Gilbert Klier Junior and Ignacio Buse will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Temuco Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 2:30 pm on CANCHA 2. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Ignacio Buse who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Ignacio Buse is the pick to win this match.
Ignacio Buse -> 1.72
Gilbert Klier Junior -> 2.03
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Gilbert Klier Junior vs. Ignacio Buse
There is no head to head record between Gilbert Klier Junior and Ignacio Buse since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Gilbert Klier Junior
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1-7 | 0-0 | 1-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 49-16 | 33-8 | 16-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-13 | 8-5 | 9-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 33-21 | 14-7 | 19-14 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-4 | 4-3 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 461, the Brazilian got to the 2nd round after defeating Benjamin Lock 6-3 6-2.
In the 1st round, The Brazilian had a good straight sets win against Lock (6-3 6-2). During the match, Klier Junior scored 73 points vs Lock’s 57. Gilbert was extremely aggressive to blast 35 winners.
Talking about the service games, Klier Junior scored 7 aces and he committed only 3 double faults. Gilbert Klier Junior conceded no breaks for the entire match to save 3 break points. Furthermore, Klier Junior put 70% of his first serves in, winning 76% (35/46) of the points behind his 1st serve and 45% (9/20) on the 2nd serve. Gilbert broke Lock 3 times after converting 25% of his break points (3/12).
Klier Junior has a solid win-loss record in the last 6 years having won 66% of his matches (145-76). 30-7 on hard in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Klier Junior has a composed83-34 win-loss record in the last 6 years on hard.
The Brazilian’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M15 Monastir,M15 Belem and M15 Buenos Aires.
The Brazilian has an aggregate 46-15 win-loss record in 2023, 30-7 on hard (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Temuco Challenger
Klier Junior has never competed in this tournament before.
Ignacio Buse
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 47-28 | 3-3 | 44-24 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 35-19 | 7-3 | 28-16 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 13-8 | 4-2 | 9-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 471, Buse got to the 2nd round after beating Brandon Perez 6-4 6-1, Ignacio Carou 6-4 6-1 and Hugo Dellien 1-6 7-63 6-4.
In the 1st round against Dellien, Ignacio recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (1-6 7-63 6-4). During the match Buse scored 91 points vs Dellien’s 89. The Peruvian was very aggressive to blast 36 winners.
Talking about serving, Buse bagged 6 aces and he committed only 8 double faults. Overall, Ignacio Buse was very efficient on serve to win 77% (36/47) of his 1st serve and 51% (19/37) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 4 times. Ignacio broke Dellien 3 times after converting 30% of his break points (3/10).
Buse’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Mendoza and M25 Zapopan.
The Peruvian has an overall 35-18 win-loss record in 2023, 7-2 on hard (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Klier Junior | Buse |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 7 |
| Tot Games | 17 | 64 |
| Pts | 73-57 | 220-173 |
| Total Points | 130 | 393 |
| Winners | 35 | 73 |
| %Winners | 48% | 33% |
Klier Junior played 1 match while Buse competed in 3 matches. Buse started his run from the qualifications while Klier Junior had a direct access to the main draw. At the moment, Ignacio Buse surrendered 1 set while Gilbert Klier Junior hasn’t conceded a set so far. Klier Junior has played 5 set(s) less than Buse (2 vs 7). Therefore, Klier Junior played 47 games less than Buse. Klier Junior scored 35 winners (48% of the total points). On the other side, Buse blasted 73 winners (33%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Klier Junior | Buse |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 7 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 7 | 3.7 |
| 1st in | 46/66 | 91/178 |
| %1st in | 70% | 51% |
| 1st pts | 35/46 | 73/91 |
| %1st pts | 76% | 80% |
| 2nd pts | 9/20 | 43/87 |
| %2nd pts | 45% | 49% |
Klier Junior recorded 7 aces . Buse scored 11 aces (3.7 per match). Klier Junior won 76% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 45% of the points. On the other side, Buse won 80% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 49% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Klier Junior | Buse |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 14 |
| Converted | 3/12 | 14/32 |
| % Converted | 25% | 44% |
| Conceded | 3 | 13 |
| Saved | 3 | 5 |
| % Saved | 100% | 38% |
| Times Broken | 0 | 8 |
Klier Junior broke his opponent 3 times with a 25% conversion rate. Gilbert pretty effective on his serve as he has never dropped a single service game after saving 3 break points. Ignacio broke his opponents 14 times with a 44% conversion rate. Ignacio conceded his serve 8 times and he saved 38% of the break points that he conceded.
