Marvin Moeller and Daniel Cox will face off in the qualifications of the Nottingham Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Monday at 10:30 am on COURT 5. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Marvin Moeller who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Marvin Moeller is the pick to win this match.
Marvin Moeller -> 1.62
Daniel Cox -> 2.21
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Marvin Moeller vs. Daniel Cox
There is no head to head record between Marvin Moeller and Daniel Cox since this will be the first time that they will square off in the main tour.
Marvin Moeller
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 25-18 | 0-0 | 13-13 | 12-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 59-27 | 2-1 | 36-16 | 20-8 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
| 2022 | 18-7 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 16-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 29-26 | 1-5 | 12-9 | 10-8 | 0-0 | 6-4 |
| 2020 | 14-7 | 6-2 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 7-2 |
Ranked no. 303, the German reached the qualifications after defeating David Poljak 6-4 7-63.
In the qualifications, The German had a good straight sets win against Poljak (6-4 7-63). During the match, Moeller scored 73 points vs Poljak’s 65. The German was exceptionally aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about the service games, Moeller struck 4 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Overall, Marvin Moeller was quite effective on serve to win 75% (33/44) of his 1st serve and 62% (16/26) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Marvin broke Poljak twice after converting 40% of his break points (2/5).
Moeller has a solid match record in the last 8 years having won 63% of his matches (164-98). 3-3 on indoor hard courts in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this event, Moeller has an aggregate58-34 win-loss record in the last 8 years on indoor hard courts.
Moeller has a compiled 3-3 win-loss record in 2024, 3-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nottingham Challenger
The German has never competed in this tournament before.
Daniel Cox
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12-6 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 10-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 37-27 | 20-14 | 0-0 | 7-7 | 10-6 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 35-20 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 11-7 | 16-6 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-6 | 23-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 430, Daniel reached the qualifications after beating Hynek Barton 6-2 6-3.
In the qualifications, Daniel had a good straight sets win against Barton (6-2 6-3). During the match Cox scored 63 points vs Barton’s 44. The Brit was exceptionally aggressive to blast 24 winners.
About the serving games, Cox scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Daniel Cox was extremely effective on serve to win 75% (24/32) of his 1st serve and 58% (14/24) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. The Brit broke Barton 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Cox has an overall 7-2 win-loss record in 2024, 7-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nottingham Challenger
Daniel has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Moeller | Cox |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 23 | 17 |
| Pts | 73-65 | 63-44 |
| Total Points | 138 | 107 |
| Winners | 33 | 24 |
| %Winners | 45% | 38% |
Both Moeller and Cox played 1 match. Also both players started their run from the qualifications.Both players have not dropped a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Moeller and Cox have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Moeller played 6 games more than Cox. Moeller scored 33 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, The Brit bagged 24 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Moeller | Cox |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 1 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 1 |
| 1st in | 44/70 | 32/56 |
| %1st in | 63% | 57% |
| 1st pts | 33/44 | 24/32 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 75% |
| 2nd pts | 16/26 | 14/24 |
| %2nd pts | 62% | 58% |
Moeller made 4 aces . Cox scored 1 ace . Moeller won 75% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Cox won 75% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Moeller | Cox |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 2 | 4 |
| Converted | 2/5 | 4/10 |
| % Converted | 40% | 40% |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 |
| Saved | 3 | 3 |
| % Saved | 75% | 75% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 |
Marvin broke his opponent twice with a 40% conversion rate. The German conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded. The Brit broke his opponent 4 times with a 40% conversion rate. Cox conceded his serve once and he saved 75% of the break points that he conceded.
| Moeller | |||
| Q1 Poljak |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
| pts | 73-65 | 73-65 | |
| Total points | 138 | 138 | |
| Winners | 33 | 33 | |
| %Winners | 45% | 45% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 44/70 | 44/70 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 33/44 | 33/44 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/26 | 16/26 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 2 | 2 | |
| Converted | 2/5 | 2/5 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
| Cox | |||
| Q1 Barton |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 63-44 | 63-44 | |
| Total points | 107 | 107 | |
| Winners | 24 | 24 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 38% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 32/56 | 32/56 | |
| % 1st in | 57% | 57% | |
| 1st pts | 24/32 | 24/32 | |
| % 1st pts | 75% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/24 | 14/24 | |
| % 2nd pts | 58% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/10 | 4/10 | |
| Converted % | 40% | 40% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 3/4 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 75% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWWWWWLW
LWWLLWWWLW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Tristan LamasineLamasine – Adrian AndreevAndreev (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Kyle EdmundEdmund – Joris De LooreDe Loore (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Lorenzo GiustinoGiustino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan ChoinskiChoinski – Dimitar KuzmanovKuzmanov (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marcus WaltersWalters – Hamish StewartStewart (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ryan PenistonPeniston – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Ben JonesJones – Filip PeliwoPeliwo (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Charles BroomBroom – Anton MatusevichMatusevich (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Petr NouzaNouza – Remy BertolaBertola (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Paul JubbJubb – Antoine EscoffierEscoffier (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marvin MoellerMoeller – Daniel CoxCox (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alastair GrayGray – Kacper ZukZuk (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Valentin RoyerRoyer – (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Francesco MaestrelliMaestrelli – Manuel GuinardGuinard (1-0) – H2H and prediction
