Brandon Holt and Daniel Cukierman will clash against each other in the quarter of the Indian Wells 1 Challenger for the 2nd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 10:00 am on PC3. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Brandon Holt who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Brandon Holt is the pick to win this match.
Brandon Holt -> 1.24
Daniel Cukierman -> 3.7
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Brandon Holt vs. Daniel Cukierman
This will be the 2nd time that Brandon Holt and Daniel Cukierman fight against each other. The head to head is 1-0 for Holt (see full H2H stats), 1-0 on hard.
The last time that they played each other, Holt won 1-6 6-4 6-2 in the quarter in USA F24 (Claremont) back in 2018.
Brandon Holt
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 43-31 | 37-24 | 1-1 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 22-24 | 14-16 | 1-2 | 7-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 52-21 | 48-17 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 3-6 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-5 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 244, Holt got to the quarter after defeating Blaise Bicknell 6-2 5-7 6-2 and Strong Kirchheimer 6-3 6-3.
In the 2nd round, Brandon had a good straight sets win against Kirchheimer (6-3 6-3). During the match, Holt scored 69 points vs Kirchheimer’s 49. The American was pretty aggressive to blast 29 winners.
Talking about the service games, Holt wasn’t able to score even 1 ace during the encounter and he was extremely consistent in conceding no double faults. Brandon Holt lost the serve once and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Holt put 72% of his first serves in, winning 85% (29/34) of the points behind his 1st serve and 46% (6/13) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Kirchheimer 4 times after converting 40% of his break points (4/10).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Brandon has lost 1 set in this tournament to conquer 57% of the points he played.
Holt has a solid match record in the last 9 years having won 61% of his matches (138-87). 6-2 on hard in 2024. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Holt has an overall121-71 win-loss record in the last 9 years on hard.
Brandon has an overall 6-2 win-loss record in 2024, 6-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Indian Wells 1 Challenger
Daniel Cukierman
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 21-18 | 5-5 | 16-11 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 34-25 | 17-11 | 6-5 | 11-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 49-28 | 39-14 | 5-7 | 5-6 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-13 | 3-4 | 20-8 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 16-7 | 9-6 | 1-0 | 6-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 486, Daniel got to the quarter after defeating Vasek Pospisil 3-6 6-1 6-4 and James Kent Trotter 6-4 6-4.
In the 2nd round, The Israeli had a good straight sets win against Kent Trotter (6-4 6-4). During the match Cukierman scored 61 points vs Kent Trotter’s 51. Daniel was quite aggressive to blast 25 winners.
About the serving games, Cukierman fired 2 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Daniel Cukierman lost the serve twice. Furthermore, Cukierman put 65% of his first serves in, winning 74% (25/34) of the points behind his 1st serve and 50% (9/18) on the 2nd serve. Cukierman broke Kent Trotter 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Daniel has conceded 1 set in the tournament to win 53% of the points he played.
Cukierman has a compiled 2-0 win-loss record in 2024, 2-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Holt | Cukierman |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 5 |
| Tot Games | 46 | 46 |
| Pts | 160-120 | 155-138 |
| Total Points | 280 | 293 |
| Winners | 64 | 61 |
| %Winners | 40% | 39% |
Both Holt and Cukierman played 2 matches. Both players lost a set in the event. Brandon Holt conceded 1 set, while Daniel Cukierman lost 1 set. Talking about their workload, Holt and Cukierman have played the same amount of sets 5. They also played the same amount of games (46). Holt scored 64 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Daniel scored 61 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Holt | Cukierman |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 1 | 1 |
| 1st in | 85/128 | 87/133 |
| %1st in | 66% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 64/85 | 61/87 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 70% |
| 2nd pts | 21/43 | 22/46 |
| %2nd pts | 49% | 48% |
Holt bagged 2 aces (1 per match). Cukierman made 2 aces (1 per match). Holt won 75% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 49% of the points. On the other side, Cukierman won 70% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Holt | Cukierman |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 11 | 9 |
| Converted | 11/20 | 9/22 |
| % Converted | 55% | 41% |
| Conceded | 10 | 6 |
| Saved | 5 | 1 |
| % Saved | 50% | 17% |
| Times Broken | 5 | 5 |
Holt broke his opponents 11 times with a 55% conversion rate. Brandon lost his serve 5 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Daniel broke his opponents 9 times with a 41% conversion rate. Cukierman conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 17% of the break points that he conceded.
| Holt | ||||
| R1 Bicknell |
R2 Kirchheimer |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 5-7 6-2 | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 28 | 18 | 46 | |
| pts | 91-71 | 69-49 | 160-120 | |
| Total points | 162 | 118 | 280 | |
| Winners | 35 | 29 | 64 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 42% | 40% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 2 | 0 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 51/81 | 34/47 | 85/128 | |
| % 1st in | 63% | 72% | 66% | |
| 1st pts | 35/51 | 29/34 | 64/85 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 85% | 75% | |
| 2nd pts | 15/30 | 6/13 | 21/43 | |
| % 2nd pts | 50% | 46% | 49% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 7 | 4 | 11 | |
| Converted | 7/10 | 4/10 | 11/20 | |
| Converted % | 70% | 40% | 55% | |
| Conceded | 7 | 3 | 10 | |
| Saved | 3/7 | 2/3 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 43% | 67% | 55% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 1 | 5 | |
| Cukierman | ||||
| R1 Pospisil |
R2 Kent |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 6-1 6-4 | 6-4 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 26 | 20 | 46 | |
| pts | 94-87 | 61-51 | 155-138 | |
| Total points | 181 | 112 | 293 | |
| Winners | 36 | 25 | 61 | |
| %Winners | 38% | 41% | 39% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 8 | 2 | 10 | |
| 1st in | 53/81 | 34/52 | 87/133 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 36/53 | 25/34 | 61/87 | |
| % 1st pts | 68% | 74% | 70% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/28 | 9/18 | 22/46 | |
| % 2nd pts | 46% | 50% | 48% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 9 | |
| Converted | 5/14 | 4/8 | 9/22 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 50% | 41% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 2 | 6 | |
| Saved | 1/4 | 0/2 | 1 | |
| Saved % | 25% | 0% | 13% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLWLWWL
LLWLWLWWWW 
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski – Marco TrungellitiTrungelliti (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Daniel CukiermanCukierman – Brandon HoltHolt (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Omni KumarKumar – Paul JubbJubb (0-0) – H2H and prediction