| Klier Junior | |||
| R1 Lock |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | |
| pts | 73-57 | 73-57 | |
| Total points | 130 | 130 | |
| Winners | 35 | 35 | |
| %Winners | 48% | 48% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 7 | 7 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 46/66 | 46/66 | |
| % 1st in | 70% | 70% | |
| 1st pts | 35/46 | 35/46 | |
| % 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
| 2nd pts | 9/20 | 9/20 | |
| % 2nd pts | 45% | 45% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/12 | 3/12 | |
| Converted % | 25% | 25% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
| Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
| Buse | |||||
| Q1 Perez |
Q3 Carou |
R1 Dellien |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-4 6-1 | 6-4 6-1 | 1-6 7-63 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 17 | 30 | 64 | |
| pts | 64-40 | 65-44 | 91-89 | 220-173 | |
| Total points | 104 | 109 | 180 | 393 | |
| Winners | 17 | 20 | 36 | 73 | |
| %Winners | 27% | 31% | 40% | 33% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 2 | 3 | 6 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 5 | 8 | 15 | |
| 1st in | 18/40 | 26/54 | 47/84 | 91/178 | |
| % 1st in | 45% | 48% | 56% | 51% | |
| 1st pts | 17/18 | 20/26 | 36/47 | 73/91 | |
| % 1st pts | 94% | 77% | 77% | 80% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/22 | 11/28 | 19/37 | 43/87 | |
| % 2nd pts | 59% | 39% | 51% | 49% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 6 | 3 | 14 | |
| Converted | 5/13 | 6/9 | 3/10 | 14/32 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 67% | 30% | 44% | |
| Conceded | 1 | 4 | 8 | 13 | |
| Saved | 0/1 | 1/4 | 4/8 | 5 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 25% | 50% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 3 | 4 | 8 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLWLLLL
LLLWWLWLWW Tennis Scores in Temuco Challenger
- Ignacio BuseBuse – Hugo DellienDellien (1-6 7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Pedro SakamotoSakamoto – Juan Pablo FicovichPablo Ficovich (5-7 7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Gustavo HeideHeide – Juan Pablo PazPablo Paz (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Tomas Barrios VeraBarrios Vera – Diego Fernandez FloresFernandez Flores (6-1 6-2) – See score progression
- Conner Huertas Del PinoHuertas Del Pino – Andres AndradeAndrade (3-6 7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Blaise BicknellBicknell – Gabriel DecampsDecamps (6-76 6-4 7-64) – See score progression
- Keegan SmithSmith – Guido AndreozziAndreozzi (3-6 7-64 7-5) – See score progression
- Matias SotoSoto – Facundo MenaMena (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna – Mateus AlvesAlves (6-75 7-65 6-4) – See score progression
- Valentin VacherotVacherot – Mariano KestelboimKestelboim (7-5 6-2) – See score progression
- Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva – Jose StathamStatham (6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Federico Agustin GomezAgustin Gomez (6-74 7-64 7-62) – See score progression
- Alafia AyeniAyeni – Matias Franco DescotteFranco Descotte (4-6 6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Matheus Pucinelli De AlmeidaPucinelli De Almeida – Bruno KuzuharaKuzuhara (3-6 6-3 6-3) – See score progression
- Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva – Gonzalo LamaLama (6-2 6-1) – See score progression
- Gilbert Klier JuniorKlier Junior – Benjamin LockLock (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Matias SotoSoto – Facundo MenaMena (6-4 6-3) – See score progression
- Blaise BicknellBicknell – Gabriel DecampsDecamps (6-7(6) 6-4 7-6(4)) – See score progression
- Santiago Rodriguez TavernaRodriguez Taverna – Mateus AlvesAlves (6-7(5) 7-6(5) 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Gonzalo VillanuevaVillanueva – Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Marcelo Tomas Barrios VeraTomas Barrios Vera – Matias SotoSoto (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Santiago Fa Rodriguez TavernaFa Rodriguez Taverna – Matheus Pucinelle De AlmeidaPucinelle De Almeida (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Alafia AyeniAyeni – Conner Huertas Del PinoHuertas Del Pino (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Joao Lucas Reis Da SilvaLucas Reis Da Silva – Pedro SakamotoSakamoto (0-1) – H2H and prediction
