 6-2) – See score progression
- Chak Lam Coleman WongLam Coleman Wong – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (7-610 6-3) – See score progression
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – Dalibor SvrcinaSvrcina (7-62 7-61) – See score progression
- Ray Ho/Calum PuttergillHo/Calum Puttergill – Toshihide Matsui/Kaito UesugiMatsui/Kaito Uesugi (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Constantin Bittoun Kouzmine/Maxime JanvierBittoun Kouzmine/Maxime Janvier – Arjun Kadhe/Jeevan NedunchezhiyanKadhe/Jeevan Nedunchezhiyan (7-64 6-74 10-6) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Yuta ShimizuShimizu – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Tristan BoyerBoyer – Geoffrey BlancaneauxBlancaneaux (0-0) – H2H and prediction
