Ezekiel Clark and Patrick Maloney will square off in the 1st round of the Cleveland Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Tuesday at 10:00 am on COURT 4. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Patrick Maloney who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Patrick Maloney is the pick to win this match.
Patrick Maloney -> 1.571
Ezekiel Clark -> 2.3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Ezekiel Clark vs. Patrick Maloney
There is no head to head record between Ezekiel Clark and Patrick Maloney since this will be the first time that they will play each other in the main tour.
Ezekiel Clark
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21-26 | 17-20 | 0-0 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 29-28 | 20-16 | 1-2 | 8-10 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 43-33 | 37-22 | 5-5 | 1-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 22-18 | 17-14 | 4-2 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 596, Clark reached the 1st round after defeating Keenan Mayo 4-6 6-3 7-5.
Clark has a winning record in the last 8 years having won 55% of his matches (146-119). 1-1 on indoor hard courts in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Clark has an overall19-27 record in the last 8 years on indoor hard courts.
The American has a compiled 2-3 win-loss record in 2024, 1-1 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cleveland Challenger
Patrick Maloney
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 36-19 | 16-9 | 7-2 | 13-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 11-8 | 5-3 | 1-2 | 5-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 18-10 | 4-3 | 7-3 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 891, the American got to the 1st round after beating Jacob Brumm 6-3 6-1 and Preston Brown 6-2 6-1.
In the qualifications, The American had a good straight sets win against Brown (6-2 6-1). During the match Maloney scored 63 points vs Brown’s 37. The American was quite aggressive to blast 26 winners.
Talking about serving, Maloney scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 1 double fault for the entire match. Patrick Maloney conceded no breaks for the entire match to put 76% of his first serves in, win 81% (26/32) of the points behind his 1st serve and 40% (4/10) on the 2nd serve. Maloney broke Brown 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Patrick started his run at this tournament from the qualifications. In the main draw, he hasn’t conceded yet a set in this event to conquer 62% of the points he played.
Patrick has an overall 6-3 win-loss record in 2024, 4-2 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Cleveland Challenger
The American has never competed in this tournament before.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Clark | Maloney |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 |
| Pts | 106-105 | 123-75 |
| Total Points | 211 | 198 |
| Winners | 49 | 49 |
| %Winners | 46% | 40% |
Clark played 1 match while Maloney competed in 2 matches. At the moment, Ezekiel Clark lost 1 set while Patrick Maloney hasn’t conceded a set so far. Clark has played 1 set(s) less than Maloney (3 vs 4). However, it is interesting to notice that they played the same amount of games (31). Clark scored 49 winners (46% of the total points). On the other side, The American bagged 49 winners (40%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Clark | Maloney |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 6 |
| Avg per match | 2 | 3 |
| 1st in | 79/117 | 60/81 |
| %1st in | 68% | 74% |
| 1st pts | 49/79 | 49/60 |
| %1st pts | 62% | 82% |
| 2nd pts | 17/38 | 10/21 |
| %2nd pts | 45% | 48% |
Clark bagged 2 aces . Maloney blasted 6 aces (3 per match). Clark won 62% points behind his first serve. He pretty solid on his second serve to win 45% of the points. On the other side, Maloney won 82% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Clark | Maloney |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 6 | 10 |
| Converted | 6/20 | 10/18 |
| % Converted | 30% | 56% |
| Conceded | 13 | 1 |
| Saved | 8 | 0 |
| % Saved | 62% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 1 |
Ezekiel broke his opponent 6 times with a 30% conversion rate. Clark surrendered his serve 5 times and he saved 62% of the break points that he conceded. Maloney broke his opponents 10 times with a 56% conversion rate. Maloney conceded his serve once and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Clark | ||||
| Q1 Mayo |
Q3 Kozlov |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-3 7-5 | 6-1 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 17 | 48 | |
| pts | 106-105 | – | 106-105 | |
| Total points | 211 | 0 | 211 | |
| Winners | 49 | 49 | ||
| %Winners | 46% | 0% | 46% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | ||
| 1st in | 79/117 | / | 79/117 | |
| % 1st in | 68% | 0% | 68% | |
| 1st pts | 49/79 | / | 49/79 | |
| % 1st pts | 62% | 0% | 62% | |
| 2nd pts | 17/38 | / | 17/38 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 0% | 45% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 6 | 6 | ||
| Converted | 6/20 | / | 6/20 | |
| Converted % | 30% | 0% | 30% | |
| Conceded | 13 | 13 | ||
| Saved | 8/13 | 0/ | 8 | |
| Saved % | 62% | – | 31% | |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 | ||
| Maloney | ||||
| Q1 Brumm |
Q3 Brown |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-1 | 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 16 | 15 | 31 | |
| pts | 60-38 | 63-37 | 123-75 | |
| Total points | 98 | 100 | 198 | |
| Winners | 23 | 26 | 49 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 41% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 5 | 1 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 28/39 | 32/42 | 60/81 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 76% | 74% | |
| 1st pts | 23/28 | 26/32 | 49/60 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 81% | 82% | |
| 2nd pts | 6/11 | 4/10 | 10/21 | |
| % 2nd pts | 55% | 40% | 48% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
| Converted | 5/8 | 5/10 | 10/18 | |
| Converted % | 63% | 50% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 0/0 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | – | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
WWLLWLLWLL
WLLWLWWWWW Tennis Scores in Cleveland Challenger
- James DuckworthDuckworth – Toby Alex KodatAlex Kodat (6-3 6-0) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Nathan PonwithPonwith (6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Tennys SandgrenSandgren – Tim HandelHandel (6-76 7-5 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ethan QuinnQuinn – Aidan MayoMayo (6-3 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Quinn VandecasteeleVandecasteele – Bruno KuzuharaKuzuhara (6-4 4-6 7-63) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – William GrantGrant (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Nick ChappellChappell (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Noah RubinRubin – Matija PecoticPecotic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Stefan KozlovKozlov – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas GerchGerch – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thomas FancuttFancutt – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emilio NavaNava – Gabi Adrian BoitanAdrian Boitan (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Keegan SmithSmith – Denis KudlaKudla (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Patrick MaloneyMaloney – Ezekiel ClarkClark (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- James Kent TrotterKent Trotter – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
