Xiyu Wang and Peyton Stearns will square off in the 2nd round of the Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem for the 1st time in their career. They are scheduled to compete on Wednesday at 1:00 pm on Centre Court. In the following paragraphs, you can find the head to head analysis and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Xiyu Wang who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Xiyu Wang is the pick to win this match.
Xiyu Wang -> 1.66
Peyton Stearns -> 2.23
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Xiyu Wang vs. Peyton Stearns
There is no head to head record between Xiyu Wang and Peyton Stearns since this will be the first time that they will clash against each other in the main tour.
Xiyu Wang
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 15-15 | 12-10 | 3-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 27-25 | 17-17 | 5-4 | 0-0 | 5-4 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 41-25 | 15-10 | 23-11 | 3-3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 21-19 | 8-7 | 9-7 | 0-1 | 4-3 | 0-1 |
| 2020 | 11-7 | 11-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 62, Wang got to the 2nd round after beating Nuria Brancaccio 7-65 7-5.
In the 1st round, Wang had a good straight sets win against Brancaccio (7-65 7-5). During the match, Wang scored 86 points vs Brancaccio’s 83. The Chinese was exceptionally aggressive to blast 34 winners.
Talking about the service games, Wang couldn’t to score even 1 ace during the match and she committed only 1 double fault. Xiyu Wang lost the serve 3 times and she saved 6 break points. Furthermore, Wang put 72% of her first serves in, winning 59% (34/58) of the points behind her 1st serve and 57% (13/23) on the 2nd serve. Xiyu broke Brancaccio 4 times after converting 36% of her break points (4/11).
Wang has a winning record in the last 9 years having won 59% of her matches (200-141). 2-3 on clay in 2024. In connection with her performance on the same surface of this event, Wang has an overall61-36 match record in the last 9 years on clay.
The Chinese’s best result of the current season was getting to the final in Austin.
Wang has an overall 14-13 win-loss record in 2024, 2-3 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Rabat
Wang has never competed in this tournament before.
Peyton Stearns
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 14-13 | 3-8 | 11-5 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 45-23 | 19-13 | 19-7 | 6-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| 2022 | 33-15 | 29-12 | 1-2 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 8-9 | 8-7 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 6-6 | 4-4 | 0-0 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 81, the American got to the 2nd round after defeating Aleksandra Krunic 5-7 6-2 6-1.
In the 1st round against Krunic, Peyton recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (5-7 6-2 6-1). During the match Stearns scored 97 points vs Krunic’s 84. Stearns was exceptionally aggressive to blast 38 winners.
About the serving games, Stearns struck 2 aces and she committed only 3 double faults. Peyton Stearns lost the serve 4 times and she saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Stearns put 65% of her first serves in, winning 58% (38/65) of the points behind her 1st serve and 51% (18/35) on the 2nd serve. The American broke Krunic 7 times after converting 54% of her break points (7/13).
The American has a composed 8-12 win-loss record in 2024, 5-4 on clay (See FULL STATS).
Previously in Rabat
Previously, her best result was reaching the quarter in 2023. See her history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Wang | Stearns |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 1 |
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 |
| Tot Games | 25 | 27 |
| Pts | 86-83 | 97-84 |
| Total Points | 169 | 181 |
| Winners | 34 | 38 |
| %Winners | 40% | 39% |
Both Wang and Stearns played 1 match. At the moment, Peyton Stearns lost 1 set while Xiyu Wang hasn’t dropped a set so far. Wang has played 1 set(s) less than Stearns (2 vs 3). Therefore, Wang played 2 games less than Stearns. Wang scored 34 winners (40% of the total points). On the other side, Stearns made 38 winners (39%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Wang | Stearns |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 0 | 2 |
| Avg per match | 0 | 2 |
| 1st in | 58/81 | 65/100 |
| %1st in | 72% | 65% |
| 1st pts | 34/58 | 38/65 |
| %1st pts | 59% | 58% |
| 2nd pts | 13/23 | 18/35 |
| %2nd pts | 57% | 51% |
Wang didn’t manage to fire a single ace to far. Stearns recorded 2 aces . Wang won 59% points behind her first serve. She very solid her second serve to win 57% of the points. On the other side, Stearns won 58% of the points on her first serve. She had a solid display on her second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Wang | Stearns |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 4 | 7 |
| Converted | 4/11 | 7/13 |
| % Converted | 36% | 54% |
| Conceded | 9 | 6 |
| Saved | 6 | 2 |
| % Saved | 67% | 33% |
| Times Broken | 3 | 4 |
Xiyu broke her opponent 4 times with a 36% conversion rate. Xiyu dropped her serve 3 times and she saved 67% of the break points that she conceded. Peyton broke her opponent 7 times with a 54% conversion rate. Peyton conceded her serve 4 times and she saved 33% of the break points that she conceded.
