Emil Ruusuvuori and Sumit Nagal will face off in the quarter of the Helsinki Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Friday at 5:30 pm on CENTER COURT. Here the head to head stats and relative prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Emil Ruusuvuori who should win in 2 sets.
As per the initial odds, Emil Ruusuvuori is the pick to win this match.
Emil Ruusuvuori -> 1.142
Sumit Nagal -> 5.25
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Emil Ruusuvuori vs. Sumit Nagal
There is no head to head record between Emil Ruusuvuori and Sumit Nagal since this will be the first time that they will face off in the main tour.
Emil Ruusuvuori
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 11-9 | 7-5 | 0-2 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 31-30 | 13-11 | 6-7 | 9-8 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-32 | 15-12 | 10-9 | 10-7 | 6-4 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 30-26 | 21-12 | 1-5 | 6-6 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 27-15 | 11-5 | 0-2 | 16-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 69, the Finn reached the quarter after defeating Joris De Loore 4-6 6-0 6-1 and Alex Molcan 6-2 7-5.
In the 2nd round, Ruusuvuori had a good straight sets win against Molcan (6-2 7-5). During the match, Ruusuvuori scored 75 points vs Molcan’s 56. Ruusuvuori was very aggressive to blast 20 winners.
Regarding the service games, Ruusuvuori bagged 3 aces and he committed only 1 double fault. Emil Ruusuvuori lost the serve once and he saved 5 break points. Furthermore, Ruusuvuori put 43% of his first serves in, winning 69% (20/29) of the points behind his 1st serve and 63% (24/38) on the 2nd serve. The Finn broke Molcan 4 times after converting 36% of his break points (4/11).
Overall Performance in this tournament
Ruusuvuori has conceded 1 set in this competition to win 58% of the points he played.
Ruusuvuori has a solid record in the last 9 years having won 62% of his matches (262-159). 9-6 on indoor hard courts in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this event, Ruusuvuori has an aggregate94-40 win-loss record in the last 9 years on indoor hard courts.
Emil’s best result of the current season was reaching the semifinal in Hertogenbosch.
The Finn has a composed 31-28 win-loss record in 2023, 9-6 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Helsinki Challenger
Sumit Nagal
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 19-10 | 15-8 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 46-29 | 9-8 | 32-17 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 17-18 | 0-1 | 16-17 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 23-26 | 1-4 | 22-22 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 8-14 | 2-4 | 5-5 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 169, Sumit got to the quarter after defeating Dennis Novak 6-2 6-3 and Jakub Mensik 7-5 6-2.
In the 2nd round, Nagal had a good straight sets win against Mensik (7-5 6-2). During the match Nagal scored 79 points vs Mensik’s 67. The Indian was pretty aggressive to blast 31 winners.
Talking about serving, Nagal scored just 1 ace during the entire match and he committed only 5 double faults. Sumit Nagal lost the serve twice and he saved 7 break points. Furthermore, Nagal put 67% of his first serves in, winning 60% (31/52) of the points behind his 1st serve and 54% (14/26) on the 2nd serve. Sumit broke Mensik 5 times after converting 63% of his break points (5/8).
Overall Performance in this tournament
The Indian hasn’t dropped yet a set in the tournament to win 56% of the points he played.
His best result of the season was conquering the title the Rome Challenger where he overcame Jesper De Jong in the final 6-3 6-2 and the Tampere Challenger where he beat Dalibor Svrcina in the final 6-4 7-5.
