Paul Jubb and Hamish Stewart will square off in the 2nd round of the Nottingham Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 1:00 pm on COURT 2. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Paul Jubb who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Paul Jubb is the pick to win this match.
Paul Jubb -> 1.74
Hamish Stewart -> 2.02
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Paul Jubb vs. Hamish Stewart
This will be the 3rd time that Paul Jubb and Hamish Stewart square off. The head to head is 1-1 (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on indoor hard courts.
The last time that they played each other, Stewart won 6-0 6-2 in the quarter in M25 Glasgow back in 2023.
Paul Jubb
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 47-27 | 26-13 | 0-2 | 12-7 | 9-5 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 24-13 | 19-9 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-26 | 7-9 | 10-4 | 12-8 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 51-13 | 48-10 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 521, Paul reached the 2nd round after beating Antoine Escoffier 6-1 6-4.
In the 1st round, The Brit had a good straight sets win against Escoffier (6-1 6-4). During the match, Jubb scored 68 points vs Escoffier’s 49. Jubb was extremely aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Regarding the service games, Jubb blasted 9 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Paul Jubb was pretty effective on serve to win 72% (26/36) of his 1st serve and 54% (13/24) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Paul broke Escoffier 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Jubb has a fantastic match record in the last 8 years having won 70% of his matches (176-75). 3-2 on indoor hard courts in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Jubb has a composed19-13 record in the last 8 years on indoor hard courts.
Jubb’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in the Indian Wells 1 Challenger.
Paul has an overall 7-4 win-loss record in 2024, 3-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nottingham Challenger
Jubb has never competed in this tournament before.
Hamish Stewart
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26-20 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 17-10 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-21 | 23-13 | 0-0 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
| 2022 | 20-7 | 14-5 | 0-0 | 6-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 572, Hamish got to the 2nd round after defeating Giles Hussey 7-5 6-3, Marcus Walters 6-2 6-4 and Jiri Vesely 7-5 6-3.
In the 1st round, Hamish had a good straight sets win against Vesely (7-5 6-3). During the match Stewart scored 72 points vs Vesely’s 54. Stewart was very aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Stewart made 19 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Hamish Stewart was extremely efficient on serve to win 79% (31/39) of his 1st serve and 63% (10/16) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Brit broke Vesely 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Hamish’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Sunderland.
Hamish has an overall 9-2 win-loss record in 2024, 9-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Jubb | Stewart |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 60 |
| Pts | 68-49 | 204-155 |
| Total Points | 117 | 359 |
| Winners | 26 | 90 |
| %Winners | 38% | 44% |
Jubb played 1 match while Stewart competed in 3 matches. Stewart started his run from the qualifications while Jubb had a direct access to the main draw. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Jubb has played 4 set(s) less than Stewart (2 vs 6). Therefore, Jubb played 43 games less than Stewart. The Brit scored 26 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Hamish scored 90 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Jubb | Stewart |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 9 | 36 |
| Avg per match | 9 | 12 |
| 1st in | 36/60 | 121/172 |
| %1st in | 60% | 70% |
| 1st pts | 26/36 | 90/121 |
| %1st pts | 72% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 13/24 | 32/51 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 63% |
Jubb blasted 9 aces . Stewart recorded 36 aces (12 per match). Jubb won 72% points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Stewart won 74% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 63% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Jubb | Stewart |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 11 |
| Converted | 4/8 | 11/21 |
| % Converted | 50% | 52% |
| Conceded | 2 | 11 |
| Saved | 1 | 7 |
| % Saved | 50% | 64% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 4 |
Paul broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. Paul dropped his serve once and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Hamish broke his opponents 11 times with a 52% conversion rate. Hamish conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 64% of the break points that he conceded.
| Jubb | |||
| R1 Escoffier |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 68-49 | 68-49 | |
| Total points | 117 | 117 | |
| Winners | 26 | 26 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 9 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 36/60 | 36/60 | |
| % 1st in | 60% | 60% | |
| 1st pts | 26/36 | 26/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/24 | 13/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 54% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Stewart | |||||
| Q1 Hussey |
Q3 Walters |
R1 Vesely |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-3 | 6-2 6-4 | 7-5 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 18 | 21 | 60 | |
| pts | 68-56 | 64-45 | 72-54 | 204-155 | |
| Total points | 124 | 109 | 126 | 359 | |
| Winners | 35 | 24 | 31 | 90 | |
| %Winners | 51% | 38% | 43% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 10 | 7 | 19 | 36 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 47/61 | 35/56 | 39/55 | 121/172 | |
| % 1st in | 77% | 63% | 71% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 35/47 | 24/35 | 31/39 | 90/121 | |
| % 1st pts | 74% | 69% | 79% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/14 | 13/21 | 10/16 | 32/51 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 62% | 63% | 63% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 3 | 5 | 3 | 11 | |
| Converted | 3/6 | 5/7 | 3/8 | 11/21 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 71% | 38% | 52% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 7 | 1 | 11 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 5/7 | 0/1 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 71% | 0% | 138% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LLWLWWLWLL
LWLWWLLLWW Tennis Scores in Nottingham Challenger
- Abedallah ShelbayhShelbayh – Henry SearleSearle (6-3 4-6 6-2) – See score progression
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Remy BertolaBertola (6-3 7-64) – See score progression
- Giovanni Mpetshi PerricardMpetshi Perricard – Ryan PenistonPeniston (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Marvin MoellerMoeller – Filip KrajinovicKrajinovic (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
- Billy HarrisHarris – Alastair GrayGray (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Hamish StewartStewart – Jiri VeselyVesely (7-5 6-3) – See score progression
- Manuel GuinardGuinard – Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Matteo MartineauMartineau – Mattia BellucciBellucci (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Mikhail KukushkinKukushkin – Charles BroomBroom (6-4 7-63) – See score progression
- Paul JubbJubb – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (6-1 6-4) – See score progression
- Alexander BlockxBlockx – Valentin RoyerRoyer (6-77 6-3 7-64) – See score progression
- Tristan LamasineLamasine – Adrian AndreevAndreev (7-5 7-5) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Tristan LamasineLamasine – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Kyle EdmundEdmund – Joris De LooreDe Loore (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip PeliwoPeliwo – Jules MarieMarie (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Zdenek KolarKolar – Marvin MoellerMoeller (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matteo MartineauMartineau – Billy HarrisHarris (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Hamish StewartStewart – Paul JubbJubb (1-1) – H2H and prediction
