Andre Ilagan and Calum Puttergill will square off in the 1st round of the Burnie 2 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 12:30 pm on COURT 5. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Andre Ilagan who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Andre Ilagan is the pick to win this match.
Andre Ilagan -> 1.123
Calum Puttergill -> 5.55
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Andre Ilagan vs. Calum Puttergill
There is no head to head record between Andre Ilagan and Calum Puttergill since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Andre Ilagan
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 48-26 | 39-20 | 0-0 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 19-6 | 19-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 15-7 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 564 (career-high), the American reached the 1st round after beating Mitchell Harper 6-4 7-5 and Corey Gaal 6-4 6-3.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Harper (6-4 7-5). During the match, Ilagan scored 73 points vs Harper’s 61. Andre was quite aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about the service games, Ilagan made 5 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Andre Ilagan was exceptionally efficient on serve to win 80% (32/40) of his 1st serve and 60% (12/20) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Ilagan broke Harper 3 times after converting 33% of his break points (3/9).
Ilagan has a fantastic win-loss record in the last 3 years having won 73% of his matches (40-15). 6-2 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Ilagan has a compiled40-14 match record in the last 3 years on hard.
The American’s best result of the season was getting to the semifinal in the Indian Wells 2 Challenger.
Ilagan has a composed 6-2 win-loss record in 2024, 6-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Burnie 2 Challenger
Ilagan has never competed in this tournament before.
Calum Puttergill
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 3-7 | 3-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 11-22 | 8-16 | 3-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-28 | 25-26 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 899, Puttergill reached the 1st round after defeating Kokoro Isomura 6-3 6-2 and Moerani Bouzige 6-1 1-6 6-3.
In the qualifications, Calum had a good straight sets win against Isomura (6-3 6-2). During the match Puttergill scored 64 points vs Isomura’s 45. Puttergill was pretty aggressive to blast 28 winners.
About the serving games, Puttergill struck 4 aces and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Calum Puttergill was very effective on serve to win 72% (28/39) of his 1st serve and 64% (9/14) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Calum broke Isomura 4 times after converting 57% of his break points (4/7).
Puttergill has a compiled 2-2 win-loss record in 2024, 2-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ilagan | Puttergill |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 4 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 41 | 40 |
| Pts | 142-114 | 136-105 |
| Total Points | 256 | 241 |
| Winners | 54 | 57 |
| %Winners | 38% | 42% |
Both Ilagan and Puttergill played 2 matches. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.At the moment, Calum Puttergill conceded 1 set while Andre Ilagan hasn’t lost a set so far. Ilagan has played 1 set(s) less than Puttergill (4 vs 5). However, it’s interesting to notice that Ilagan played 1 game more than Puttergill. Andre scored 54 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, Puttergill made 57 winners (42%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ilagan | Puttergill |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 10 |
| Avg per match | 3.5 | 5 |
| 1st in | 68/109 | 78/117 |
| %1st in | 62% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 54/68 | 57/78 |
| %1st pts | 79% | 73% |
| 2nd pts | 25/41 | 22/39 |
| %2nd pts | 61% | 56% |
Ilagan bagged 7 aces (3.5 per match). Puttergill made 10 aces (5 per match). Ilagan won 79% points behind his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 61% of the points. On the other side, Puttergill won 73% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 56% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ilagan | Puttergill |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 7 | 8 |
| Converted | 7/18 | 8/12 |
| % Converted | 39% | 67% |
| Conceded | 5 | 7 |
| Saved | 3 | 3 |
| % Saved | 60% | 43% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 4 |
Ilagan broke his opponents 7 times with a 39% conversion rate. Ilagan lost his serve twice and he saved 60% of the break points that he conceded. The Australian broke his opponents 8 times with a 67% conversion rate. Calum conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 43% of the break points that he conceded.
| Ilagan | |||
| Q1 Harper |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 22 | |
| pts | 73-61 | 73-61 | |
| Total points | 134 | 134 | |
| Winners | 32 | 32 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 5 | 5 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 40/60 | 40/60 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 32/40 | 32/40 | |
| % 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/20 | 12/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/9 | 3/9 | |
| Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Puttergill | |||
| Q1 Isomura |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 64-45 | 64-45 | |
| Total points | 109 | 109 | |
| Winners | 28 | 28 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 39/53 | 39/53 | |
| % 1st in | 74% | 74% | |
| 1st pts | 28/39 | 28/39 | |
| % 1st pts | 72% | 72% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/14 | 9/14 | |
| % 2nd pts | 64% | 64% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/7 | 4/7 | |
| Converted % | 57% | 57% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWWLLWLW
LLLLLWWLLW Tennis Scores in Burnie 2 Challenger
- James McCabeMcCabe – Blake EllisEllis (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – Matthew DellavedovaDellavedova (6-2 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Li TuTu – Stefanos SakellaridisSakellaridis (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi – Mikalai HaliakHaliak (6-1 6-73 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Philip SekulicSekulic – Maxime ChazalChazal (6-3 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Dane SweenySweeny – Rio NoguchiNoguchi (6-4 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Hiroki MoriyaMoriya – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Luke SavilleSaville – Benjamin LockLock (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yasutaka UchiyamaUchiyama – Takuya KumasakaKumasaka (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex BoltBolt – Yuta ShimizuShimizu (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Calum PuttergillPuttergill – Andre IlaganIlagan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Li TuTu – Yusuke TakahashiTakahashi (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Omar JasikaJasika – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jake DelaneyDelaney – Tristan SchoolkateSchoolkate (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Masamichi ImamuraImamura – Makoto OchiOchi (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Adam WaltonWalton – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Matthew HulmeHulme – Yuki MochizukiMochizuki (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Taisei IchikawaIchikawa – Christian LangmoLangmo (0-0) – H2H and prediction