The Indian has an overall 43-26 win-loss record in 2023, 3-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
H2H Performance in the tournament (main draw)
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Ruusuvuori | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 2 | 2 |
| Tot Set | 5 | 4 |
| Tot Games | 43 | 37 |
| Pts | 157-116 | 142-113 |
| Total Points | 273 | 255 |
| Winners | 56 | 54 |
| %Winners | 36% | 38% |
Both Ruusuvuori and Nagal played 2 matches. At the moment, Emil Ruusuvuori dropped 1 set while Sumit Nagal hasn’t surrendered a set so far. Ruusuvuori has played 1 set more than Nagal (5 vs 4). Therefore, Ruusuvuori played 6 games more than Nagal. The Finn scored 56 winners (36% of the total points). On the other side, Nagal bagged 54 winners (38%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Ruusuvuori | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 8 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 4 | 1 |
| 1st in | 73/136 | 82/129 |
| %1st in | 54% | 64% |
| 1st pts | 56/73 | 54/82 |
| %1st pts | 77% | 66% |
| 2nd pts | 36/63 | 24/47 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 51% |
Ruusuvuori blasted 8 aces (4 per match). Nagal made 2 aces (1 per match). Ruusuvuori won 77% points behind his first serve. He pretty effective on his second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Nagal won 66% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Ruusuvuori | Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 9 | 10 |
| Converted | 9/20 | 10/18 |
| % Converted | 45% | 56% |
| Conceded | 9 | 11 |
| Saved | 7 | 8 |
| % Saved | 78% | 73% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
The Finn broke his opponents 9 times with a 45% conversion rate. The Finn lost his serve twice and he saved 78% of the break points that he conceded. The Indian broke his opponents 10 times with a 56% conversion rate. The Indian conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded.
| Ruusuvuori | ||||
| R1 De Loore |
R2 Molcan |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 4-6 6-0 6-1 | 6-2 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 2 | 5 | |
| Tot Games | 23 | 20 | 43 | |
| pts | 82-60 | 75-56 | 157-116 | |
| Total points | 142 | 131 | 273 | |
| Winners | 36 | 20 | 56 | |
| %Winners | 44% | 27% | 36% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 5 | 3 | 8 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| 1st in | 44/69 | 29/67 | 73/136 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 43% | 54% | |
| 1st pts | 36/44 | 20/29 | 56/73 | |
| % 1st pts | 82% | 69% | 77% | |
| 2nd pts | 12/25 | 24/38 | 36/63 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 63% | 57% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 4 | 9 | |
| Converted | 5/9 | 4/11 | 9/20 | |
| Converted % | 56% | 36% | 45% | |
| Conceded | 3 | 6 | 9 | |
| Saved | 2/3 | 5/6 | 7 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 83% | 75% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Nagal | ||||
| R1 Novak |
R2 Mensik |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-2 6-3 | 7-5 6-2 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | 4 | |
| Tot Games | 17 | 20 | 37 | |
| pts | 63-46 | 79-67 | 142-113 | |
| Total points | 109 | 146 | 255 | |
| Winners | 23 | 31 | 54 | |
| %Winners | 37% | 39% | 38% | |
| SERVE | ||||
| Aces | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 5 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 30/51 | 52/78 | 82/129 | |
| % 1st in | 59% | 67% | 64% | |
| 1st pts | 23/30 | 31/52 | 54/82 | |
| % 1st pts | 77% | 60% | 66% | |
| 2nd pts | 10/21 | 14/26 | 24/47 | |
| % 2nd pts | 48% | 54% | 51% | |
| Breaks | ||||
| Won | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 5/8 | 10/18 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 63% | 56% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 9 | 11 | |
| Saved | 1/2 | 7/9 | 8 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 78% | 64% | |
| Times Broken | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLLWWLWW
LWWWLWLWLL Tennis Scores in Helsinki Challenger
- Luke Johnson/Skander MansouriJohnson/Skander Mansouri – Vasil Kirkov/Ivan LiutarevichKirkov/Ivan Liutarevich (6-2 6-4) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Stefano TravagliaTravaglia – Radu AlbotAlbot (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Sumit NagalNagal – Emil RuusuvuoriRuusuvuori (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alexandre MullerMuller – Arthur RinderknechRinderknech (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Corentin MoutetMoutet – Jaume Antoni Munar ClarAntoni Munar Clar (0-0) – H2H and prediction
