Sumit Nagal and Imanol Lopez Morillo will square off in the 2nd round of the Maspalomas Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 10:00 am on MASPALOMAS CENTRE COURT. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Sumit Nagal who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Sumit Nagal is the pick to win this match.
Sumit Nagal -> 1.36
Imanol Lopez Morillo -> 2.96
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Sumit Nagal vs. Imanol Lopez Morillo
There is no head to head record between Sumit Nagal and Imanol Lopez Morillo since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Sumit Nagal
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 32-29 | 15-13 | 16-11 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
2023 | 46-29 | 9-8 | 32-17 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 17-18 | 0-1 | 16-17 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 23-26 | 1-4 | 22-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 8-14 | 2-4 | 5-5 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 140, the Indian got to the 2nd round after defeating Alejandro Moro Canas 6-0 6-2.
In the 1st round, Nagal had a good straight sets win against Moro Canas (6-0 6-2). During the match, Nagal scored 53 points vs Moro Canas’s 25. Sumit was quite aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Regarding the service games, Nagal wasn’t able to score even 1 ace in the course of the match and he committed only 2 double faults. Sumit Nagal was very efficient on serve to win 80% (20/25) of his 1st serve and 62% (8/13) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The Indian was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Moro Canas 5 times.
Nagal has a solid match record in the last 10 years having won 61% of his matches (298-192). 32-16 on clay in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Nagal has an overall 209-120 match record in the last years on clay.
His best result of the year was winning the title the Rome Challenger where he overcame Jesper De Jong in the final 6-3 6-2 and the Tampere Challenger where he overcame Dalibor Svrcina in the final 6-4 7-5.
The Indian has a compiled 46-28 win-loss record in 2023, 32-16 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Maspalomas Challenger
Nagal has never competed in this tournament before.
Imanol Lopez Morillo
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 24-25 | 5-8 | 19-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 36-23 | 14-8 | 22-15 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 35-22 | 9-5 | 26-17 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 41-19 | 16-8 | 25-11 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 3-7 | 0-2 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 501 (career-high), the Spaniard reached the 2nd round after beating Markos Kalovelonis 6-4 6-75 6-3, Alex Marti Pujolras 7-61 ret. and Javier Barranco Cosano 7-5 6-4.
In the 1st round, Lopez had a good straight sets win against Barranco Cosano (7-5 6-4). During the match Lopez scored 84 points vs Barranco Cosano’s 77. Imanol was extremely aggressive to blast 29 winners.
About the serving games, Lopez managed to score 5 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Imanol Lopez Morillo lost the serve 4 times and he saved 4 break points. Furthermore, Lopez put 59% of his first serves in, winning 62% (29/47) of the points behind his 1st serve and 44% (14/32) on the 2nd serve. Imanol broke Barranco Cosano 6 times after converting 46% of his break points (6/13).
The Spaniard’s best result of the year was reaching the final in M25 Roda de Bara.
Imanol has a composed 35-22 win-loss record in 2023, 21-14 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Maspalomas Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Nagal | Lopez |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 3 |
Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
Tot Games | 14 | 67 |
Pts | 53-25 | 231-191 |
Total Points | 78 | 422 |
Winners | 20 | 107 |
%Winners | 38% | 46% |
Nagal played 1 match while Lopez competed in 3 matches. Lopez started his run from the qualifications while Nagal had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Imanol Lopez Morillo surrendered 1 set while Sumit Nagal hasn’t lost a set so far. Nagal has played 5 set(s) less than Lopez (2 vs 7). Therefore, Nagal played 53 games less than Lopez. Sumit scored 20 winners (38% of the total points). On the other side, The Spaniard managed to score 107 winners (46%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Nagal | Lopez |
---|---|---|
Aces | 0 | 19 |
Avg per match | 0 | 6.3 |
1st in | 25/38 | 135/204 |
%1st in | 66% | 66% |
1st pts | 20/25 | 107/135 |
%1st pts | 80% | 79% |
2nd pts | 8/13 | 33/69 |
%2nd pts | 62% | 48% |
Nagal didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Lopez blasted 19 aces (6.3 per match). Nagal won 80% points behind his first serve. He was rock solid on his second serve to win 62% of the points. On the other side, Lopez won 79% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 48% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Nagal | Lopez |
---|---|---|
Won | 5 | 9 |
Converted | 5/5 | 9/20 |
% Converted | 100% | 45% |
Conceded | 0 | 11 |
Saved | 0 | 6 |
% Saved | 0% | 55% |
Times Broken | 0 | 5 |
Nagal broke his opponent 5 times with a 100% conversion rate. Sumit very solid his serve as he has never lost a single service game after saving 0 break points. Lopez broke his opponents 9 times with a 45% conversion rate. Imanol conceded his serve 5 times and he saved 55% of the break points that he conceded.
Nagal | |||
R1 Moro |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-0 6-2 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 14 | 14 | |
pts | 53-25 | 53-25 | |
Total points | 78 | 78 | |
Winners | 20 | 20 | |
%Winners | 38% | 38% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 0 | 0 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 25/38 | 25/38 | |
% 1st in | 66% | 66% | |
1st pts | 20/25 | 20/25 | |
% 1st pts | 80% | 80% | |
2nd pts | 8/13 | 8/13 | |
% 2nd pts | 62% | 62% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 5 | 5 | |
Converted | 5/5 | 5/5 | |
Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
Conceded | 0 | 0 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 0 | |
Saved % | – | 0% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Lopez | |||||
Q1 Kalovelonis |
Q3 Marti Pujolras |
R1 Barranco Cosano |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | 6-4 6-75 6-3 | 7-61 ret. | 7-5 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | |
Tot Games | 32 | 13 | 22 | 67 | |
pts | 99-72 | 48-42 | 84-77 | 231-191 | |
Total points | 171 | 90 | 161 | 422 | |
Winners | 55 | 23 | 29 | 107 | |
%Winners | 56% | 48% | 35% | 46% | |
SERVE | |||||
Aces | 11 | 3 | 5 | 19 | |
Double Faults | 6 | 1 | 3 | 10 | |
1st in | 56/80 | 32/45 | 47/79 | 135/204 | |
% 1st in | 70% | 71% | 59% | 66% | |
1st pts | 55/56 | 23/32 | 29/47 | 107/135 | |
% 1st pts | 98% | 72% | 62% | 79% | |
2nd pts | 13/24 | 6/13 | 14/32 | 33/69 | |
% 2nd pts | 54% | 46% | 44% | 48% | |
Breaks | |||||
Won | 2 | 1 | 6 | 9 | |
Converted | 2/3 | 1/4 | 6/13 | 9/20 | |
Converted % | 67% | 25% | 46% | 45% | |
Conceded | 0 | 3 | 8 | 11 | |
Saved | 0/0 | 2/3 | 4/8 | 6 | |
Saved % | – | 67% | 50% | 117% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Maspalomas Challenger
- Jonas ForejtekForejtek – Ivan GakhovGakhov (2-6 6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Gerard Campana LeeCampana Lee (4-6 6-4 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Daniel RinconRincon – Timo StodderStodder (7-5 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Adrian AndreevAndreev – David Jorda SanchisJorda Sanchis (6-3 7-65) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Pedro Martinez PorteroMartinez Portero – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Imanol Lopez MorilloLopez Morillo – Sumit NagalNagal (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Filip MisolicMisolic – Adrian AndreevAndreev (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh – (0-0) – H2H and prediction