Juan Pablo Paz and Kamil Majchrzak will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Kigali 1 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 10:00 am on COURT 2. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Kamil Majchrzak who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Kamil Majchrzak is the pick to win this match.
Kamil Majchrzak -> 1.148
Juan Pablo Paz -> 5
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Juan Pablo Paz vs. Kamil Majchrzak
This will be the 2nd time that Juan Pablo Paz and Kamil Majchrzak play each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Majchrzak (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on clay.
The last time that they played, Majchrzak won 6-1 6-1 in the 1st round in Argentina F20.
Juan Pablo Paz
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 38-26 | 3-1 | 35-25 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 44-33 | 1-2 | 43-31 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 46-30 | 0-1 | 46-29 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 50-32 | 0-0 | 50-32 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 28-15 | 4-5 | 24-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 589, Juan got to the 2nd round after defeating Mohamed Safwat 7-69 6-1.
In the 1st round, The Argentine had a good straight sets win against Safwat (7-69 6-1). During the match, Pablo Paz scored 67 points vs Safwat’s 56. The Argentine was pretty aggressive to blast 37 winners.
Talking about the service games, Pablo Paz blasted 4 aces and he was pretty solid in conceding no double faults. Juan Pablo Paz was exceptionally effective on serve to win 79% (37/47) of his 1st serve and 63% (12/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Juan broke Safwat twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Pablo Paz has winning win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 59% of his matches (359-252). 3-4 on clay in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Pablo Paz has an overall 350-234 win-loss record in the last years on clay.
The Argentine has an aggregate 3-4 win-loss record in 2024, 3-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Kigali 1 Challenger
Pablo Paz has never competed in this tournament before.
Kamil Majchrzak
18 - 3win/loss
120
75
LLWWWWWWLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 63-19 | 26-6 | 34-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 28-22 | 19-10 | 4-6 | 4-3 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 34-21 | 4-4 | 16-9 | 5-5 | 9-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 12-10 | 1-3 | 5-3 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
Ranked no. 652, Kamil got to the 2nd round after beating Bogdan Bobrov 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, The Pole had a good straight sets win against Bobrov (6-3 6-2). During the match Majchrzak scored 63 points vs Bobrov’s 46. Majchrzak was extremely aggressive to blast 29 winners.
About the serving games, Majchrzak bagged 7 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Kamil Majchrzak was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 83% (29/35) of his 1st serve and 55% (12/22) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Pole broke Bobrov 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
The Pole’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M15 Monastir and M25 Hammamet.
Kamil has an overall 18-3 win-loss record in 2024, 6-1 on clay (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Pablo Paz | Majchrzak |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 20 | 17 |
| Pts | 67-56 | 63-46 |
| Total Points | 123 | 109 |
| Winners | 37 | 29 |
| %Winners | 55% | 46% |
Both Pablo Paz and Majchrzak played 1 match. Both players have not conceded a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Pablo Paz and Majchrzak have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Pablo Paz played 3 games more than Majchrzak. Pablo Paz scored 37 winners (55% of the total points). On the other side, Kamil blasted 29 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Pablo Paz | Majchrzak |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 7 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 7 |
| 1st in | 47/66 | 35/57 |
| %1st in | 71% | 61% |
| 1st pts | 37/47 | 29/35 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 83% |
| 2nd pts | 12/19 | 12/22 |
| %2nd pts | 63% | 55% |
Pablo Paz scored 4 aces . Majchrzak fired 7 aces . Pablo Paz won 79% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 63% of the points. On the other side, Majchrzak won 83% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 55% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Pablo Paz | Majchrzak |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 3 |
| Converted | 2/5 | 3/7 |
| % Converted | 40% | 43% |
| Conceded | 1 | 4 |
| Saved | 1 | 4 |
| % Saved | 100% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Pablo Paz broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. Juan pretty effective on his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 1 break points. Majchrzak broke his opponent 3 times with a 43% conversion rate. The Pole was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 4 break points.
| Pablo Paz | |||
| R1 Safwat |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-69 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 67-56 | 67-56 | |
| Total points | 123 | 123 | |
| Winners | 37 | 37 | |
| %Winners | 55% | 55% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 47/66 | 47/66 | |
| % 1st in | 71% | 71% | |
| 1st pts | 37/47 | 37/47 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/19 | 12/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 1 | |
| Saved | 1/1 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Majchrzak | |||
| R1 Bobrov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 63-46 | 63-46 | |
| Total points | 109 | 109 | |
| Winners | 29 | 29 | |
| %Winners | 46% | 46% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 35/57 | 35/57 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 29/35 | 29/35 | |
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/22 | 12/22 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 55% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/7 | 3/7 | |
| Converted % | 43% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 4/4 | 4 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
WLWWLWLWWW
LLWWWWWWLL Tennis Scores in Kigali 1 Challenger
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Clement TaburTabur (6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo PazPablo Paz – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (7-69 6-1) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Bogdan BobrovBobrov (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Damien WengerWenger – Luca FantiniFantini (6-0 7-60) – See score progression
- Lucas BouquetBouquet – Benjamin LockLock (4-6 7-62 6-3) – See score progression
- Corentin DenollyDenolly – Hernan CasanovaCasanova (7-62 7-5) – See score progression
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Joshua SheehySheehy (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Calvin HemeryHemery – David PichlerPichler (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Noah SchachterSchachter (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Preston BrownBrown – S D Prajwal DevD Prajwal Dev (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Emilien VoisinVoisin – Aziz OuakaaOuakaa (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Yshai OlielOliel – Ivan DenisovDenisov (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Guy Orly IradukundaOrly Iradukunda – Jacob BrummBrumm (3-6 6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Daniel CukiermanCukierman – Ernest HabiyambereHabiyambere (6-1 7-67) – See score progression
- Gabriele PennafortiPennaforti – Ivan GakhovGakhov (5-7 6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- Corentin DenollyDenolly – Hernan CasanovaCasanova (7-6(2) 7-5) – See score progression
- Preston BrownBrown – S D Prajwal DevD Prajwal Dev (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Max HoukesHoukes – Alafia AyeniAyeni (6-1 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
- Calvin HemeryHemery – David PichlerPichler (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Damien WengerWenger – Luca FantiniFantini (6-0 7-6(0)) – See score progression
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Bogdan BobrovBobrov (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Juan Pablo PazPablo Paz – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (7-6(9) 6-1) – See score progression
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Joshua SheehySheehy (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Emilien VoisinVoisin – Aziz OuakaaOuakaa (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti – Noah SchachterSchachter (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Lucas BouquetBouquet – Benjamin LockLock (4-6 7-6(2) 6-3) – See score progression
- Yshai OlielOliel – Ivan DenisovDenisov (6-4 6-2) – See score progression
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Clement TaburTabur (6-4 7-6(4)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Damien WengerWenger (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kamil MajchrzakMajchrzak – Juan Pablo PazPablo Paz (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel CukiermanCukierman – Stefan KozlovKozlov (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas BouquetBouquet – Yshai OlielOliel (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Preston BrownBrown – Max HoukesHoukes (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilien VoisinVoisin – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicholas David IonelDavid Ionel – Guy Orly IradukundaOrly Iradukunda (0-0) – H2H and prediction
