Martin Damm and Mats Rosenkranz will play each other in the 2nd round of the Champaign Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Thursday at 11:00 am on COURT 1. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Martin Damm who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Martin Damm is the pick to win this match.
Martin Damm -> 1.3
Mats Rosenkranz -> 3.3
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Martin Damm vs. Mats Rosenkranz
There is no head to head record between Martin Damm and Mats Rosenkranz since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Martin Damm
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 15-20 | 7-7 | 1-5 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2023 | 52-29 | 30-14 | 9-8 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2022 | 32-23 | 17-12 | 10-6 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2021 | 28-22 | 7-4 | 16-12 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
2020 | 5-11 | 3-6 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 266, the American got to the 2nd round after beating Alfredo Perez 7-63 6-4.
In the 1st round, The American had a good straight sets win against Perez (7-63 6-4). During the match, Damm scored 68 points vs Perez’s 64. Damm was extremely aggressive to blast 33 winners.
Talking about the service games, Damm managed to score 17 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Martin Damm was exceptionally effective on serve to win 87% (33/38) of his 1st serve and 60% (18/30) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. Martin broke Perez once after converting 33% of his break points (1/3).
Damm has a winning match record in the last 5 years having won 58% of his matches (120-88). 12-6 on indoor hard courts in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this competition, Damm has an aggregate22-17 match record in the last 5 years on indoor hard courts.
Martin’s best result of the year was getting to the final in M25 Santo Domingo,M25 Southaven and M25 Setubal.
Damm has a compiled 51-28 win-loss record in 2023, 12-6 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Champaign Challenger
Martin has never competed in this tournament before.
Mats Rosenkranz
Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 29-22 | 0-3 | 13-7 | 12-10 | 0-0 | 4-2 |
2023 | 35-34 | 4-9 | 4-10 | 22-12 | 2-2 | 3-1 |
2022 | 31-36 | 2-4 | 7-14 | 14-13 | 2-4 | 6-1 |
2021 | 42-30 | 1-1 | 20-18 | 15-9 | 5-0 | 1-2 |
2020 | 15-21 | 8-9 | 1-3 | 3-6 | 0-0 | 3-3 |
Ranked no. 451, Mats reached the 2nd round after beating Gabriel Debru 7-67 3-6 7-64.
In the 1st round, Rosenkranz defeated Debru (7-67 3-6 7-64). During the match Rosenkranz scored 115 points vs Debru’s 114. Rosenkranz was extremely aggressive to blast 54 winners.
About the serving games, Rosenkranz bagged 13 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Overall, Mats Rosenkranz was exceptionally effective on serve to win 76% (54/71) of his 1st serve and 53% (27/51) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve 3 times. The German broke Debru once after converting 33% of his break points (1/3).
Mats’s best result of the current year was reaching the final in M25+H Plaisir and M15 Danderyd.
Rosenkranz has an overall 34-32 win-loss record in 2023, 22-11 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
Points | Damm | Rosenkranz |
---|---|---|
Match played | 1 | 1 |
Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
Tot Games | 23 | 35 |
Pts | 68-64 | 115-114 |
Total Points | 132 | 229 |
Winners | 33 | 54 |
%Winners | 49% | 47% |
Both Damm and Rosenkranz played 1 match. At the moment, Mats Rosenkranz dropped 1 set while Martin Damm hasn’t dropped a set so far. Damm has played 1 set(s) less than Rosenkranz (2 vs 3). Therefore, Damm played 12 games less than Rosenkranz. Damm scored 33 winners (49% of the total points). On the other side, Mats recorded 54 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
Serve | Damm | Rosenkranz |
---|---|---|
Aces | 17 | 13 |
Avg per match | 17 | 13 |
1st in | 38/68 | 71/122 |
%1st in | 56% | 58% |
1st pts | 33/38 | 54/71 |
%1st pts | 87% | 76% |
2nd pts | 18/30 | 27/51 |
%2nd pts | 60% | 53% |
Damm recorded 17 aces . Rosenkranz scored 13 aces . Damm won 87% points behind his first serve. He very solid his second serve to win 60% of the points. On the other side, Rosenkranz won 76% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 53% of the points.
How they played the important points
Breaks | Damm | Rosenkranz |
---|---|---|
Won | 1 | 1 |
Converted | 1/3 | 1/3 |
% Converted | 33% | 33% |
Conceded | 3 | 11 |
Saved | 3 | 8 |
% Saved | 100% | 73% |
Times Broken | 0 | 3 |
The American broke his opponent once with a 33% conversion rate. The American had a solid display on his serve as he has never surrendered a single service game after saving 3 break points. Rosenkranz broke his opponent once with a 33% conversion rate. The German conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded.
Damm | |||
R1 Perez |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-63 6-4 | ||
Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
Tot Games | 23 | 23 | |
pts | 68-64 | 68-64 | |
Total points | 132 | 132 | |
Winners | 33 | 33 | |
%Winners | 49% | 49% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 17 | 17 | |
Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
1st in | 38/68 | 38/68 | |
% 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
1st pts | 33/38 | 33/38 | |
% 1st pts | 87% | 87% | |
2nd pts | 18/30 | 18/30 | |
% 2nd pts | 60% | 60% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 1 | 1 | |
Converted | 1/3 | 1/3 | |
Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
Conceded | 3 | 3 | |
Saved | 3/3 | 3 | |
Saved % | 100% | 100% | |
Times Broken | 0 | 0 |
Rosenkranz | |||
R1 Debru |
Total | ||
---|---|---|---|
Score | 7-67 3-6 7-64 | ||
Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
Tot Games | 35 | 35 | |
pts | 115-114 | 115-114 | |
Total points | 229 | 229 | |
Winners | 54 | 54 | |
%Winners | 47% | 47% | |
SERVE | |||
Aces | 13 | 13 | |
Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
1st in | 71/122 | 71/122 | |
% 1st in | 58% | 58% | |
1st pts | 54/71 | 54/71 | |
% 1st pts | 76% | 76% | |
2nd pts | 27/51 | 27/51 | |
% 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
Breaks | |||
Won | 1 | 1 | |
Converted | 1/3 | 1/3 | |
Converted % | 33% | 33% | |
Conceded | 11 | 11 | |
Saved | 8/11 | 8 | |
Saved % | 73% | 73% | |
Times Broken | 3 | 3 |
Head 2 Head
Tennis Scores in Champaign Challenger
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Karlis OzolinsOzolins (7-65 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ethan QuinnQuinn – Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer (6-1 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Kenta MiyoshiMiyoshi (6-3 6-1) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (7-65 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Alex RybakovRybakov (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Patrick KypsonKypson (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – Titouan DroguetDroguet (0-0) – H2H and prediction