Timo Stodder and Andrew Paulson will play each other in the 2nd round of the Ismaning Challenger for the 3rd time in their career. They are scheduled to play on Wednesday at 11:00 am on CENTRE COURT. In this post, we analyze their head to head performance and prediction.
Prediction, odds and live streaming
The pick for Tennis Tonic is Andrew Paulson who should win in 3 sets.
As per the initial odds, Andrew Paulson is the pick to win this match.
Andrew Paulson -> 1.59
Timo Stodder -> 2.25
Click here to see the updated quotes and live streaming (only selected countries - USA excluded).
To be able to watch live streaming bet365, a funded account is required or you need to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. 18+ BeGambleAware.
Here where top tennis events are broadcasted or streamed online (ATP, WTA).
At the challenger level, there will be free live streaming on Challenger TV.
Â
Prediction and head to head Timo Stodder vs. Andrew Paulson
This will be the 3rd time that Timo Stodder and Andrew Paulson face off. The head to head is 2-0 for Paulson (see full H2H stats), but they have never played each other on carpet.
The last time that they played, Paulson won 6-2 6-2 in the 1st round in M15 Ostrava back in 2021.
Timo Stodder
| Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4-7 | 0-0 | 4-5 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2023 | 42-34 | 0-1 | 40-31 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 1-1 |
| 2022 | 62-24 | 0-0 | 62-24 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2021 | 36-15 | 4-4 | 29-9 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2020 | 17-5 | 10-3 | 0-0 | 7-2 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Ranked no. 312, Stodder got to the 2nd round after defeating Vitaliy Sachko 3-6 7-63 6-3.
In the 1st round against Sachko, Timo recovered from a 1-set down deficit before winning (3-6 7-63 6-3). During the match, Stodder scored 103 points vs Sachko’s 99. Stodder was extremely aggressive to blast 40 winners.
Talking about the service games, Stodder made 6 aces and he committed only 7 double faults. Timo Stodder lost the serve 4 times and he saved 2 break points. Furthermore, Stodder put 56% of his first serves in, winning 69% (40/58) of the points behind his 1st serve and 53% (24/45) on the 2nd serve. Stodder broke Sachko 3 times after converting 38% of his break points (3/8).
Stodder has a solid record in the last 8 years having won 67% of his matches (185-90). 1-0 on carpet in 2023. Regarding his performance on the same surface of this tournament, Stodder has an aggregate1-0 match record in the last 8 years on carpet.
Stodder’s best result of the current year was getting to the final in M25 Most and M25 Marburg.
The German has an overall 39-30 win-loss record in 2023, 1-0 on carpet (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Ismaning Challenger
Timo has never competed in this tournament before.
Andrew Paulson
36 - 19win/loss
316
302
LLLWWWWLLL | Year | Total | Hard | Clay | I.hard | Grass | Carpet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 37-22 | 1-3 | 31-13 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 4-1 |
| 2022 | 53-27 | 6-3 | 30-15 | 15-7 | 0-0 | 2-2 |
| 2021 | 47-26 | 19-8 | 11-11 | 15-6 | 0-0 | 2-1 |
| 2020 | 4-8 | 0-0 | 4-5 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| 2019 | 13-7 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 4-2 | 0-0 | 6-2 |
Ranked no. 327, Paulson reached the 2nd round after beating Jakob Schnaitter 6-3 7-5, Tom Gentzsch 3-6 7-65 7-64 and Louis Wessels 6-4 6-76 6-3.
In the 1st round, Andrew defeated Wessels (6-4 6-76 6-3). During the match Paulson scored 103 points vs Wessels’s 91. The Czech was quite aggressive to blast 48 winners.
Talking about serving, Paulson managed to score 19 aces and he committed only 4 double faults. Overall, Andrew Paulson was pretty efficient on serve to win 81% (48/59) of his 1st serve and 54% (19/35) on the second serve. However, this didn’t prevent his to concede the serve once. Andrew broke Wessels 4 times after converting 50% of his break points (4/8).
Paulson’s best result of the season was getting to the final in M25 Poprad,M25+H Kassel,M25 Lodz and M25 Zlatibor.
Andrew has a composed 36-19 win-loss record in 2023, 3-0 on carpet (See FULL STATS).
Previously in the Ismaning Challenger
Previously, his best result was reaching the qualifications in 2022. See his history.
H2H Performance in the tournament
Matches, sets, games and points
| Points | Stodder | Paulson |
|---|---|---|
| Match played | 1 | 3 |
| Tot Set | 3 | 8 |
| Tot Games | 31 | 88 |
| Pts | 103-99 | 282-261 |
| Total Points | 202 | 543 |
| Winners | 40 | 133 |
| %Winners | 39% | 47% |
Stodder played 1 match while Paulson competed in 3 matches. Paulson started his run from the qualifications while Stodder had a direct access to the main draw. Both players lost a set in the event. Timo Stodder conceded 1 set, while Andrew Paulson conceded 2 sets. Stodder has played 5 set(s) less than Paulson (3 vs 8). Therefore, Stodder played 57 games less than Paulson. Stodder scored 40 winners (39% of the total points). On the other side, Andrew struck 133 winners (47%).
Serve Performance
| Serve | Stodder | Paulson |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 6 | 40 |
| Avg per match | 6 | 13.3 |
| 1st in | 58/103 | 164/259 |
| %1st in | 56% | 63% |
| 1st pts | 40/58 | 133/164 |
| %1st pts | 69% | 81% |
| 2nd pts | 24/45 | 48/95 |
| %2nd pts | 53% | 51% |
Stodder bagged 6 aces . Paulson scored 40 aces (13.3 per match). Stodder won 69% points behind his first serve. He extremely effective on his second serve to win 53% of the points. On the other side, Paulson won 81% of the points behind his first serve. He had a solid display on his second serve to win 51% of the points.
