Botic Van De Zandschulp and Juncheng Shang will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Hong Kong Tennis Open for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 2:00 pm on CENTRE COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Botic Van De Zandschulp who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Botic Van De Zandschulp is the pick to win this match.
Botic Van De Zandschulp -> 1.74
Juncheng Shang -> 2.1
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Botic Van De Zandschulp vs. Juncheng Shang
There is no head to head record between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Juncheng Shang since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Botic Van De Zandschulp
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 27-28 | 8-10 | 16-12 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 10-9 | 4-6 | 12-7 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 38-29 | 14-11 | 11-7 | 7-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 53-23 | 17-5 | 24-10 | 9-5 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 19-14 | 1-2 | 6-6 | 8-5 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
Ranked no. 50, the Dutch got to the 2nd round after defeating Shintaro Mochizuki 7-5 6-1.
In the 1st round, Van De Zandschulp had a good straight sets win against Mochizuki (7-5 6-1). During the match, Van De Zandschulp scored 73 points vs Mochizuki’s 57. Botic was extremely aggressive to blast 30 winners.
Talking about the service games, Van De Zandschulp bagged 3 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Botic Van De Zandschulp lost the serve twice and he saved 10 break points. Furthermore, Van De Zandschulp put 59% of his first serves in, winning 71% (30/42) of the points behind his 1st serve and 48% (14/29) on the 2nd serve. Botic broke Mochizuki 5 times after converting 50% of his break points (5/10).
Van De Zandschulp has a solid win-loss record in the last 10 years having won 64% of his matches (314-174). 1-0 on hard in 2024. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Van De Zandschulp has a compiled 53-32 record in the last years on hard.
Van De Zandschulp has an overall 1-0 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Hong Kong
Van De Zandschulp has never competed in this tournament before.
Juncheng Shang
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 39-19 | 24-8 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 7-4 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-23 | 21-14 | 3-3 | 0-2 | 7-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 40-24 | 17-8 | 15-10 | 7-5 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 18-5 | 6-3 | 12-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 183, the Chinese reached the 2nd round after beating Laslo Djere 6-75 6-3 7-68.
In the 1st round against Djere, Juncheng recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (6-75 6-3 7-68). During the match Shang scored 117 points vs Djere’s 101. Shang was pretty aggressive to blast 52 winners.
Talking about serving, Shang scored 4 aces and he was quite solid in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Overall, Juncheng Shang was pretty efficient on serve to win 81% (52/64) of his 1st serve and 59% (19/32) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve twice. The Chinese broke Djere 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
The Chinese has an overall 1-0 win-loss record in 2024, 1-0 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Van De Zandschulp | Shang |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 35 |
| Pts | 73-57 | 117-101 |
| Total Points | 130 | 218 |
| Winners | 30 | 52 |
| %Winners | 41% | 44% |
Both Van De Zandschulp and Shang played 1 match. At the moment, Juncheng Shang lost 1 set while Botic Van De Zandschulp hasn’t lost a set so far. Van De Zandschulp has played 1 set(s) less than Shang (2 vs 3). Therefore, Van De Zandschulp played 16 games less than Shang. Van De Zandschulp scored 30 winners (41% of the total points). On the other side, Juncheng blasted 52 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Van De Zandschulp | Shang |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 3 | 4 |
| Avg per match | 3 | 4 |
| 1st in | 42/71 | 64/96 |
| %1st in | 59% | 67% |
| 1st pts | 30/42 | 52/64 |
| %1st pts | 71% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 14/29 | 19/32 |
| %2nd pts | 48% | 59% |
Van De Zandschulp fired 3 aces . Shang struck 4 aces . Van De Zandschulp won 71% points on his first serve. He quite strong on his second serve to win 48% of the points. On the other side, Shang won 81% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 59% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Van De Zandschulp | Shang |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 5 | 4 |
| Converted | 5/10 | 4/11 |
| % Converted | 50% | 36% |
| Conceded | 12 | 2 |
| Saved | 10 | 0 |
| % Saved | 83% | 0% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 |
Van De Zandschulp broke his opponent 5 times with a 50% conversion rate. Botic dropped his serve twice and he saved 83% of the break points that he conceded. Shang broke his opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. Shang conceded his serve twice and he saved 0% of the break points that he conceded.
| Van De Zandschulp | |||
| R1 Mochizuki |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-5 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 19 | 19 | |
| pts | 73-57 | 73-57 | |
| Total points | 130 | 130 | |
| Winners | 30 | 30 | |
| %Winners | 41% | 41% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 3 | 3 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 42/71 | 42/71 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 59% | |
| 1st pts | 30/42 | 30/42 | |
| % 1st pts | 71% | 71% | |
| 2nd pts | 14/29 | 14/29 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 48% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 5 | 5 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 5/10 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 12 | 12 | |
| Saved | 10/12 | 10 | |
| Saved % | 83% | 83% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Shang | |||
| R1 Djere |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-75 6-3 7-68 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 35 | 35 | |
| pts | 117-101 | 117-101 | |
| Total points | 218 | 218 | |
| Winners | 52 | 52 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 4 | 4 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 64/96 | 64/96 | |
| % 1st in | 67% | 67% | |
| 1st pts | 52/64 | 52/64 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 19/32 | 19/32 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 59% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLLWLWWL
WWWWWLWWWW Tennis Scores in Hong Kong
- Liam BroadyBroady – Pedro CachinCachin (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Jan-Lennard StruffStruff – Marin CilicCilic (3-6 7-64 7-67) – See score progression
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Taro DanielDaniel (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut – Fabian MarozsanMarozsan (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur FilsFils – Borna GojoGojo (6-3 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – Shintaro MochizukiMochizuki (7-5 6-1) – See score progression
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Benjamin BonziBonzi (6-75 6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Alexander Erler/Lucas MiedlerErler/Lucas Miedler – Fabian Marozsan/Sebastian OfnerMarozsan/Sebastian Ofner (6-4 6-75 10-8) – See score progression
- Pavel KotovKotov – Nuno BorgesBorges (6-2 6-4) – See score progression
- Juncheng ShangShang – Laslo DjereDjere (6-75 6-3 7-68) – See score progression
- Liam BroadyBroady – Pedro CachinCachin (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Arthur FilsFils – Borna GojoGojo (6-3 4-6 6-1) – See score progression
- Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic – Taro DanielDaniel (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Jan-Lennard StruffStruff – Marin CilicCilic (3-6 7-6(4) 7-6(7)) – See score progression
- Sebastian OfnerOfner – Mackenzie McdonaldMcdonald (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut – Fabian MarozsanMarozsan (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Roberto Bautista AgutBautista Agut – Francisco CerundoloCerundolo (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Jan-Lennard StruffStruff – Sebastian OfnerOfner (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Botic Van De ZandschulpVan De Zandschulp – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Andrey RublevRublev – Liam BroadyBroady (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Frances TiafoeTiafoe – Miomir KecmanovicKecmanovic (3-1) – H2H and prediction
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori – Karen KhachanovKhachanov (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Lorenzo MusettiMusetti – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
