Matteo Gigante and Jason Jung will square off in the semifinal of the Nonthaburi 3 Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Saturday at 10:30 am on COURT B. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Matteo Gigante who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Matteo Gigante is the pick to win this match.
Matteo Gigante -> 1.71
Jason Jung -> 2.03
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Matteo Gigante vs. Jason Jung
There is no head to head record between Matteo Gigante and Jason Jung since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Matteo Gigante
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 41-25 | 27-10 | 11-10 | 2-4 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 32-29 | 10-5 | 19-18 | 1-5 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-20 | 9-1 | 27-15 | 2-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-15 | 2-2 | 16-7 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 4-9 | 1-1 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 171, Matteo reached the semifinal after defeating Arthur Weber 1-6 6-1 6-2, Gauthier Onclin 6-2 6-77 6-2 and Duje Ajdukovic 3-6 6-3 6-2.
In the quarter against Ajdukovic, Gigante recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 6-3 6-2). During the match, Gigante scored 76 points vs Ajdukovic’s 68. Gigante was exceptionally aggressive to blast 32 winners.
Talking about the service games, Gigante bagged 6 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Overall, Matteo Gigante was exceptionally effective on serve to win 80% (32/40) of his 1st serve and 63% (17/27) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Matteo broke Ajdukovic 3 times after converting 43% of his break points (3/7).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Italian has dropped 3 set in this event to conquer 54% of the points he played.
Gigante has a winning win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 58% of his matches (108-78). 7-2 on hard in 2024. Talking about his performance on the same surface of this competition, Gigante has a compiled29-11 win-loss record in the last 6 years on hard.
The Italian has a composed 7-2 win-loss record in 2024, 7-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nonthaburi 3 Challenger
The Italian has never competed in this tournament before.
Jason Jung
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-25 | 40-23 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 25-28 | 13-14 | 2-5 | 4-4 | 6-5 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 12-25 | 5-12 | 1-4 | 2-6 | 4-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-18 | 7-8 | 2-4 | 7-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 260, the Chinese reached the semifinal after beating Maximus Jones 6-2 6-1, Aziz Dougaz 6-4 7-64 and Ryan Peniston 6-4 6-3.
In the quarter, Jason had a good straight sets win against Peniston (6-4 6-3). During the match Jung scored 61 points vs Peniston’s 53. Jason was pretty aggressive to blast 30 winners.
About the serving games, Jung managed to score 3 aces and he was very solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Jason Jung was very effective on serve to win 75% (30/40) of his 1st serve and 57% (13/23) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Jason broke Peniston 3 times after converting 75% of his break points (3/4).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Jung hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 55% of the points he played.
Jung has an overall 4-1 win-loss record in 2024, 4-1 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Nonthaburi 3 Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2024. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Gigante | Jung |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 9 | 6 |
| Tot Games | 77 | 57 |
| Pts | 263-226 | 195-158 |
| Total Points | 489 | 353 |
| Winners | 98 | 84 |
| %Winners | 37% | 43% |
Both Gigante and Jung played 3 matches. At the moment, Matteo Gigante dropped 3 sets while Jason Jung hasn’t conceded a set so far. Gigante has played 3 sets more than Jung (9 vs 6). Therefore, Gigante played 20 games more than Jung. The Italian scored 98 winners (37% of the total points). On the other side, Jason managed to score 84 winners (43%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Gigante | Jung |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 15 | 9 |
| Avg per match | 5 | 3 |
| 1st in | 138/221 | 113/177 |
| %1st in | 62% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 98/138 | 84/113 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 74% |
| 2nd pts | 45/83 | 37/64 |
| %2nd pts | 54% | 58% |
Gigante bagged 15 aces (5 per match). Jung made 9 aces (3 per match). Gigante won 71% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 54% of the points. On the other side, Jung won 74% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 58% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Gigante | Jung |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 16 | 10 |
| Converted | 16/39 | 10/23 |
| % Converted | 41% | 43% |
| Conceded | 13 | 7 |
| Saved | 5 | 6 |
| % Saved | 38% | 86% |
| Times Broken | 8 | 1 |
Matteo broke his opponents 16 times with a 41% conversion rate. Matteo lost his serve 8 times and he saved 38% of the break points that he conceded. The Chinese broke his opponents 10 times with a 43% conversion rate. Jason conceded his serve once and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded.
| Gigante | |||||
| R1 Weber |
R2 Onclin |
1/4 Ajdukovic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 1-6 6-1 6-2 | 6-2 6-77 6-2 | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | |
| Tot Games | 22 | 29 | 26 | 77 | |
| pts | 75-62 | 112-96 | 76-68 | 263-226 | |
| Total points | 137 | 208 | 144 | 489 | |
| Winners | 27 | 39 | 32 | 98 | |
| %Winners | 36% | 35% | 42% | 37% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 3 | 6 | 6 | 15 | |
| Double Faults | 4 | 4 | 3 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 39/66 | 59/88 | 40/67 | 138/221 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 67% | 60% | 62% | |
| 1st pts | 27/39 | 39/59 | 32/40 | 98/138 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 66% | 80% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/27 | 16/29 | 17/27 | 45/83 | |
| % 2nd pts | 44% | 55% | 63% | 54% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 6 | 7 | 3 | 16 | |
| Converted | 6/12 | 7/20 | 3/7 | 16/39 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 35% | 43% | 41% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 4 | 2 | 13 | |
| Saved | 3/7 | 1/4 | 1/2 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 43% | 25% | 50% | 39% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 3 | 1 | 8 | |
| Jung | |||||
| R1 Jones |
R2 Dougaz |
1/4 Peniston |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-1 | 6-4 7-64 | 6-4 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | |
| Tot Games | 15 | 23 | 19 | 57 | |
| pts | 55-34 | 79-71 | 61-53 | 195-158 | |
| Total points | 89 | 150 | 114 | 353 | |
| Winners | 22 | 32 | 30 | 84 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 41% | 49% | 43% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 4 | 2 | 3 | 9 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 | |
| 1st in | 31/44 | 42/70 | 40/63 | 113/177 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 60% | 63% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 22/31 | 32/42 | 30/40 | 84/113 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 76% | 75% | 74% | |
| 2nd pts | 8/13 | 16/28 | 13/23 | 37/64 | |
| % 2nd pts | 62% | 57% | 57% | 58% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 2 | 3 | 10 | |
| Converted | 5/7 | 2/12 | 3/4 | 10/23 | |
| Converted % | 71% | 17% | 75% | 43% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 1/2 | 2/2 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 50% | 100% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWWWLLWW
LWWWLW Tennis Scores in Nonthaburi 3 Challenger
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Nicolas Moreno De AlboranMoreno De Alboran (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Matteo GiganteGigante – Duje AjdukovicAjdukovic (3-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Jason JungJung – Ryan PenistonPeniston (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Seong Chan HongChan Hong – Dennis NovakNovak (6-2 ret.) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Giovanni FonioFonio – Seong Chan HongChan Hong (0-0) – H2H and prediction