How they played the important points
| Breaks | Stodder | Paulson |
|---|---|---|
| Won | 3 | 9 |
| Converted | 3/8 | 9/23 |
| % Converted | 38% | 39% |
| Conceded | 6 | 15 |
| Saved | 2 | 11 |
| % Saved | 33% | 73% |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 |
Stodder broke his opponent 3 times with a 38% conversion rate. Timo conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 33% of the break points that he conceded. Andrew broke his opponents 9 times with a 39% conversion rate. Andrew conceded his serve 4 times and he saved 73% of the break points that he conceded.
| Stodder | |||
| R1 Sachko |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 3-6 7-63 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 3 | 3 | |
| Tot Games | 31 | 31 | |
| pts | 103-99 | 103-99 | |
| Total points | 202 | 202 | |
| Winners | 40 | 40 | |
| %Winners | 39% | 39% | |
| SERVE | |||
| Aces | 6 | 6 | |
| Double Faults | 7 | 7 | |
| 1st in | 58/103 | 58/103 | |
| % 1st in | 56% | 56% | |
| 1st pts | 40/58 | 40/58 | |
| % 1st pts | 69% | 69% | |
| 2nd pts | 24/45 | 24/45 | |
| % 2nd pts | 53% | 53% | |
| Breaks | |||
| Won | 3 | 3 | |
| Converted | 3/8 | 3/8 | |
| Converted % | 38% | 38% | |
| Conceded | 6 | 6 | |
| Saved | 2/6 | 2 | |
| Saved % | 33% | 33% | |
| Times Broken | 4 | 4 | |
| Paulson | |||||
| Q1 Schnaitter |
Q3 Gentzsch |
R1 Wessels |
Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | 6-3 7-5 | 3-6 7-65 7-64 | 6-4 6-76 6-3 | ||
| Tot Set | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | |
| Tot Games | 21 | 35 | 32 | 88 | |
| pts | 70-55 | 109-115 | 103-91 | 282-261 | |
| Total points | 125 | 224 | 194 | 543 | |
| Winners | 28 | 57 | 48 | 133 | |
| %Winners | 40% | 52% | 47% | 47% | |
| SERVE | |||||
| Aces | 10 | 11 | 19 | 40 | |
| Double Faults | 1 | 6 | 4 | 11 | |
| 1st in | 32/50 | 73/115 | 59/94 | 164/259 | |
| % 1st in | 64% | 63% | 63% | 63% | |
| 1st pts | 28/32 | 57/73 | 48/59 | 133/164 | |
| % 1st pts | 88% | 78% | 81% | 81% | |
| 2nd pts | 7/18 | 22/42 | 19/35 | 48/95 | |
| % 2nd pts | 39% | 52% | 54% | 51% | |
| Breaks | |||||
| Won | 5 | 0 | 4 | 9 | |
| Converted | 5/10 | 0/5 | 4/8 | 9/23 | |
| Converted % | 50% | 0% | 50% | 39% | |
| Conceded | 2 | 7 | 6 | 15 | |
| Saved | 0/2 | 6/7 | 5/6 | 11 | |
| Saved % | 0% | 86% | 83% | 169% | |
| Times Broken | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |
Head 2 Head
LWWLLLWLLL
Tennis Scores in Ismaning Challenger
- Antoine BellierBellier – Harold MayotMayot (7-61 6-3) – See score progression
- Kacper ZukZuk – Adrian AndreevAndreev (7-612 6-4) – See score progression
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Michael GeertsGeerts (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – Mate ValkuszValkusz (6-4 7-613) – See score progression
- Andrew PaulsonPaulson – Louis WesselsWessels (6-4 6-76 6-3) – See score progression
- Alibek KachmazovKachmazov – Jan ChoinskiChoinski (6-4 5-7 6-2) – See score progression
- Rudolf MollekerMolleker – Daniel MasurMasur (7-64 4-6 6-3) – See score progression
- Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler – Mili PoljicakPoljicak (6-4 6-1) – See score progression
- Timo StodderStodder – Vitaliy SachkoSachko (3-6 7-63 6-3) – See score progression
- Henri SquireSquire – Denis YevseyevYevseyev (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
- Antoine BellierBellier – Harold MayotMayot (7-6(1) 6-3) – See score progression
- Mats RosenkranzRosenkranz – Mate ValkuszValkusz (6-4 7-6(13)) – See score progression
- Andrew PaulsonPaulson – Louis WesselsWessels (6-4 6-7(6) 6-3) – See score progression
- Kacper ZukZuk – Adrian AndreevAndreev (7-6(12) 6-4) – See score progression
- Maximilian MartererMarterer – Michael GeertsGeerts (6-3 6-4) – See score progression
Upcoming matches in the draw
- Damir DzumhurDzumhur – Lukas KleinKlein (2-0) – H2H and prediction
- Mathias BourgueBourgue – Oleksii KrutykhKrutykh (0-0) – H2H and prediction
- Nerman FaticFatic – Marius CopilCopil (0-1) – H2H and prediction
- Timo StodderStodder – Andrew PaulsonPaulson (0-2) – H2H and prediction
- Kacper ZukZuk – Maximilian MartererMarterer (1-1) – H2H and prediction
- Henri SquireSquire – Marc-Andrea HueslerHuesler (0-0) – H2H and prediction
