Charlie Robertson and Paul Jubb will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Glasgow Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 3:30 pm on COURT 6. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Paul Jubb who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Paul Jubb is the pick to win this match.
Paul Jubb -> 1.164
Charlie Robertson -> 4.75
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Charlie Robertson vs. Paul Jubb
There is no head to head record between Charlie Robertson and Paul Jubb since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Charlie Robertson
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 3-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 4-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, Robertson got to the 2nd round after beating Giles Hussey 7-5 6-4, Martyn Pawelski 6-76 6-4 6-2 and Tibo Colson 6-4 7-63.
In the 1st round, Charlie had a good straight sets win against Colson (6-4 7-63). During the match, Robertson scored 92 points vs Colson’s 85. Charlie was pretty aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about the service games, Robertson made 2 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Charlie Robertson lost the serve once and he saved 9 break points. Furthermore, Robertson put 66% of his first serves in, winning 70% (40/57) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (14/29) on the 2nd serve. The Brit broke Colson twice after converting 33% of his break points (2/6).
Robertson has a fantastic win-loss record in the last 2 years having won 70% of his matches (7-3). 3-0 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Robertson has a composed5-1 match record in the last 2 years on indoor hard courts.
Charlie has a compiled 3-0 win-loss record in 2024, 3-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Glasgow Challenger
Robertson has never competed in this tournament before.
Paul Jubb
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 47-27 | 26-13 | 0-2 | 12-7 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-13 | 19-9 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-26 | 7-9 | 10-4 | 12-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 51-13 | 48-10 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 502, the Brit got to the 2nd round after defeating George Houghton 7-5 6-3, David Poljak 7-5 6-3 and Francesco Maestrelli 6-4 5-7 6-3.
In the 1st round, The Brit defeated Maestrelli (6-4 5-7 6-3). During the match Jubb scored 108 points vs Maestrelli’s 97. Paul was quite aggressive to blast 42 winners.
Talking about serving, Jubb managed to score 6 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Paul Jubb was pretty effective on serve to win 74% (42/57) of his 1st serve and 56% (19/34) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Jubb broke Maestrelli 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Paul’s best result of the current year was reaching the semifinal in the Indian Wells 1 Challenger.
Jubb has a compiled 10-5 win-loss record in 2024, 6-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Robertson | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 76 | 73 |
| Pts | 272-235 | 247-204 |
| Total Points | 507 | 451 |
| Winners | 108 | 104 |
| %Winners | 40% | 42% |
Both Robertson and Jubb played 3 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players lost a set in the event. Charlie Robertson conceded 1 set, while Paul Jubb surrendered 1 set. Talking about their workload, Robertson and Jubb have played the same amount of sets 7. However, Robertson played 3 games more than Jubb. Charlie scored 108 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit managed to score 104 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Robertson | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 23 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 7.7 |
| 1st in | 152/232 | 131/200 |
| %1st in | 66% | 66% |
| 1st pts | 108/152 | 104/131 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 45/80 | 44/69 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 64% |
Robertson fired 9 aces (3 per match). Jubb blasted 23 aces (7.7 per match). Robertson won 71% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Jubb won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 64% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Robertson | Jubb |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 12 | 9 |
| Converted | 12/29 | 9/27 |
| % Converted | 41% | 33% |
| Conceded | 19 | 9 |
| Saved | 13 | 7 |
| % Saved | 68% | 78% |
| Times Broken | 6 | 2 |
The Brit broke his opponents 12 times with a 41% conversion rate. Robertson conceded his serve 6 times and he saved 68% of the break points that he conceded. The Brit broke his opponents 9 times with a 33% conversion rate. The Brit conceded his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded.
| Robertson | |||||
| Q1 Hussey |
Q3 Pawelski |
R1 Colson |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-4 | 6-76 6-4 6-2 | 6-4 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 31 | 23 | 76 | |
| pts | 79-65 | 101-85 | 92-85 | 272-235 | |
| Total points | 144 | 186 | 177 | 507 | |
| Winners | 32 | 36 | 40 | 108 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 36% | 43% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 0 | 7 | 2 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 6 | 6 | 14 | |
| 1st in | 42/60 | 53/86 | 57/86 | 152/232 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 62% | 66% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 32/42 | 36/53 | 40/57 | 108/152 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 68% | 70% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/18 | 21/33 | 14/29 | 45/80 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 64% | 48% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 4 | 6 | 2 | 12 | |
| Converted | 4/13 | 6/10 | 2/6 | 12/29 | |
| Converted % | 31% | 60% | 33% | 41% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 6 | 10 | 19 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 3/6 | 9/10 | 13 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 50% | 90% | 58% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |
| Jubb | |||||
| Q1 Houghton |
Q3 Poljak |
R1 Maestrelli |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | 7-5 6-3 | 6-4 5-7 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 21 | 31 | 73 | |
| pts | 72-53 | 67-54 | 108-97 | 247-204 | |
| Total points | 125 | 121 | 205 | 451 | |
| Winners | 28 | 34 | 42 | 104 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 51% | 39% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 11 | 6 | 6 | 23 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 34/53 | 40/56 | 57/91 | 131/200 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 71% | 63% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 28/34 | 34/40 | 42/57 | 104/131 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 85% | 74% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/19 | 9/16 | 19/34 | 44/69 | |
| % 2nd pts | 84% | 56% | 56% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9 | |
| Converted | 2/8 | 3/8 | 4/11 | 9/27 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 38% | 36% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 0 | 2 | 7 | 9 | |
| Saved | 0/0 | 2/2 | 5/7 | 7 | |
| Saved % | – | 100% | 71% | 57% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWWW
LLWLWWLWLL Tennis Scores in Glasgow Challenger
- Henry SearleSearle – Daniel CoxCox (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Egor GerasimovGerasimov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Charles BroomBroom – Elmar EjupovicEjupovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Steven DiezDiez (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Stuart ParkerParker – Kyle EdmundEdmund (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Clement ChidekhChidekh – Carlos TabernerTaberner (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hamish StewartStewart – Robert StrombachsStrombachs (1-0) – H2H and prediction
