Martin Damm and Nino Serdarusic will play each other in the 2nd round of the Charlottesville Challenger for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 12:00 pm on COURT 9. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Martin Damm who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Martin Damm is the pick to win this match.
Martin Damm -> 1.54
Nino Serdarusic -> 2.36
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Martin Damm vs. Nino Serdarusic
There is no head to head record between Martin Damm and Nino Serdarusic since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Martin Damm
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-13 | 6-4 | 1-5 | 7-4 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 52-29 | 30-14 | 9-8 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 32-23 | 17-12 | 10-6 | 5-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 28-22 | 7-4 | 16-12 | 5-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 5-11 | 3-6 | 2-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 272, Damm got to the 2nd round after defeating Zachary Svajda 2-6 6-3 7-63.
In the 1st round against Svajda, The American recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (2-6 6-3 7-63).During the match, Damm scored less points (4) than Svajda. In fact, the world no. 272 won 83 points vs Svajda’s. That means that Damm was more focused during the important points. The American was pretty aggressive to blast 48 winners.
Regarding the service games, Damm overwhelmed his opponent with 20 aces and he committed only 6 double faults. Martin Damm lost the serve twice and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Damm put 61% of his first serves in, winning 81% (48/59) of the points behind his 1st serve and 43% (16/37) on the 2nd serve. Damm was clinical in his return game without wasting any break point and break Svajda once.
Damm has a winning win-loss record in the last 5 years having won 58% of his matches (118-86). 10-4 on indoor hard courts in 2023. In connection with his performance on the same surface of this event, Damm has a composed20-15 record in the last 5 years on indoor hard courts.
Damm’s best result of the current season was reaching the final in M25 Santo Domingo,M25 Southaven and M25 Setubal.
Martin has an aggregate 49-26 win-loss record in 2023, 10-4 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charlottesville Challenger
Nino Serdarusic
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 11-10 | 1-2 | 10-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 30-33 | 0-4 | 26-23 | 4-6 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 27-34 | 6-6 | 17-20 | 4-7 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 26-33 | 0-0 | 23-25 | 3-8 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-14 | 3-2 | 6-5 | 8-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 284, Serdarusic reached the 2nd round after defeating Eliot Spizzirri 6-1 2-6 6-4.
In the 1st round, Serdarusic defeated Spizzirri (6-1 2-6 6-4). During the match Serdarusic scored 76 points vs Spizzirri’s 68. The Croatian was extremely aggressive to blast 41 winners.
Talking about serving, Serdarusic scored 12 aces and he was quite consistent in conceding no double faults for the entire match. Nino Serdarusic lost the serve 3 times and he saved 3 break points. Furthermore, Serdarusic put 77% of his first serves in, winning 69% (41/59) of the points behind his 1st serve and 39% (7/18) on the 2nd serve. Serdarusic broke Spizzirri 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
The Croatian’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in the Szekesfehervar Challenger.
Serdarusic has an overall 27-30 win-loss record in 2023, 1-3 on indoor hard courts (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Charlottesville Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the 2nd round in 2018. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Damm | Serdarusic |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 30 | 25 |
| Pts | 83-87 | 76-68 |
| Total Points | 170 | 144 |
| Winners | 48 | 41 |
| %Winners | 58% | 54% |
Both Damm and Serdarusic played 1 match. Both players lost a set in the event. Martin Damm lost 1 set, while Nino Serdarusic lost 1 set. Talking about their workload, Damm and Serdarusic have played the same amount of sets 3. However, Damm played 5 games more than Serdarusic. Damm scored 48 winners (58% of the total points). On the other side, Nino fired 41 winners (54%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Damm | Serdarusic |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 20 | 12 |
| Avg per match | 20 | 12 |
| 1st in | 59/96 | 59/77 |
| %1st in | 61% | 77% |
| 1st pts | 48/59 | 41/59 |
| %1st pts | 81% | 69% |
| 2nd pts | 16/37 | 7/18 |
| %2nd pts | 43% | 39% |
Damm made 20 aces . Serdarusic blasted 12 aces . Damm won 81% points on his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 43% of the points. On the other side, Serdarusic won 69% of the points on his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 39% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Damm | Serdarusic |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 1 | 4 |
| Converted | 1/1 | 4/8 |
| % Converted | 100% | 50% |
| Conceded | 4 | 6 |
| Saved | 2 | 3 |
| % Saved | 50% | 50% |
| Times Broken | 2 | 3 |
The American broke his opponent once with a 100% conversion rate. Damm lost his serve twice and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded. Nino broke his opponent 4 times with a 50% conversion rate. The Croatian conceded his serve 3 times and he saved 50% of the break points that he conceded.
| Damm | |||
| R1 Svajda |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 2-6 6-3 7-63 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 30 | 30 | |
| pts | 83-87 | 83-87 | |
| Total points | 170 | 170 | |
| Winners | 48 | 48 | |
| %Winners | 58% | 58% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 20 | 20 | |
| Double Faults | 6 | 6 | |
| 1st in | 59/96 | 59/96 | |
| % 1st in | 61% | 61% | |
| 1st pts | 48/59 | 48/59 | |
| % 1st pts | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 16/37 | 16/37 | |
| % 2nd pts | 43% | 43% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 1 | 1 | |
| Converted | 1/1 | 1/1 | |
| Converted % | 100% | 100% | |
| Conceded | 4 | 4 | |
| Saved | 2/4 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 2 | |
| Serdarusic | |||
| R1 Spizzirri |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-1 2-6 6-4 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 76-68 | 76-68 | |
| Total points | 144 | 144 | |
| Winners | 41 | 41 | |
| %Winners | 54% | 54% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 12 | 12 | |
| Double Faults | 0 | 0 | |
| 1st in | 59/77 | 59/77 | |
| % 1st in | 77% | 77% | |
| 1st pts | 41/59 | 41/59 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/18 | 7/18 | |
| % 2nd pts | 39% | 39% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/8 | 4/8 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 50% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 3/6 | 3 | |
| Saved % | 50% | 50% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
Head 2 Head
LLLLWLLWWL
LWLLWWWWLW Tennis Scores in Charlottesville Challenger
- Ethan QuinnQuinn – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (3-6 7-62 6-4) – See score progression
- Martin DammDamm – Zachary SvajdaSvajda (2-6 6-3 7-63) – See score progression
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – Eliot SpizzirriSpizzirri (6-1 2-6 6-4) – See score progression
- Patrick KypsonKypson – Gabriel DebruDebru (6-4 7-5) – See score progression
- Beibit ZhukayevZhukayev – Thai KwiatkowskiKwiatkowski (4-6 7-63 7-63) – See score progression
- Brandon HoltHolt – Emilio GomezGomez (6-2 6-2) – See score progression
- Alexander RitschardRitschard – Aidan MchughMchugh (6-4 6-4) – See score progression
- Ethan QuinnQuinn – Mitchell KruegerKrueger (3-6 7-6(2) 6-4) – See score progression
- Inaki Montes-De La TorreMontes-De La Torre – Adam WaltonWalton (6-2 3-6 7-6(4)) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Bernard TomicTomic – Emilio NavaNava (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Benoit PairePaire – Darian KingKing (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Denis KudlaKudla – Chris RodeschRodesch (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Lucas GerchGerch – Stefan KozlovKozlov (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Michael MmohMmoh – Steve JohnsonJohnson (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Reilly OpelkaOpelka – Tennys SandgrenSandgren (1-2) – H2H and prediction
- Nino SerdarusicSerdarusic – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Alex RybakovRybakov – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Cannon KingsleyKingsley – (0-0) – H2H and prediction
