Charlie Robertson and Martyn Pawelski will play each other in the qualifications of the Glasgow Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Monday at 10:00 am on COURT 6. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Martyn Pawelski who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Martyn Pawelski is the pick to win this match.
Martyn Pawelski -> 1.182
Charlie Robertson -> 4.45
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Charlie Robertson vs. Martyn Pawelski
There is no head to head record between Charlie Robertson and Martyn Pawelski since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Charlie Robertson
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 3-4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 4-3 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked, the Brit got to the qualifications after beating Giles Hussey 7-5 6-4.
In the qualifications, Charlie had a good straight sets win against Hussey (7-5 6-4). During the match, Robertson scored 79 points vs Hussey’s 65. Charlie was pretty aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about the service games, Robertson couldn’t to score even 1 ace throughout the match and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Charlie Robertson was very effective on serve to win 76% (32/42) of his 1st serve and 56% (10/18) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. Charlie broke Hussey 4 times after converting 31% of his break points (4/13).
Robertson has a solid win-loss record in the last 2 years having won 62% of his matches (5-3). 1-0 on indoor hard courts in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this competition, Robertson has a compiled3-1 match record in the last 2 years on indoor hard courts.
Charlie has an aggregate 1-0 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Glasgow Challenger
Charlie has never competed in this tournament before.
Martyn Pawelski
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 30-25 | 13-10 | 3-5 | 14-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-17 | 17-12 | 9-2 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 13-13 | 13-11 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 9-8 | 7-3 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 482, Pawelski got to the qualifications after beating Benjamin Gusic Wan 6-2 6-3.
In the qualifications, Martyn had a good straight sets win against Gusic Wan (6-2 6-3). During the match Pawelski scored 64 points vs Gusic Wan’s 46. The Pole was extremely aggressive to blast 27 winners.
Talking about serving, Pawelski managed to score 8 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Martyn Pawelski lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Pawelski put 58% of his first serves in, winning 79% (27/34) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (12/25) on the 2nd serve. Martyn broke Gusic Wan 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
The Pole’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Loughborough.
Martyn has a compiled 10-4 win-loss record in 2024, 7-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Robertson | Pawelski |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 22 | 17 |
| Pts | 79-65 | 64-46 |
| Total Points | 144 | 110 |
| Winners | 32 | 27 |
| %Winners | 41% | 42% |
Both Robertson and Pawelski played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Robertson and Pawelski have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Robertson played 5 games more than Pawelski. Robertson scored 32 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, The Pole scored 27 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Robertson | Pawelski |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 8 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 8 |
| 1st in | 42/60 | 34/59 |
| %1st in | 70% | 58% |
| 1st pts | 32/42 | 27/34 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 79% |
| 2nd pts | 10/18 | 12/25 |
| %2nd pts | 56% | 48% |
Robertson didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Pawelski bagged 8 aces . Robertson won 76% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 56% of the points. On the other side, Pawelski won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Robertson | Pawelski |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 4 |
| Converted | 4/13 | 4/11 |
| % Converted | 31% | 36% |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 |
| Saved | 1 | 2 |
| % Saved | 33% | 67% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 |
Charlie broke his opponent 4 times with a 31% conversion rate. Robertson surrendered his serve twice and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded. Martyn broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. Pawelski conceded his serve once and he saved 67% of the break points that he conceded.
| Robertson | |||
| Q1 Hussey |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 79-65 | 79-65 | |
| Total points | 144 | 144 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 42/60 | 42/60 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 32/42 | 32/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/18 | 10/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 56% | 56% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/13 | 4/13 | |
| Converted % | 31% | 31% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 1/3 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Pawelski | |||
| Q1 Gusic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 64-46 | 64-46 | |
| Total points | 110 | 110 | |
| Winners | 27 | 27 | |
| %Winners | 42% | 42% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 8 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 34/59 | 34/59 | |
| % 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
| 1st pts | 27/34 | 27/34 | |
| % 1st pts | 79% | 79% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/25 | 12/25 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWWW
LLLWWLLWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Daniel CoxCox – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jiri VeselyVesely – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Egor GerasimovGerasimov – Mohamed SafwatSafwat (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kyle EdmundEdmund – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip PeliwoPeliwo – Harry WendelkenWendelken (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benjamin LockLock – Elmar EjupovicEjupovic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- David PoljakPoljak – Paul JubbJubb (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Calvin HemeryHemery – Hamish StewartStewart (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Carlos TabernerTaberner – David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Charles BroomBroom – Aidan MchughMchugh (2-1) – H2H and prediction
- Yshai OlielOliel – Steven DiezDiez (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nicola KuhnKuhn – Alex KnaffKnaff (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kacper ZukZuk – Clement ChidekhChidekh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stuart ParkerParker – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Robert StrombachsStrombachs – Anton MatusevichMatusevich (0-0) – H2H and prediction
