Daniel Cox and Henry Searle will fight against each other in the 2nd round of the Glasgow Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 1:00 pm on COURT 6. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Daniel Cox who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Daniel Cox is the pick to win this match.
Daniel Cox -> 1.7
Henry Searle -> 2.07
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Daniel Cox vs. Henry Searle
This will be the 2nd time that Daniel Cox and Henry Searle clash against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Cox (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they fought against each other, Cox won 7-6(2) 6-4 in the 2nd round in M25 Sunderland back in January 2024.
Daniel Cox
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-27 | 20-14 | 0-0 | 7-7 | 10-6 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-20 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 11-7 | 16-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-6 | 23-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 459, Daniel reached the 2nd round after beating Andrea Guerrieri 0-6 7-5 6-3, Leonardo Rossi 6-1 6-1 and Jerome Kym 6-3 6-4.
In the 1st round, Daniel had a good straight sets win against Kym (6-3 6-4). During the match, Cox scored 63 points vs Kym’s 47. The Brit was extremely aggressive to blast 28 winners.
Talking about the service games, Cox scored just 1 ace for the entire match and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Daniel Cox was extremely efficient on serve to win 82% (28/34) of his 1st serve and 53% (10/19) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Brit broke Kym 3 times after converting 50% of his break points (3/6).
Cox has a solid record in the last 10 years having won 64% of his matches (171-96). 10-3 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Cox has a compiled 55-28 record in the last years on indoor hard courts.
Daniel has an aggregate 10-3 win-loss record in 2024, 10-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Glasgow Challenger
The Brit has never competed in this tournament before.
Henry Searle
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-26 | 7-7 | 3-5 | 10-9 | 4-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 10-10 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 874, the Brit got to the 2nd round after defeating Jiri Vesely 7-65 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Vesely (7-65 6-4). During the match Searle scored 65 points vs Vesely’s 62. Henry was extremely aggressive to blast 38 winners.
About the serving games, Searle made 8 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Henry Searle was extremely efficient on serve to win 83% (38/46) of his 1st serve and 57% (13/23) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Brit broke Vesely once after converting 50% of his break points (1/2).
Henry has an aggregate 4-3 win-loss record in 2024, 4-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Cox | Searle |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 7 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 60 | 23 |
| Pts | 209-167 | 65-62 |
| Total Points | 376 | 127 |
| Winners | 81 | 38 |
| %Winners | 39% | 58% |
Cox played 3 matches while Searle competed in 1 match. Cox started his run from the qualifications while Searle had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Daniel Cox conceded 1 set while Henry Searle hasn’t dropped a set so far. Cox has played 5 sets more than Searle (7 vs 2). Therefore, Cox played 37 games more than Searle. The Brit scored 81 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Searle made 38 winners (58%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Cox | Searle |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 5 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 1.7 | 8 |
| 1st in | 110/171 | 46/69 |
| %1st in | 64% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 81/110 | 38/46 |
| %1st pts | 74% | 83% |
| 2nd pts | 34/61 | 13/23 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 57% |
Cox blasted 5 aces (1.7 per match). Searle scored 8 aces . Cox won 74% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Searle won 83% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 57% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Cox | Searle |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 11 | 1 |
| Converted | 11/32 | 1/2 |
| % Converted | 34% | 50% |
| Conceded | 10 | 3 |
| Saved | 5 | 3 |
| % Saved | 50% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 0 |
Daniel broke his opponents 11 times with a 34% conversion rate. The Brit surrendered his serve 5 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Searle broke his opponent once with a 50% conversion rate. The Brit was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 3 break points.
| Cox | |||||
| Q1 Guerrieri |
Q3 Rossi |
R1 Kym |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 0-6 7-5 6-3 | 6-1 6-1 | 6-3 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 14 | 19 | 60 | |
| pts | 89-86 | 57-34 | 63-47 | 209-167 | |
| Total points | 175 | 91 | 110 | 376 | |
| Winners | 29 | 24 | 28 | 81 | |
| %Winners | 33% | 42% | 44% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 45/74 | 31/44 | 34/53 | 110/171 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 70% | 64% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 29/45 | 24/31 | 28/34 | 81/110 | |
| % 1st pts | 64% | 77% | 82% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/29 | 7/13 | 10/19 | 34/61 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 54% | 53% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 5 | 3 | 11 | |
| Converted | 3/12 | 5/14 | 3/6 | 11/32 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 36% | 50% | 34% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 2 | 1 | 10 | |
| Saved | 3/7 | 2/2 | 0/1 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 43% | 100% | 0% | 48% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 | |
| Searle | |||||
| R1 Vesely |
Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 6-4 | ||||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |||
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |||
| pts | 65-62 | 65-62 | |||
| Total points | 127 | 127 | |||
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |||
| %Winners | 58% | 58% | |||
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |||
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |||
| 1st in | 46/69 | 46/69 | |||
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |||
| 1st pts | 38/46 | 38/46 | |||
| % 1st pts | 83% | 83% | |||
| 2nd pts | 13/23 | 13/23 | |||
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |||
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |||
| Converted | 1/2 | 1/2 | |||
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |||
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |||
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |||
| Saved % | 100% | 33% | |||
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |||
Head 2 Head
LWWLLWWWLW
LLLLLWWWLW Tennis Scores in Glasgow Challenger
- Daniel CoxCox – Jerome KymKym (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Charles BroomBroom – Aidan MchughMchugh (4-6 6-2 7-65) – See score progression
- Egor GerasimovGerasimov – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (6-1 7-62) – See score progression
- Robert StrombachsStrombachs – Anton MatusevichMatusevich (7-63 6-1) – See score progression
- Henry SearleSearle – Jiri VeselyVesely (7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Hamish StewartStewart – Calvin HemeryHemery (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Alexander BlockxBlockx (6-1 5-7 4-1 ret.) – See score progression
- Egor GerasimovGerasimov – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (6-1 7-6(2)) – See score progression
- Daniel CoxCox – Jerome KymKym (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Charlie RobertsonRobertson – Tibo ColsonColson (6-4 7-6(3)) – See score progression
- Charles BroomBroom – Aidan MchughMchugh (4-6 6-2 7-6(5)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Kyle EdmundEdmund – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip PeliwoPeliwo – Stuart ParkerParker (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin LockLock – Elmar EjupovicEjupovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Altug CelikbilekCelikbilek – Nicola KuhnKuhn (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Egor GerasimovGerasimov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yshai OlielOliel – Steven DiezDiez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kacper ZukZuk – Clement ChidekhChidekh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Hamish StewartStewart – Robert StrombachsStrombachs (1-0) – H2H and prediction