| Wang | |||
| R1 Brancaccio |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 7-65 7-5 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 2 | |
| Tot Games | 25 | 25 | |
| pts | 86-83 | 86-83 | |
| Total points | 169 | 169 | |
| Winners | 34 | 34 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 40% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 0 | 0 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 1 | |
| 1st in | 58/81 | 58/81 | |
| % 1st in | 72% | 72% | |
| 1st pts | 34/58 | 34/58 | |
| % 1st pts | 59% | 59% | |
| 2nd pts | 13/23 | 13/23 | |
| % 2nd pts | 57% | 57% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 4 | 4 | |
| Converted | 4/11 | 4/11 | |
| Converted % | 36% | 36% | |
| Conceded | 9 | 9 | |
| Saved | 6/9 | 6 | |
| Saved % | 67% | 67% | |
| Times Broken | 3 | 3 | |
| Stearns | |||
| R1 Krunic |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 5-7 6-2 6-1 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 27 | 27 | |
| pts | 97-84 | 97-84 | |
| Total points | 181 | 181 | |
| Winners | 38 | 38 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 2 | 2 | |
| Double Faults | 3 | 3 | |
| 1st in | 65/100 | 65/100 | |
| % 1st in | 65% | 65% | |
| 1st pts | 38/65 | 38/65 | |
| % 1st pts | 58% | 58% | |
| 2nd pts | 18/35 | 18/35 | |
| % 2nd pts | 51% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 7 | 7 | |
| Converted | 7/13 | 7/13 | |
| Converted % | 54% | 54% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 2/6 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWLWLLLWLW
LWWWWWWWLW Tennis Scores in Rabat
- Sara Sorribes TormoSorribes Tormo – Nadia PodoroskaPodoroska (7-5 3-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Vasek PospisilPospisil – Marc PolmansPolmans (5-7 6-3 6-2) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Ilya IvashkaIvashka – Quentin HalysHalys (6-2 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Daniel EvansEvans – Thomas FabbianoFabbiano (6-3 3-6 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Lloyd HarrisHarris – Ruben BemelmansBemelmans (6-1 6-3) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Gregoire BarrereBarrere – Thanasi KokkinakisKokkinakis (w/o) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Yannick MadenMaden – Gilles MullerMuller (6-4 7-67) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jason Murray KublerMurray Kubler – Borna GojoGojo (6-4 7-5) – Stats, scores, rankings
- Jc AragoneAragone – Peter PolanskyPolansky (7-64 7-63) – Stats, scores, rankings
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Camilla RosatelloRosatello – Kamilla RakhimovaRakhimova (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mayar SherifSherif – Maria Lourdes CarleLourdes Carle (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Xiyu WangWang – Peyton StearnsStearns (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Martina TrevisanTrevisan – Lucia BronzettiBronzetti (1-0) – H2H and prediction
- Yafan WangWang – Viktoriya TomovaTomova (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Maria Camila Osorio SerranoCamila Osorio Serrano – Laura SiegemundSiegemund (0-0) – H2H and prediction
