Kenta Miyoshi and Patrick Kypson will clash against each other in the 2nd round of the Champaign Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 7:30 pm on COURT 1. In the following lines you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Patrick Kypson who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Patrick Kypson is the pick to win this match.
Patrick Kypson -> 1.122
Kenta Miyoshi -> 5.5
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Kenta Miyoshi vs. Patrick Kypson
There is no head to head record between Kenta Miyoshi and Patrick Kypson since this will be the first time that they will fight against each other in the main tour.
Kenta Miyoshi
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24-12 | 12-6 | 2-1 | 10-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 10-11 | 7-9 | 2-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 9-5 | 8-4 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Currently unranked,he will start his run in the Champaign Challenger after he played his last match in the Champaign Challenger where he defeated 6-3 6-4 to Heck in the 1st round on the 14th of November.
Kenta has a composed 9-8 win-loss record in 2023, 0-0 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
This will be the first match of the year on indoor hard courts.
Talking about his overall career, The Japanese has an overall 18-13 record. He has a flat 1-1 record on indoor hard courts.
Previously in the Champaign Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2022. See his history.
Patrick Kypson
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 26-27 | 8-11 | 4-7 | 12-6 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 38-21 | 10-11 | 17-6 | 11-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 26-14 | 13-7 | 2-2 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 24-11 | 4-2 | 20-9 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 14-9 | 7-6 | 5-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 239 (career-high), Patrick got to the 2nd round after defeating Mark Whitehouse 6-1 7-65.
In the 1st round, Kypson had a good straight sets win against Whitehouse (6-1 7-65). During the match Kypson scored 70 points vs Whitehouse’s 52. Kypson was pretty aggressive to blast 31 winners.
About the serving games, Kypson bagged 11 aces and he committed only 2 double faults. Patrick Kypson was very effective on serve to win 86% (31/36) of his 1st serve and 68% (13/19) on the second serve. This was the main reason for not conceding a single break during the match. The American broke Whitehouse 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
His best result of the current season was conquering the title the Medellin Challenger where he overcame Benjamin Lock in the final 6-3 6-3.
The American has a composed 34-21 win-loss record in 2023, 7-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Champaign Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Miyoshi | Kypson |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Games | 19 | 20 |
| Pts | 60-49 | 70-52 |
| Total Points | 109 | 122 |
| Winners | 27 | 31 |
| %Winners | 45% | 44% |
Both Miyoshi and Kypson played 1 match. Both players have not lost a single set in this event so far. Talking about their workload, Miyoshi and Kypson have played the same amount of sets 2. However, Miyoshi played 1 game less than Kypson. Kenta scored 27 winners (45% of the total points). On the other side, The American blasted 31 winners (44%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Miyoshi | Kypson |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 11 | 11 |
| Avg per match | 11 | 11 |
| 1st in | 36/65 | 36/55 |
| %1st in | 55% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 27/36 | 31/36 |
| %1st pts | 75% | 86% |
| 2nd pts | 17/29 | 13/19 |
| %2nd pts | 59% | 68% |
Miyoshi blasted 11 aces . Kypson recorded 11 aces . Miyoshi won 75% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 59% of the points. On the other side, Kypson won 86% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 68% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Miyoshi | Kypson |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 3 |
| Converted | 3/5 | 3/8 |
| % Converted | 60% | 38% |
| Conceded | 7 | 2 |
| Saved | 6 | 2 |
| % Saved | 86% | 100% |
| Times Broken | 1 | 0 |
The Japanese broke his opponent 3 times with a 60% conversion rate. Kenta dropped his serve once and he saved 86% of the break points that he conceded. Kypson broke his opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. The American was rock solid on his serve as he has never conceded a single service game after saving 2 break points.
| Miyoshi | ||
| Total | ||
|---|---|---|
| Score | ||
| Tot Set | 0 | |
| Tot Games | 0 | |
| pts | 0-0 | |
| Total points | 0 | |
| Winners | 0 | |
| %Winners | 0% | |
| SERVE | ||
| Aces | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | |
| 1st in | 0/0 | |
| % 1st in | 0% | |
| 1st pts | 0/0 | |
| % 1st pts | % | |
| 2nd pts | 0/0 | |
| % 2nd pts | 0% | |
| Breaks | ||
| Won | 0 | |
| Converted | 0/0 | |
| Converted % | 0% | |
| Conceded | 0 | |
| Saved | 0 | |
| Saved % | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | |
| Kypson | |||
| R1 Whitehouse |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 7-65 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 20 | 20 | |
| pts | 70-52 | 70-52 | |
| Total points | 122 | 122 | |
| Winners | 31 | 31 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 44% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 11 | 11 | |
| Double Faults | 2 | 2 | |
| 1st in | 36/55 | 36/55 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 31/36 | 31/36 | |
| % 1st pts | 86% | 86% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/19 | 13/19 | |
| % 2nd pts | 68% | 68% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 3/8 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 2 | |
| Saved | 2/2 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 100% | 0% | |
| Times Broken | 0 | 0 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWWLWWLWL
LWWLWLWLWW Tennis Scores in Champaign Challenger
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Denis KudlaKudla (6-74 7-5 ret.) – See score progression
- Titouan DroguetDroguet – Viktor DurasovicDurasovic (6-2 6-3) – See score progression
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Enrico Dalla ValleDalla Valle (6-1 6-1) – See score progression
- Ethan QuinnQuinn – Emilio NavaNava (6-3 6-2) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Mark WhitehouseWhitehouse (6-1 7-65) – See score progression
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – Aidan MchughMchugh (6-2 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Inaki Montes-De La TorreMontes-De La Torre (5-7 6-0 6-1) – See score progression
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Chris RodeschRodesch (5-7 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Cooper WilliamsWilliams (6-3 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Alex MichelsenMichelsen – Bernard TomicTomic (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
- Martin DammDamm – Alfredo PerezPerez (7-63 6-4) – See score progression
- Strong KirchheimerKirchheimer – Evgeny KarlovskiyKarlovskiy (7-5 5-4 ret.) – See score progression
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Aidan MayoMayo (6-3 1-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – Gabriel DebruDebru (7-67 3-6 7-64) – See score progression
- Karlis OzolinsOzolins – Stefan KozlovKozlov (2-6 6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Cooper WilliamsWilliams (6-3 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Kenta MiyoshiMiyoshi – Hunter HeckHeck (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Mark WhitehouseWhitehouse (6-1 7-6(5)) – See score progression
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Denis KudlaKudla (6-7(4) 7-5 ret.) – See score progression
- Alex RybakovRybakov – Chris RodeschRodesch (5-7 6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Martin DammDamm – Alfredo PerezPerez (7-6(3) 6-4) – See score progression
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – Aidan MchughMchugh (6-2 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Alex MichelsenMichelsen – Bernard TomicTomic (6-4 6-0) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Sebastian FanselowFanselow – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mitchell KruegerKrueger – Alex RybakovRybakov (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Aleksandar KovacevicKovacevic – Karlis OzolinsOzolins (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Brandon HoltHolt – Titouan DroguetDroguet (0-0) – H2H and prediction
